|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack
Post: RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid a...
| A batch file with those lines doesn't give the same results ? |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
20,670 |
06-15-2012, 07:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack
Post: RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid a...
|
Quote:
--
It does, but I'm trying to save some time + to have one final result of cracked hashes, time, speed and all.
--
Yes, I see and agree with your point of view.
At least, every new batch l... |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
20,670 |
06-15-2012, 11:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Implement command line rules for plus
Post: RE: Implement command line rules for plus
|
D3ad0ne Wrote: (06-27-2012, 05:56 AM)
--
Would be great to have back the ability to use rules on the command line, if anything for modes 6 and 7; 0 and 1 would be nice.
I still find myself using t... |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
16,556 |
06-28-2012, 12:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid Mask + Dict in HC-Plus v0.09b
Post: RE: Hybrid Mask + Dict in HC-Plus v0.09b
| Have you try it with other kind of hashes (non --hash-type 2500) ? Did you
got the same problem ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
15 |
14,571 |
06-25-2012, 10:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid Mask + Dict in HC-Plus v0.09b
Post: RE: Hybrid Mask + Dict in HC-Plus v0.09b
| Left mask + dict usually takes way longer than dict + mask. Not strange, at least
to my use.
When you run Mask + Dict it says "Exhausted" after 1 second doesn't look too
much strange cause you're... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
15 |
14,571 |
06-25-2012, 11:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| Got the already seen before ERROR clGetPlatformIDs -1001
Should be back to 12.4 (for most recent oclhashcat) or previous
versions for older oclhashcat ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-29-2012, 06:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| Yes, I was trying 12.6 with latest plus beta. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-29-2012, 05:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| I supose that those with no problems using 12.6 are all on Linux, as no reference
to Windows was done, right (I mean Windows 7 x64) ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-29-2012, 07:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
|
atom Wrote: (06-30-2012, 08:35 AM)
--
I just updated to 12.6 (final, not beta) on all my linux and windows machines. I can not reproduce this. Any specific command-line I can run?
--
I really did t... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-30-2012, 07:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
|
atom Wrote: (07-01-2012, 09:37 AM)
--
yeah crossfire always caused problems in the past. if you can, remove the crossfire bridge and try again. its worth trying it
--
Yes, I have to do that test. A... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
07-02-2012, 11:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_...
| ... or directory.
Any ideas ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,123 |
07-08-2012, 06:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| Thanks for your reply M@LIK.
I did a try with 12.7 beta... maybe is this the source of the problem ?
Anybody else trying 12.7 beta ?
It's quite annoying every time one have to clean AMD drivers a... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,123 |
07-08-2012, 10:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Beta 0.09 missing?
Post: RE: Beta 0.09 missing?
| You're not the only one, I also didn't see plus there as well.
So, at least, no vision problems.
Must be something else. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
3,841 |
07-08-2012, 10:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| Done. No problem with lite-0.10b64. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,123 |
07-08-2012, 11:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| Yes, nothing...
Also, if the program is looking for a "markov_le.llvmir" file, there are a list
of llvmir files in the 4098 folder but not with that specific name.
Creating a, suposed missing directo... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,123 |
07-08-2012, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
| lite-0.10, for sure, M@LIK.
lite-0.11 right now doesn't work (at least to me).
Since for global beta testers, plus 0.10 is gone and lite 0.11 looks weird,
I would like to see a kind word for othe... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,123 |
07-08-2012, 11:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
| mastercracker, did you decompressed all the files over an already existing folder
or you did it to a new folder (whatever named you might give to it) ?
I guess, if you did it to a new folder, there's ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-06-2012, 10:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| Probably it depends on what -a 4 is used but, I almost "forgot"
it. This wake up call push me to do a quick run just to
check it and see if it worth.
On a common 4 millions md5 hash list, which had al... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,338 |
08-14-2012, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
Post: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
| I think this question was already solved (or not ? can't remember)
when 0.40 was out. I see now the same is happening with 0.40 b1.
Should we expect the program to work like this, and manually
remo... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,088 |
08-26-2012, 01:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
Post: RE: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
| Thanks for remembering me that atom.
I knew the solution was already defined, but wasn't 100% sure. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,088 |
08-26-2012, 11:50 PM |
