|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: create hash file from cap
Post: RE: create hash file from cap
| Yeah, the sourceforge one doesn't work on Win, I have told the developer and they did get back to me but not heard anything since.
eljolot the latest version of aircrack-ng v1.1 for Win does not have... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
61,172 |
01-18-2013, 06:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 470 or Radeon 5970?
Post: RE: GTX 470 or Radeon 5970?
| lol Radeon HD 5970 is well faster, see 4 yourself:
https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,970 |
02-04-2013, 01:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: RE: Please vote
| I'm in favour but, its a shame brute-force it taking a hit. I presume the classes / interfaces are linked in hashcat which is why this is causing this to happen?
Back in the old days, hashcat was spl... |
|
blandyuk |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,204 |
02-10-2017, 09:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970
| I know 7970s are faster do to memory speeds but I found the 6000 series to be a bit power hungry. See below:
https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php
5870: MD5 speed: 5821 ~ Watts: 188
6970: MD5 speed: 5878 ~ ... |
|
blandyuk |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,270 |
10-12-2012, 10:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970
| Speeds on 5870s for you with 1 x SHA512(Unix) using -n 160:
Code:
--
1 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 15158 c/s
4 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 60422 c/s
1 x 5870, 900MHz core, 1250MHz mem:... |
|
blandyuk |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,270 |
10-12-2012, 03:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat-plus64.bin 0.07
Post: RE: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat...
| I got this wrong once and felt stupid after speaking to atom :) Always read the "GPU Driver and SDK Requirements" for all hashcat projects. |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
17,941 |
02-27-2012, 01:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Configuration for speed up ocl ?
Post: RE: Configuration for speed up ocl ?
| For oclHashcat-plus 0.081, u need AMD users require Catalyst 12.4 or later otherwise you'll get incorrect hash matches. For oclHashcat-lite u need AMD users require Catalyst 12.2. |
|
blandyuk |
General Help
|
7 |
16,275 |
05-14-2012, 02:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat-GUI and ATI card
Post: RE: Hashcat-GUI and ATI card
| You could try my flavour of the GUI, it's still in BETA but works great:
https://www.md5decrypter.co.uk/downloads.aspx |
|
blandyuk |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
16,445 |
07-05-2012, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Hi atom, been testing this today against v0.08 with a clean install of the cat 12.8 drivers on Win7 x64.
Results:
0.08
NTLM 10 hashes: 3060 mil/s
NTLM 1.6mil hashes: 1158 mil/s
MD5 1.6mil has... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,158 |
08-23-2012, 11:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
| Thanks dude, yeah sorry I didnt post the oclhc-plus command-lines used. I did used the --bf-min=6 when using charset -1 ?d?l?u?s with mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1
All tests using same -n 320 and masks / lengths... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,158 |
08-24-2012, 03:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| Another update on this, when I use rules, it's runs at 1736.6k c/s :( |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 12:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| Ah I got it, removing -n 320 fixed the issue. Not sure what was going on there. |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 12:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| No, when I set -i --increment-min=6 with mask ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d, it starts a ?d as u can see it in the statuses.
Also, why is len 6 ?d faster than len 7 ?d
??? |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 01:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| Coming back to this one, been trying Combinator attacks using fingerprinting. Used the expander to generate all possibilities, about 1450000 and then tried to do a Combinator attack on the 7000 IPB ha... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-25-2012, 09:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| First, in this mode, it seems to ignore the increment option. I have the below which clearly states to start from len 6 but it starts from len 1:
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2811 -a 3 -n 320 --gpu-tem... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 10:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HashcatGUI v0.19.beta6 Released
Post: HashcatGUI v0.19.beta6 Released
| Hi all, I've been working on an alternative to the original hashcat-gui so here is the latest version. It's only Windows based I'm afraid :( I love Linux to and will see about a version for it soon.
... |
|
blandyuk |
User Contributions
|
7 |
15,962 |
10-16-2012, 10:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: n00b question about hashcat
Post: RE: n00b question about hashcat
| Dude, hashcat works out-the-box on all Windows platforms. ocl and cuda version need the correct driver versions but CPU will just work. If not, your doing something epicly wrong!
Show us what command... |
|
blandyuk |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
13,510 |
10-18-2012, 12:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug
Post: RE: DES(Unix): Terrible Bug
| I tested it with these 2, obviously minus the passwords:
neCYnaUa.vV4c:dragon
neS7QCdrq4MGM:cookie
Found them both, (obviously), and did not mess the hashes up. Does this only happen with lots of DE... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,747 |
10-22-2012, 09:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Results: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3-12.8
Post: Results: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3-12.8
| OK, I can see no one else has posted some test results for atom with regards to latest beta for lite so here u go atom, (see attached).
4 x 5870 with 950MHz core and 1300MHz mem.
Cmd: oclHashcat-lit... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,854 |
12-13-2012, 12:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Results: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: Results: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3-12.8
| Thanks forumhero, I know the stock core is slower on 5970's but I don't do to bad nearly matching your 3 x 5970's with my 4 x 5870s OC :P I would like to get 4 x 7970's but too expensive. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,854 |
12-13-2012, 11:18 AM |
