Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
I'm also getting this error with Nvidia 660 TI using cuda32bit
Wordlist is a seq generated from 6000000000 to 7000000000. (10 digit passwords)
Does the generating dictionary stats, and hits that... |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-14-2013, 02:33 AM |
|
|
Thread: What gfx card to buy?
Post: RE: What gfx card to buy?
I know this thread is a little old, but I bought a mid-range card I guess you could say a 660 TI...with a Q8400 desktop and this card. I'm getting around 29,300k for WPA dictionary attack..
Was gett... |
|
squadx |
General Help
|
12 |
20,297 |
02-14-2013, 03:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
because the password is a guaranteed to be a 10 digit number, no characters...instead of generating the list from 1 - 10, i do it in chunks.
How would a mask be more effective? |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-16-2013, 07:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
are you asking me or the OP? |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-15-2013, 11:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
maybe I simply don't understand mask attacks, and don't see how they would benefit if it's soley a guaranteed 10 digit number |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-16-2013, 07:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
ok cool, i'l give this a whirl a bit later today..sorry for not understanding the mask attack. |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-16-2013, 08:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
considering though it will still process the same keys, and appears to be running at the same keys/second rate...the only advantage would appear to be not having to create the dictionary, im still run... |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-16-2013, 09:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
wpa (2500) accel at 25, gpu at 40, on geforce 660 ti |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-17-2013, 01:05 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
any setting changes in the cmd line argument are minimal increase or decrease regardless of what settings have been used.
for a single mid level video card, i dont think looking at speed comparison... |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-17-2013, 10:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
well if this is sposed to be the more efficient command. since I don't like having the PC running non-stop for 4 days.
can you use the ?d argument and still limit it to a range? part of the benefi... |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-18-2013, 08:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
yeah i was asking how to do 9 - 9.5 type setup |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-20-2013, 06:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
So to be clear what I am reading
"Sure, you can easily do -1 012345 9?1?d?d?d?d?d?d "
So to get the remainder of the values in that 9000000000-999999999
After running that command would I chang... |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-20-2013, 06:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
So -1 creates for a custom character set that is called in the argument via the "?1"
And if I just put -1 0 it would run through 900000000 up until 9100000000?
and so forth for other number ranges ... |
|
squadx |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,855 |
02-20-2013, 09:54 PM |