Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
@atom will check b67 tmoz :) |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,861 |
09-02-2012, 12:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
OK, getting 1535M/sec with b67 using cat 12.6 so will update to cat 12.8 now.
UPDATE: With cat 12.8, results: 1538.7M/sec
Tested both with and without Crossfire.
Better, but no cigar :( |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,861 |
09-02-2012, 10:42 AM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
I always delete the "kernels" directory before extracting so it's totally clean. Tested b68, results same as b67 :( sry dude. I always do clean installs of the cat drivers new and I have cat 12.8 curr... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,861 |
09-02-2012, 07:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
Hi atom, have created a graph, seems b62 is only slower with alot of hashes, see graph below:
https://home.btconnect.com/md5decrypter/oclhc-plus_graph.jpg
It's faster with fewer hashes, anything over... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,861 |
09-03-2012, 10:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
OK run tests and attached graph of the results. Good news :) speeds are better than v0.081 now but there is a performance drop on the smallers lists now, 500 and 50000 hashes.
Have included Excel f... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,861 |
09-03-2012, 06:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
Graph updated with v0.09b74 (see attached). |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,861 |
09-04-2012, 11:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up
Tested v0.09b60 with 1.6 mil hashes with Win7 x64:
v0.08
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 0 -a 3 -n 320 --remove -o foundMD5.txt -1 ?d?l 32_hex.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed: 2331.2M/sec
v0.09b60
oclHashcat-pl... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,551 |
09-01-2012, 01:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up
KT819GM, if atom gets the distributed oclhc working on local network, the 8 GPU limitation will no longer be an issue as u can just cluster lots of GPU servers together meaning there would be no limit... |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,551 |
09-01-2012, 11:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: V56 is up
Post: RE: V56 is up
Tnx atom :) in Barcelona atm but will be back in UK Friday so will do testing then. |
|
blandyuk |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
7,924 |
08-30-2012, 12:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: Trouble Running Command
Post: RE: Trouble Running Command
Your custom charset is wrong, only use ? when using predefined charsets. Change it to the below:
hashcat-cli64.exe -m 1410 -a 3 -o C:\Users\admin\temp.text --pw-min=8 -1 ABCDEFabcdef12345!@#$% C:\U... |
|
blandyuk |
General Help
|
4 |
7,419 |
10-10-2012, 08:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Another update on this, when I use rules, it's runs at 1736.6k c/s :( |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,568 |
09-21-2012, 12:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Ah I got it, removing -n 320 fixed the issue. Not sure what was going on there. |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,568 |
09-21-2012, 12:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
No, when I set -i --increment-min=6 with mask ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d, it starts a ?d as u can see it in the statuses.
Also, why is len 6 ?d faster than len 7 ?d
??? |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,568 |
09-21-2012, 01:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Coming back to this one, been trying Combinator attacks using fingerprinting. Used the expander to generate all possibilities, about 1450000 and then tried to do a Combinator attack on the 7000 IPB ha... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,568 |
09-25-2012, 09:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970
I know 7970s are faster do to memory speeds but I found the 6000 series to be a bit power hungry. See below:
https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php
5870: MD5 speed: 5821 ~ Watts: 188
6970: MD5 speed: 5878 ~ ... |
|
blandyuk |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,270 |
10-12-2012, 10:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Speeds on 5870s for you with 1 x SHA512(Unix) using -n 160:
Code:
--
1 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 15158 c/s
4 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 60422 c/s
1 x 5870, 900MHz core, 1250MHz mem:... |
|
blandyuk |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,270 |
10-12-2012, 03:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: speed for 2 x GTX 690
Post: RE: speed for 2 x GTX 690
Some graphs here for a few cards:
https://ht4u.net/reviews/2012/nvidia_geforce_gtx_690_im_test/index40.php
Your better with AMD cards m8 :) even my old ATI Radeon HD 5850 beats those nVidia cards... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,608 |
05-09-2012, 05:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
SL3...
https://home.btconnect.com/md5decrypter/images/bender-bite-ass.jpg |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,553 |
01-03-2013, 11:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Awesome forumhero :) am trying to get some 5970's for my rigs but trying to get them with Accelero coolers on as can't really get the coolers anymore :(
Am currently @ 5 x Radeon 5870's but have a 59... |
|
blandyuk |
General Talk
|
29 |
55,580 |
01-11-2013, 12:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
Post: RE: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
ATI Radeon HD 5850 @ 765 MHz
Switches: "-n 160 --gpu-loops 1024"
Code:
--
Digests: 1 entries, 1 unique
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
Platforms: 1
Platform #1: Advanced M... |
|
blandyuk |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
41 |
128,069 |
09-17-2010, 10:33 AM |