|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Reassign tasks
Post: RE: Reassign tasks
|
mastercracker Wrote: (10-03-2010, 04:50 AM)
--
boris_ Wrote: (10-03-2010, 01:36 AM)
--
atom Wrote: (07-12-2010, 10:29 AM)
--
sry, redistribution is currently not possible
--
atom, no possible solu... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,473 |
10-03-2010, 01:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Implement command line rules for plus
Post: RE: Implement command line rules for plus
|
D3ad0ne Wrote: (06-27-2012, 05:56 AM)
--
Would be great to have back the ability to use rules on the command line, if anything for modes 6 and 7; 0 and 1 would be nice.
I still find myself using t... |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
16,556 |
06-28-2012, 12:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HashcatGUI v0.21 Released
Post: RE: HashcatGUI v0.21 Released
| Looks like there is a problem when selecting a large number of dictionaires.
Does it have a limited number of files ? Or might be some weird dictionaire
name in the dictionaire folder...
As a sug... |
|
proinside |
User Contributions
|
4 |
9,256 |
10-27-2012, 06:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| Can anyone confirm if a rule have a limit in length ?
Rules with length superior to 15 characters gives a "Cannot convert rule for use on GPU" message. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-17-2013, 09:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| As an example, rule accepted (at least, with no message...):
l$@$e$a$r$t$h$l$i$n$k$.$n$e$t
Rule not accepted:
l$@$b$t$i$n$t$e$r$n$e$t$.$c$o$m |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-18-2013, 01:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| Good to know that, atom. Thanks. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-22-2013, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat pot file: permission denied
Post: RE: Hashcat pot file: permission denied
| Have you try deleted the hashcat.pot file and run again ?
Did you got the same random error message after deleting the hashcat.pot file ? |
|
proinside |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
16,277 |
12-01-2012, 07:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Post: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
| Hi
Already did a search but could not found what to do to solve this issue,
while testing 0.19:
XP Pro 32 bits
Platform: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., OpenCL 1.0 ATI-Stream-v2.0.1
ERROR: Drive... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,064 |
05-28-2010, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Post: RE: Driver/SDK version message
| Ok, thanks. I had to uninstall previous SDK version and then all went
right with the new one.
A doubt, if it makes no difference to put this question in this same thread:
Using a command like this, ... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,064 |
05-29-2010, 01:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Post: RE: Driver/SDK version message
| Thanks bot of you, atom and mastercracker, for your answers.
They were very helpful.
Any trick to make oclHashcat check an hash, lets say from 0 to 10
characters in lenght... apart from doing tha... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,064 |
05-29-2010, 10:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Single hash use on command line
Post: RE: Single hash use on command line
| I see it useful. Have to test and see if that also improves (a lot) or not the speed.
Thanks for the suggestion ! |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,640 |
10-11-2010, 08:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Single hash use on command line
Post: RE: Single hash use on command line
| Only now I realised that -h option isn't working (availbale) in olchashcat ! :blush:
Or am I wrong ? I suppose that working a single hash may give an extra
speed, or not ? |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,640 |
10-18-2010, 11:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
| Got this error with a 400 Mb list. Version 0.07 worked well with these
size files. Wih smaller size lists, all seems normal.
What can be the reason for this error ?
Using 12.3 ccc (while was using ... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-14-2012, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
| Ok, splited the file and the problem disapears.
However, among the features that are still announced
on https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/ this
"Multi-Hash (up to 24 million hashes)"
probably is corr... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-15-2012, 02:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
|
atom Wrote: (04-15-2012, 10:30 AM)
--
Yeah, your are right. I will update it with the release of 0.08. I played around a bit, looks like my hd7970 (3gb ram) is still able to load 15 million hashes.
-... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-15-2012, 12:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetPlatformIDs() -1001
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetPlatformIDs() -1001
| Same error with last 12.6 !
I guess I have to go back to old drivers, and old versions of oclhashcat...
What a mess from amd (unless I'm wrong, I hope so).
Anyone else with these same problem ? |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
15,886 |
06-29-2012, 06:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
| Autotuned --gpu-accel from xx to x not present in the help
command line. Any info available about this option ?
Autotunned can be disable ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,351 |
11-13-2012, 06:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
| Ok, understood. It's very rare use anything above -n 80... sometimes a lower
value, depending of the algo, or the number of hashes.
Thanks for the explanation about the target of this function, atom. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,351 |
11-14-2012, 05:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - du...
| Using a single rule file, with many rules, not multiple rule files:
- when running hashcat, we get a screen message about the duplicated rules that are skipped by hashcat
- when running oclHashc... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-18-2013, 07:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat vs oclHashcat - duplicated rules behav...
| Thanks for the confirmation, atom. This save me from burning GPUs more than needed.
Hash-IT: comment appreciated. Can you open a TRAC ticket, if you please, or send
me a step by step to do it my self... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-19-2013, 03:56 PM |
