Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from October 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author [asc] Forum Replies Views Posted
    Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up

Graph updated with v0.09b74 (see attached).
blandyuk Beta Tester 58 54,861 09-04-2012, 11:23 AM
    Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1

Cool, many thanks atom. We all own u big time for the amount of time and effort u put into this. My hat goes off 2 u sir :) I'll do some testing tnite hopefully.
blandyuk Beta Tester 24 22,634 09-04-2012, 08:37 PM
    Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1

Updated graph attached with v0.09rc1
blandyuk Beta Tester 24 22,634 09-04-2012, 09:03 PM
    Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1

Go ahead, although I now use 1 5870 and 1 5850 now :) will have 3 x 5870s soon and will look at upgrading more after that.
blandyuk Beta Tester 24 22,634 09-05-2012, 12:03 AM
    Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1

Quick one, -m 3000 (LM) now only works with 16 char hex hashes, not the full 32 char hex :( Real pain!
blandyuk Beta Tester 24 22,634 09-06-2012, 09:45 AM
    Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1

OK, but it's easier if it supports the 32 hex hashes as well as 16, not like its hard to do as all it need to do it split the 32 hex hash into 2 x 16 hex hashes. I'll just have 2 write a script 2 do ...
blandyuk Beta Tester 24 22,634 09-06-2012, 09:58 AM
    Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.11b39
Post: oclHashcat-lite v0.11b39

Noticed a speed issue with -m 3000 (LM) hashes: oclHashcat-lite-0.11b39 Speed: 661.8M/s Cmd: oclHashcat-lite64.exe -m 3000 -n 320 -o foundLM.txt 9b957cc6ab97cbf8 ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a oclHashcat-plus...
blandyuk Beta Tester 1 3,023 09-06-2012, 10:08 AM
    Thread: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus
Post: RE: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus

Problem will be the Hashcat GUI is so out-of-date the commands will be totally wrong.
blandyuk Old hashcat Support 5 19,784 09-11-2012, 03:31 PM
    Thread: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
Post: -m 3200 issue - v0.09

Just tried to crack 1 bcrypt $2a$ hashes and plus crashed out on me :( managed to stop it crashing by lowering -n 1 but only getting 91 c/s oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 3200 -a 0 -n 1 --gpu-temp-disable ...
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 4 8,270 09-12-2012, 12:11 AM
    Thread: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
Post: RE: -m 3200 issue - v0.09

Yup, clean install so that's not it.
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 4 8,270 09-12-2012, 01:43 PM
    Thread: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus
Post: RE: Hascat GUI cannot start cudahashcat plus

Yes, didn't mention my one yet but currently updating it so it'll work with plus v0.09 so check it soon :)
blandyuk Old hashcat Support 5 19,784 09-12-2012, 02:14 PM
    Thread: -m 3200 issue - v0.09
Post: RE: -m 3200 issue - v0.09

Hi atom, sry 4 delay as been major busy. OK, just tested -m 3200 with 3 of my 4 x 5870s, with -n 1 all is OK but slow, as soon as I increase it, it totally fails, black screen for a 5-10 secs, then at...
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 4 8,270 09-19-2012, 10:20 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

First, in this mode, it seems to ignore the increment option. I have the below which clearly states to start from len 6 but it starts from len 1: oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2811 -a 3 -n 320 --gpu-tem...
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-21-2012, 10:56 AM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

Another update on this, when I use rules, it's runs at 1736.6k c/s :(
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-21-2012, 12:06 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

Ah I got it, removing -n 320 fixed the issue. Not sure what was going on there.
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-21-2012, 12:10 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

No, when I set -i --increment-min=6 with mask ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d, it starts a ?d as u can see it in the statuses. Also, why is len 6 ?d faster than len 7 ?d ???
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-21-2012, 01:49 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

Coming back to this one, been trying Combinator attacks using fingerprinting. Used the expander to generate all possibilities, about 1450000 and then tried to do a Combinator attack on the 7000 IPB ha...
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-25-2012, 09:56 AM
    Thread: Trouble Running Command
Post: RE: Trouble Running Command

Your custom charset is wrong, only use ? when using predefined charsets. Change it to the below: hashcat-cli64.exe -m 1410 -a 3 -o C:\Users\admin\temp.text --pw-min=8 -1 ABCDEFabcdef12345!@#$% C:\U...
blandyuk General Help 4 7,419 10-10-2012, 08:05 PM
    Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970

I know 7970s are faster do to memory speeds but I found the 6000 series to be a bit power hungry. See below: https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php 5870: MD5 speed: 5821 ~ Watts: 188 6970: MD5 speed: 5878 ~ ...
blandyuk Hardware 8 19,270 10-12-2012, 10:53 AM
    Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970

Speeds on 5870s for you with 1 x SHA512(Unix) using -n 160: Code: -- 1 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 15158 c/s 4 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 60422 c/s 1 x 5870, 900MHz core, 1250MHz mem:...
blandyuk Hardware 8 19,270 10-12-2012, 03:57 PM