Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Testing using 12.8 drivers:
- did a run against a list of 6k ipb (2811) and with latest beta, simple dic
attack, using only rockyou.dic file as dic, took 3 minutes;
- then running exactly the s... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,158 |
08-27-2012, 12:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Just did an uninstall of 12.6 believing that 12.8 was giving
good news. At the moment can't go back to 12.6 and, who
knows, maybe someone around here is still using 12.6 and
can give some feedback.
I'... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,158 |
08-27-2012, 05:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: HashcatGUI v0.19.beta6 Released
Post: RE: HashcatGUI v0.19.beta6 Released
Only one rule file can be selected ?
Would be good to add/select more than one rule file. Once the first selected
rule was finished, the program would take the second rule file and start another
ru... |
|
proinside |
User Contributions
|
7 |
15,962 |
10-27-2012, 06:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: 2013 outdated versions
Hashcat 0.42b5 have this behavior.
OclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3 don't give any message and works normally (at the moment). |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-01-2013, 03:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
M@LIK, epixoip and K9... situation solved.
Thanks to all your feedback. Very much appreciated. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-02-2013, 01:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
I'll try to replicate the situation and back with results: command line used, file and results.
May take a while.
About the changes... maybe I downloaded the file too soon ? I have to download it
aga... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
03-31-2013, 08:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Experienced a situation, several times, when using a large md5 hash
list and run with oclHascat-plus 0.15b3 with best64.rule.
Then run the same simple command line again. No result should be
expected,... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
03-30-2013, 09:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
atom Wrote: (03-31-2013, 12:34 PM)
--
about the changes in 0.45 its strange i see something:
type: feature
file: hashcat-cli
desc: dropped predefined charsets ?h, ?F, ?G and ?R
trac: #55
t... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
04-04-2013, 01:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Did a few screen captures before start, and at the finish.
The first time, and a second time were done with the same command line, same options,
same hash file, and, as the 4th screen shoot shows, o... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
05-18-2013, 06:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Post: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Hi
Already did a search but could not found what to do to solve this issue,
while testing 0.19:
XP Pro 32 bits
Platform: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., OpenCL 1.0 ATI-Stream-v2.0.1
ERROR: Drive... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,064 |
05-28-2010, 09:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Post: RE: Driver/SDK version message
Ok, thanks. I had to uninstall previous SDK version and then all went
right with the new one.
A doubt, if it makes no difference to put this question in this same thread:
Using a command like this, ... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,064 |
05-29-2010, 01:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: Driver/SDK version message and a few tweaks
Post: RE: Driver/SDK version message
Thanks bot of you, atom and mastercracker, for your answers.
They were very helpful.
Any trick to make oclHashcat check an hash, lets say from 0 to 10
characters in lenght... apart from doing tha... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,064 |
05-29-2010, 10:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: Single hash use on command line
Post: RE: Single hash use on command line
I see it useful. Have to test and see if that also improves (a lot) or not the speed.
Thanks for the suggestion ! |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,637 |
10-11-2010, 08:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Single hash use on command line
Post: RE: Single hash use on command line
Only now I realised that -h option isn't working (availbale) in olchashcat ! :blush:
Or am I wrong ? I suppose that working a single hash may give an extra
speed, or not ? |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,637 |
10-18-2010, 11:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Got this error with a 400 Mb list. Version 0.07 worked well with these
size files. Wih smaller size lists, all seems normal.
What can be the reason for this error ?
Using 12.3 ccc (while was using ... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-14-2012, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Ok, splited the file and the problem disapears.
However, among the features that are still announced
on https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/ this
"Multi-Hash (up to 24 million hashes)"
probably is corr... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-15-2012, 02:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61
atom Wrote: (04-15-2012, 10:30 AM)
--
Yeah, your are right. I will update it with the release of 0.08. I played around a bit, looks like my hd7970 (3gb ram) is still able to load 15 million hashes.
-... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,216 |
04-15-2012, 12:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetPlatformIDs() -1001
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetPlatformIDs() -1001
Same error with last 12.6 !
I guess I have to go back to old drivers, and old versions of oclhashcat...
What a mess from amd (unless I'm wrong, I hope so).
Anyone else with these same problem ? |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
15,886 |
06-29-2012, 06:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Autotuned --gpu-accel from xx to x not present in the help
command line. Any info available about this option ?
Autotunned can be disable ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,348 |
11-13-2012, 06:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Ok, understood. It's very rare use anything above -n 80... sometimes a lower
value, depending of the algo, or the number of hashes.
Thanks for the explanation about the target of this function, atom. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,348 |
11-14-2012, 05:48 PM |