|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Passwords^12 - program & registration
Post: RE: Passwords^12 - program & registration
|
thorsheim Wrote: (10-12-2012, 01:42 PM)
--
We have now opened up for registrations for Passwords^12. Come, meet & listen to atom, Sc00bz, Joan Daemen, Colin Percival and an "all-star" cast of speaker... |
|
proinside |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
20,084 |
10-20-2012, 11:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
| - i'm getting rule $9$9 as invalid while $9$8 (and the likes in the same sequence) don't show any message
- in a3 mode while using -1 ?l?d the input mask screen shows, as example, while running 6 cha... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-20-2013, 05:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
| The problem #1 has be reproduced.
The test: pick a few md5 hashes, use best64 or shorter rule file and we don't get any error message.
Now edit your rule file and append to the end of that rule file... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-23-2013, 08:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
|
atom Wrote: (11-26-2013, 11:53 AM)
--
I tried to reproduce #1 but failed.
I expect this to be a cr/lf error somehow. Therefore it's important to have a hexdump from a rulefile that creates that er... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-27-2013, 12:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| Got the already seen before ERROR clGetPlatformIDs -1001
Should be back to 12.4 (for most recent oclhashcat) or previous
versions for older oclhashcat ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-29-2012, 06:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| Yes, I was trying 12.6 with latest plus beta. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-29-2012, 05:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
| I supose that those with no problems using 12.6 are all on Linux, as no reference
to Windows was done, right (I mean Windows 7 x64) ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-29-2012, 07:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
|
atom Wrote: (06-30-2012, 08:35 AM)
--
I just updated to 12.6 (final, not beta) on all my linux and windows machines. I can not reproduce this. Any specific command-line I can run?
--
I really did t... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
06-30-2012, 07:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
|
atom Wrote: (07-01-2012, 09:37 AM)
--
yeah crossfire always caused problems in the past. if you can, remove the crossfire bridge and try again. its worth trying it
--
Yes, I have to do that test. A... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
07-02-2012, 11:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
| mastercracker, did you decompressed all the files over an already existing folder
or you did it to a new folder (whatever named you might give to it) ?
I guess, if you did it to a new folder, there's ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-06-2012, 10:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
| Give to me this message, if using < dic : Access is denied. (dic is the dic name folder, of course).
Normall behavior, but reading the every single dic before starts, whitout using the < parameter.
... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,235 |
04-16-2012, 10:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
|
undeath Wrote: (04-16-2012, 10:54 PM)
--
doesn't work for directories of course.
--
atom, can this option be implemented ? At least it will give
a faster start for those that don't care too much a... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,235 |
04-17-2012, 05:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
| blandyuk, M@LIK and all of you that are looking for more
speed, come in and join the request !
All in all, we can save a lot of time when thinking about so
many times we have to run the program a... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,235 |
04-17-2012, 06:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
| Probably it depends on what -a 4 is used but, I almost "forgot"
it. This wake up call push me to do a quick run just to
check it and see if it worth.
On a common 4 millions md5 hash list, which had al... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,338 |
08-14-2012, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
|
mastercracker Wrote: (12-07-2012, 03:12 PM)
--
Ok there is a limitation there but why you don't use each dic on a separate command line (bat or bash file)? Or put all those wordlists in a folder and... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,855 |
12-11-2012, 02:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
| Still using the same dictionaires and remaining hashes file, started
another run, this time with --markov-disable and oclhashcat is yet
founding results, on the second run with this option disable.
... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,855 |
01-31-2013, 09:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
| I'm still runing this "old" version, 0.10-rc-3-12.8 and I'm getting a situation
that would like to report to know if this is normal to happen.
We run in command line a normal, no rules, attack.
We ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,855 |
01-31-2013, 08:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
| is this happening with hashcat as well ?
After running a single dic attack against a large hash list file, did a second
run, no change in command line (the same single dic attack) and more pass
were f... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,100 |
04-13-2012, 06:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
| Thanks for the advice. I'll do it for sure. |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,100 |
04-25-2012, 08:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
|
undeath Wrote: (04-28-2012, 06:45 PM)
--
doesn't work for me.
Code:
--
H:\oclHashcat-plus-0.08b60>oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m11 joomla.txt ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d -a3
WARNING: Hashfile 'joomla.txt' in lin... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,305 |
04-28-2012, 07:20 PM |
