|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Hi atom, been testing this today against v0.08 with a clean install of the cat 12.8 drivers on Win7 x64.
Results:
0.08
NTLM 10 hashes: 3060 mil/s
NTLM 1.6mil hashes: 1158 mil/s
MD5 1.6mil has... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,155 |
08-23-2012, 11:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Thanks dude, yeah sorry I didnt post the oclhc-plus command-lines used. I did used the --bf-min=6 when using charset -1 ?d?l?u?s with mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1
All tests using same -n 320 and masks / lengths... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,155 |
08-24-2012, 03:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V56 is up
Post: RE: V56 is up
| Tnx atom :) in Barcelona atm but will be back in UK Friday so will do testing then. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
7,922 |
08-30-2012, 12:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up
| Tested v0.09b60 with 1.6 mil hashes with Win7 x64:
v0.08
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 0 -a 3 -n 320 --remove -o foundMD5.txt -1 ?d?l 32_hex.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed: 2331.2M/sec
v0.09b60
oclHashcat-pl... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,547 |
09-01-2012, 01:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up
| KT819GM, if atom gets the distributed oclhc working on local network, the 8 GPU limitation will no longer be an issue as u can just cluster lots of GPU servers together meaning there would be no limit... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,547 |
09-01-2012, 11:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| @atom, got oclhc-plus v0.09b66 using cat 12.6, speed issue same:
v0.08
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 0 -a 3 -n 320 --remove -o foundMD5.txt -1 ?d?l 32_hex.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed: 2342.5M/sec
v0.09b66... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-01-2012, 09:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| @atom will check b67 tmoz :) |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-02-2012, 12:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| OK, getting 1535M/sec with b67 using cat 12.6 so will update to cat 12.8 now.
UPDATE: With cat 12.8, results: 1538.7M/sec
Tested both with and without Crossfire.
Better, but no cigar :( |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-02-2012, 10:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| I always delete the "kernels" directory before extracting so it's totally clean. Tested b68, results same as b67 :( sry dude. I always do clean installs of the cat drivers new and I have cat 12.8 curr... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-02-2012, 07:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| Hi atom, have created a graph, seems b62 is only slower with alot of hashes, see graph below:
https://home.btconnect.com/md5decrypter/oclhc-plus_graph.jpg
It's faster with fewer hashes, anything over... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-03-2012, 10:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| OK run tests and attached graph of the results. Good news :) speeds are better than v0.081 now but there is a performance drop on the smallers lists now, 500 and 50000 hashes.
Have included Excel f... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-03-2012, 06:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| Graph updated with v0.09b74 (see attached). |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,848 |
09-04-2012, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Cool, many thanks atom. We all own u big time for the amount of time and effort u put into this. My hat goes off 2 u sir :)
I'll do some testing tnite hopefully. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,618 |
09-04-2012, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Updated graph attached with v0.09rc1 |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,618 |
09-04-2012, 09:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Go ahead, although I now use 1 5870 and 1 5850 now :) will have 3 x 5870s soon and will look at upgrading more after that. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,618 |
09-05-2012, 12:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Quick one, -m 3000 (LM) now only works with 16 char hex hashes, not the full 32 char hex :(
Real pain! |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,618 |
09-06-2012, 09:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| OK, but it's easier if it supports the 32 hex hashes as well as 16, not like its hard to do as all it need to do it split the 32 hex hash into 2 x 16 hex hashes.
I'll just have 2 write a script 2 do ... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,618 |
09-06-2012, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.11b39
Post: oclHashcat-lite v0.11b39
| Noticed a speed issue with -m 3000 (LM) hashes:
oclHashcat-lite-0.11b39
Speed: 661.8M/s
Cmd: oclHashcat-lite64.exe -m 3000 -n 320 -o foundLM.txt 9b957cc6ab97cbf8 ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a
oclHashcat-plus... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
3,020 |
09-06-2012, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug
Post: RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug
| I tested it with these 2, obviously minus the passwords:
neCYnaUa.vV4c:dragon
neS7QCdrq4MGM:cookie
Found them both, (obviously), and did not mess the hashes up. Does this only happen with lots of DE... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,743 |
10-22-2012, 09:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Windows 8 64 and AMD 12.10/12.11 beta opinions
Post: RE: Windows 8 64 and AMD 12.10/12.11 beta opinions
| I have already run oclHashcat 0.09 on Win8 x64 with cat 12.9 and it works ok. No speed increases thou obviously. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,283 |
10-27-2012, 12:56 AM |
