|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| Graph updated with v0.09b74 (see attached). |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,856 |
09-04-2012, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Cool, many thanks atom. We all own u big time for the amount of time and effort u put into this. My hat goes off 2 u sir :)
I'll do some testing tnite hopefully. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,633 |
09-04-2012, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Updated graph attached with v0.09rc1 |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,633 |
09-04-2012, 09:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Go ahead, although I now use 1 5870 and 1 5850 now :) will have 3 x 5870s soon and will look at upgrading more after that. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,633 |
09-05-2012, 12:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Quick one, -m 3000 (LM) now only works with 16 char hex hashes, not the full 32 char hex :(
Real pain! |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,633 |
09-06-2012, 09:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| OK, but it's easier if it supports the 32 hex hashes as well as 16, not like its hard to do as all it need to do it split the 32 hex hash into 2 x 16 hex hashes.
I'll just have 2 write a script 2 do ... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,633 |
09-06-2012, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.11b39
Post: oclHashcat-lite v0.11b39
| Noticed a speed issue with -m 3000 (LM) hashes:
oclHashcat-lite-0.11b39
Speed: 661.8M/s
Cmd: oclHashcat-lite64.exe -m 3000 -n 320 -o foundLM.txt 9b957cc6ab97cbf8 ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a
oclHashcat-plus... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
3,023 |
09-06-2012, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus
Post: RE: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus
| Problem will be the Hashcat GUI is so out-of-date the commands will be totally wrong. |
|
blandyuk |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
19,782 |
09-11-2012, 03:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
Post: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
| Just tried to crack 1 bcrypt $2a$ hashes and plus crashed out on me :( managed to stop it crashing by lowering -n 1 but only getting 91 c/s
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 3200 -a 0 -n 1 --gpu-temp-disable ... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,270 |
09-12-2012, 12:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
Post: RE: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
| Yup, clean install so that's not it. |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,270 |
09-12-2012, 01:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus
Post: RE: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus
| Yes, didn't mention my one yet but currently updating it so it'll work with plus v0.09 so check it soon :) |
|
blandyuk |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
19,782 |
09-12-2012, 02:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
Post: RE: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
| Hi atom, sry 4 delay as been major busy. OK, just tested -m 3200 with 3 of my 4 x 5870s, with -n 1 all is OK but slow, as soon as I increase it, it totally fails, black screen for a 5-10 secs, then at... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,270 |
09-19-2012, 10:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| First, in this mode, it seems to ignore the increment option. I have the below which clearly states to start from len 6 but it starts from len 1:
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2811 -a 3 -n 320 --gpu-tem... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 10:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| Another update on this, when I use rules, it's runs at 1736.6k c/s :( |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 12:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| Ah I got it, removing -n 320 fixed the issue. Not sure what was going on there. |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 12:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| No, when I set -i --increment-min=6 with mask ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d, it starts a ?d as u can see it in the statuses.
Also, why is len 6 ?d faster than len 7 ?d
??? |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-21-2012, 01:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| Coming back to this one, been trying Combinator attacks using fingerprinting. Used the expander to generate all possibilities, about 1450000 and then tried to do a Combinator attack on the 7000 IPB ha... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,565 |
09-25-2012, 09:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trouble Running Command
Post: RE: Trouble Running Command
| Your custom charset is wrong, only use ? when using predefined charsets. Change it to the below:
hashcat-cli64.exe -m 1410 -a 3 -o C:\Users\admin\temp.text --pw-min=8 -1 ABCDEFabcdef12345!@#$% C:\U... |
|
blandyuk |
General Help
|
4 |
7,419 |
10-10-2012, 08:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970
| I know 7970s are faster do to memory speeds but I found the 6000 series to be a bit power hungry. See below:
https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php
5870: MD5 speed: 5821 ~ Watts: 188
6970: MD5 speed: 5878 ~ ... |
|
blandyuk |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,270 |
10-12-2012, 10:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970
| Speeds on 5870s for you with 1 x SHA512(Unix) using -n 160:
Code:
--
1 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 15158 c/s
4 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 60422 c/s
1 x 5870, 900MHz core, 1250MHz mem:... |
|
blandyuk |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,270 |
10-12-2012, 03:57 PM |
