|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Cool, many thanks atom. We all own u big time for the amount of time and effort u put into this. My hat goes off 2 u sir :)
I'll do some testing tnite hopefully. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,633 |
09-04-2012, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| Graph updated with v0.09b74 (see attached). |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-04-2012, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| OK run tests and attached graph of the results. Good news :) speeds are better than v0.081 now but there is a performance drop on the smallers lists now, 500 and 50000 hashes.
Have included Excel f... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-03-2012, 06:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| Hi atom, have created a graph, seems b62 is only slower with alot of hashes, see graph below:
https://home.btconnect.com/md5decrypter/oclhc-plus_graph.jpg
It's faster with fewer hashes, anything over... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-03-2012, 10:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| I always delete the "kernels" directory before extracting so it's totally clean. Tested b68, results same as b67 :( sry dude. I always do clean installs of the cat drivers new and I have cat 12.8 curr... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-02-2012, 07:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| OK, getting 1535M/sec with b67 using cat 12.6 so will update to cat 12.8 now.
UPDATE: With cat 12.8, results: 1538.7M/sec
Tested both with and without Crossfire.
Better, but no cigar :( |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-02-2012, 10:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| @atom will check b67 tmoz :) |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-02-2012, 12:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| @atom, got oclhc-plus v0.09b66 using cat 12.6, speed issue same:
v0.08
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 0 -a 3 -n 320 --remove -o foundMD5.txt -1 ?d?l 32_hex.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed: 2342.5M/sec
v0.09b66... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-01-2012, 09:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up
| KT819GM, if atom gets the distributed oclhc working on local network, the 8 GPU limitation will no longer be an issue as u can just cluster lots of GPU servers together meaning there would be no limit... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,551 |
09-01-2012, 11:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up
| Tested v0.09b60 with 1.6 mil hashes with Win7 x64:
v0.08
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 0 -a 3 -n 320 --remove -o foundMD5.txt -1 ?d?l 32_hex.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed: 2331.2M/sec
v0.09b60
oclHashcat-pl... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,551 |
09-01-2012, 01:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V56 is up
Post: RE: V56 is up
| Tnx atom :) in Barcelona atm but will be back in UK Friday so will do testing then. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
7,924 |
08-30-2012, 12:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Crossfire Enabled or Disabled?
Post: AMD Crossfire Enabled or Disabled?
| Been testing oclhc-plus and oclhc-lite with both Crossfire enabled and disabled on a Win7 x64 with AMD cat 12.8 drivers. The results are below:
oclhc-plus v0.08
Hashes: 1.6 mil
With Crossfire
... |
|
blandyuk |
User Contributions
|
1 |
8,015 |
08-27-2012, 09:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Thanks dude, yeah sorry I didnt post the oclhc-plus command-lines used. I did used the --bf-min=6 when using charset -1 ?d?l?u?s with mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1
All tests using same -n 320 and masks / lengths... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,158 |
08-24-2012, 03:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GPU slower than CPU?
Post: RE: GPU slower than CPU?
| Run a brute-force attack on those hashes instead, oclhc-plus might be just slow with your wordlist:
./cudaHashcat-plus32.bin -m 0 -a 3 -1 ?d?l?u example0.hash ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Post you results. |
|
blandyuk |
General Help
|
5 |
9,970 |
08-24-2012, 09:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Hi atom, been testing this today against v0.08 with a clean install of the cat 12.8 drivers on Win7 x64.
Results:
0.08
NTLM 10 hashes: 3060 mil/s
NTLM 1.6mil hashes: 1158 mil/s
MD5 1.6mil has... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,158 |
08-23-2012, 11:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: No reaction from the software
Post: RE: No reaction from the software
| I'd say that version doesn't even exist going on the basis that the current version is: v0.081
https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/
Also make sure: AMD users require Catalyst 12.4 or later |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,409 |
08-02-2012, 05:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Congrats for CMIYC 2012
Post: RE: Congrats for CMIYC 2012
| Thanks mastercracker, this is my first Defcon Challenge and it was really good fun. Obviously I'm Team Hashcat all the way :) |
|
blandyuk |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
28,411 |
07-30-2012, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat-GUI and ATI card
Post: RE: Hashcat-GUI and ATI card
| You could try my flavour of the GUI, it's still in BETA but works great:
https://www.md5decrypter.co.uk/downloads.aspx |
|
blandyuk |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
16,445 |
07-05-2012, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: which mainboard has much pcie ?
Post: RE: which mainboard has much pcie ?
| MSI Big Bang series supports 8 PCI-E v2 x16:
8 x PCI-E 16x
https://www.msi.com/product/mb/Big-Bang-Marshal--B3-.html
7 x PCI-E 16x
https://www.msi.com/product/mb/Big-Bang-XPower-II.html
The s... |
|
blandyuk |
Hardware
|
2 |
8,896 |
06-29-2012, 12:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Operating Systems used by hashcat users
Post: RE: Operating Systems used by hashcat users
| Think I need to reword the poll question:
What primary OS do you use with hashcat / oclhashcat? |
|
blandyuk |
Organisation and Events
|
10 |
28,248 |
06-08-2012, 06:01 PM |
