Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
I'll try to replicate the situation and back with results: command line used, file and results.
May take a while.
About the changes... maybe I downloaded the file too soon ? I have to download it
aga... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
03-31-2013, 08:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Experienced a situation, several times, when using a large md5 hash
list and run with oclHascat-plus 0.15b3 with best64.rule.
Then run the same simple command line again. No result should be
expected,... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
03-30-2013, 09:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
atom Wrote: (03-31-2013, 12:34 PM)
--
about the changes in 0.45 its strange i see something:
type: feature
file: hashcat-cli
desc: dropped predefined charsets ?h, ?F, ?G and ?R
trac: #55
t... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
04-04-2013, 01:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Did a few screen captures before start, and at the finish.
The first time, and a second time were done with the same command line, same options,
same hash file, and, as the 4th screen shoot shows, o... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
05-18-2013, 06:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Testing using 12.8 drivers:
- did a run against a list of 6k ipb (2811) and with latest beta, simple dic
attack, using only rockyou.dic file as dic, took 3 minutes;
- then running exactly the s... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,159 |
08-27-2012, 12:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Just did an uninstall of 12.6 believing that 12.8 was giving
good news. At the moment can't go back to 12.6 and, who
knows, maybe someone around here is still using 12.6 and
can give some feedback.
I'... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,159 |
08-27-2012, 05:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat SE
Post: oclhashcat SE
With some doubts that this will be seen as an interesting feature/request,
a Special Edition of oclhashcat, that would be build to work only a single
hash, instead of multiple hashes, would return/g... |
|
proinside |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
6,930 |
07-15-2010, 10:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: 2013 outdated versions
Hashcat 0.42b5 have this behavior.
OclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3 don't give any message and works normally (at the moment). |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-01-2013, 03:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
M@LIK, epixoip and K9... situation solved.
Thanks to all your feedback. Very much appreciated. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-02-2013, 01:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Autotuned --gpu-accel from xx to x not present in the help
command line. Any info available about this option ?
Autotunned can be disable ? |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,351 |
11-13-2012, 06:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 beta 50
Ok, understood. It's very rare use anything above -n 80... sometimes a lower
value, depending of the algo, or the number of hashes.
Thanks for the explanation about the target of this function, atom. |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,351 |
11-14-2012, 05:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - du...
Using a single rule file, with many rules, not multiple rule files:
- when running hashcat, we get a screen message about the duplicated rules that are skipped by hashcat
- when running oclHashc... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-18-2013, 07:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat vs oclHashcat - duplicated rules behav...
Thanks for the confirmation, atom. This save me from burning GPUs more than needed.
Hash-IT: comment appreciated. Can you open a TRAC ticket, if you please, or send
me a step by step to do it my self... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-19-2013, 03:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat vs oclHashcat - duplicated rules behav...
Thank you Hash-IT.
Another detail.
Using a rule file with 7.999 rules, got the folowing results:
- Hashcat skip 1.491 duplicate rules, so it work with 6.508 rules.
- ULM sort and remove 1.648 duplic... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-20-2013, 05:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: (updated) Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicated rules behavior
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.45b6 vs oclHashcat 0.15b9 - duplicat...
Using d3ad0ne_1.5K.rule:
- hashcat 0.45b6 display 1.540 rules, no rule is skipped
- oclHashcat 0.15b9 display 1.522 rules, some displayed as duplicated and ignored.
Checked the rule file and I ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,230 |
04-26-2013, 03:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: -a 6 crashing ?!
I may be wrong, and I might be using the command line in a non correct way. Can anyone confirm this:
- using -a 6
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -a 6 -n 80 -m0 --force --status --markov-disable --disable-po... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-06-2013, 02:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
Ok, thanks for your reply epixoip !
Driver installed: 13.4. Windows X64.
Following your suggestion, I did some runs with your clean command line, always using rockyou
dictionaire.
The progra... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-07-2013, 08:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: -a 6 crashing ?!
Post: RE: -a 6 crashing ?!
While testing, using a 18 md5 hashes file, running -a 6 and -1 ?l?d?u?s ?1?1:
Test using john.dic and then example.dic.
First with only ?1, then with ?1?1. Will get a crash with ?1?1 or ?1?1?1.
D... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,120 |
07-14-2013, 12:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: v1.30 about to release
Post: RE: v1.30 about to release
I'm having a persistent ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30 when pressing the b key
running 1.30b24, but have that in previous beta as well, no matter what dictionaire
is running, using for test one 290X... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
5,241 |
07-06-2014, 06:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: v 1.35
Post: v 1.35
When pressing quit in anormal run I get, always, the following message:
WARNING: Failed to restore default fan speed for gpu number: 2
WARNING: Failed to restore default fan speed for gpu number: ... |
|
proinside |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
4,525 |
03-27-2015, 11:42 PM |