|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: oclhashcat vs hashcat
| You all might already know this, but here it is:
Pick a more or less large, if possible, md5 hash file, and run a simple dictionaire
attack, no rules, no remove option, against your own dictionair... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 12:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght except...
| --remove option is available ? I did a research in the documentation
and using --help parmeter but didn't find nothing. |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-01-2011, 11:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_...
| ... or directory.
Any ideas ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,121 |
07-08-2012, 06:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
| Experienced a situation, several times, when using a large md5 hash
list and run with oclHascat-plus 0.15b3 with best64.rule.
Then run the same simple command line again. No result should be
expected,... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
03-30-2013, 09:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
Post: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
| By mistake typed -m 00 instead of -m 0 and didn't receive any
error message. Not important, I guess, but it's a detail.
The program however still works as MD5 with -m 00, but didn't
check if it gives ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,769 |
03-19-2013, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: plus b53 rule length limit ?
| Can anyone confirm if a rule have a limit in length ?
Rules with length superior to 15 characters gives a "Cannot convert rule for use on GPU" message. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-17-2013, 09:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Question: use of SSD
Post: Question: use of SSD
| Does any one already experienced using a SSD while testing / using
hashcat or hashcat-plus or lite ? Does it makes any significant diference
in performance (reading dictionaires, heavy or not) or an... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
12,844 |
06-28-2012, 10:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --debug option
Post: RE: --debug option
| High speed would not be an important factor as the final result, the successful list rules, would be
very valuable. Then it would be possible to merge, or not, those successful rules with new ones fo... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
10,394 |
02-08-2014, 10:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: --debug option
Post: RE: --debug option
| Outstanding work atom ! Thank you for the effort to implement this. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
10,394 |
02-12-2014, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --disable-potfile option not available ?
Post: RE: --disable-potfile option not available ?
|
atom Wrote: (04-22-2012, 04:10 PM)
--
it is required when you use the --show or the --left switch, thats why you can not disable it
--
Understood, thanks.
What impact that might have in performanc... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,332 |
04-22-2012, 11:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
| is this happening with hashcat as well ?
After running a single dic attack against a large hash list file, did a second
run, no change in command line (the same single dic attack) and more pass
were f... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,100 |
04-13-2012, 06:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
| Looks like is still happening with hashcat.
Had a list, run once to clean, no rules and got a number of found ones.
Run a second time and few more were found.
Ok, a third run just to see what happe... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,100 |
04-25-2012, 08:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
| Thanks for the advice. I'll do it for sure. |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,100 |
04-25-2012, 08:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
| Ok, thanks for your reply epixoip !
Driver installed: 13.4. Windows X64.
Following your suggestion, I did some runs with your clean command line, always using rockyou
dictionaire.
The progra... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-07-2013, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
| While testing, using a 18 md5 hashes file, running -a 6 and -1 ?l?d?u?s ?1?1:
Test using john.dic and then example.dic.
First with only ?1, then with ?1?1. Will get a crash with ?1?1 or ?1?1?1.
D... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-14-2013, 12:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
| A few words to add to this limitation.
I had faced many times the not logical using expensive top
cards, running hours of attacks, getting lots of results, yes, but,
then... why just try a run of th ... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
01-06-2013, 09:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
|
undeath Wrote: (04-28-2012, 06:45 PM)
--
doesn't work for me.
Code:
--
H:\oclHashcat-plus-0.08b60>oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m11 joomla.txt ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d -a3
WARNING: Hashfile 'joomla.txt' in lin... |
|
proinside |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,299 |
04-28-2012, 07:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
| M@LIK, epixoip and K9... situation solved.
Thanks to all your feedback. Very much appreciated. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-02-2013, 01:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 6970 users wanted
Post: RE: 6970 users wanted
| Windows 7 64
Catalyst 12.3
Sapphire 6990
Tested mode: 2611.
Not working since 0.08 version.
Tested 0.08/0.081/0.09 with 14 hashes
Working with 0.07 version !
Already did experience with 12.6 and 12... |
|
proinside |
General Help
|
15 |
28,646 |
07-20-2012, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 6970 users wanted
Post: RE: 6970 users wanted
| mastercracker, you mean simple dictionary with no rules at all ?
I don't want to "waste" time cleaning the actual driver to install
a new version that do not brings nothing new about this specific
pr... |
|
proinside |
General Help
|
15 |
28,646 |
08-17-2012, 08:17 PM |
