Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from October 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post [asc] Author Forum Replies Views Posted
    Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up

@atom will check b67 tmoz :)
blandyuk Beta Tester 58 54,861 09-02-2012, 12:55 AM
    Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up

OK, getting 1535M/sec with b67 using cat 12.6 so will update to cat 12.8 now. UPDATE: With cat 12.8, results: 1538.7M/sec Tested both with and without Crossfire. Better, but no cigar :(
blandyuk Beta Tester 58 54,861 09-02-2012, 10:42 AM
    Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up

I always delete the "kernels" directory before extracting so it's totally clean. Tested b68, results same as b67 :( sry dude. I always do clean installs of the cat drivers new and I have cat 12.8 curr...
blandyuk Beta Tester 58 54,861 09-02-2012, 07:06 PM
    Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up

Hi atom, have created a graph, seems b62 is only slower with alot of hashes, see graph below: https://home.btconnect.com/md5decrypter/oclhc-plus_graph.jpg It's faster with fewer hashes, anything over...
blandyuk Beta Tester 58 54,861 09-03-2012, 10:12 AM
    Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up

OK run tests and attached graph of the results. Good news :) speeds are better than v0.081 now but there is a performance drop on the smallers lists now, 500 and 50000 hashes. Have included Excel f...
blandyuk Beta Tester 58 54,861 09-03-2012, 06:28 PM
    Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up

Graph updated with v0.09b74 (see attached).
blandyuk Beta Tester 58 54,861 09-04-2012, 11:23 AM
    Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up

Tested v0.09b60 with 1.6 mil hashes with Win7 x64: v0.08 oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 0 -a 3 -n 320 --remove -o foundMD5.txt -1 ?d?l 32_hex.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 Speed: 2331.2M/sec v0.09b60 oclHashcat-pl...
blandyuk Beta Tester 14 14,551 09-01-2012, 01:19 AM
    Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up

KT819GM, if atom gets the distributed oclhc working on local network, the 8 GPU limitation will no longer be an issue as u can just cluster lots of GPU servers together meaning there would be no limit...
blandyuk Beta Tester 14 14,551 09-01-2012, 11:21 AM
    Thread: V56 is up
Post: RE: V56 is up

Tnx atom :) in Barcelona atm but will be back in UK Friday so will do testing then.
blandyuk Beta Tester 9 7,924 08-30-2012, 12:10 AM
    Thread: Trouble Running Command
Post: RE: Trouble Running Command

Your custom charset is wrong, only use ? when using predefined charsets. Change it to the below: hashcat-cli64.exe -m 1410 -a 3 -o C:\Users\admin\temp.text --pw-min=8 -1 ABCDEFabcdef12345!@#$% C:\U...
blandyuk General Help 4 7,419 10-10-2012, 08:05 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

Another update on this, when I use rules, it's runs at 1736.6k c/s :(
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-21-2012, 12:06 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

Ah I got it, removing -n 320 fixed the issue. Not sure what was going on there.
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-21-2012, 12:10 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

No, when I set -i --increment-min=6 with mask ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d, it starts a ?d as u can see it in the statuses. Also, why is len 6 ?d faster than len 7 ?d ???
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-21-2012, 01:49 PM
    Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811

Coming back to this one, been trying Combinator attacks using fingerprinting. Used the expander to generate all possibilities, about 1450000 and then tried to do a Combinator attack on the 7000 IPB ha...
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 7 15,568 09-25-2012, 09:56 AM
    Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970

I know 7970s are faster do to memory speeds but I found the 6000 series to be a bit power hungry. See below: https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php 5870: MD5 speed: 5821 ~ Watts: 188 6970: MD5 speed: 5878 ~ ...
blandyuk Hardware 8 19,270 10-12-2012, 10:53 AM
    Thread: Speed on Radeon HD6970
Post: RE: Speed on Radeon HD6970

Speeds on 5870s for you with 1 x SHA512(Unix) using -n 160: Code: -- 1 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 15158 c/s 4 x 5870, 850MHz core, 1200MHz mem: 60422 c/s 1 x 5870, 900MHz core, 1250MHz mem:...
blandyuk Hardware 8 19,270 10-12-2012, 03:57 PM
    Thread: speed for 2 x GTX 690
Post: RE: speed for 2 x GTX 690

Some graphs here for a few cards: https://ht4u.net/reviews/2012/nvidia_geforce_gtx_690_im_test/index40.php Your better with AMD cards m8 :) even my old ATI Radeon HD 5850 beats those nVidia cards...
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 2 6,608 05-09-2012, 05:09 PM
    Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again

SL3... https://home.btconnect.com/md5decrypter/images/bender-bite-ass.jpg
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 71 191,553 01-03-2013, 11:42 PM
    Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds

Awesome forumhero :) am trying to get some 5970's for my rigs but trying to get them with Accelero coolers on as can't really get the coolers anymore :( Am currently @ 5 x Radeon 5870's but have a 59...
blandyuk General Talk 29 55,580 01-11-2013, 12:04 AM
    Thread: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
Post: RE: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.

ATI Radeon HD 5850 @ 765 MHz Switches: "-n 160 --gpu-loops 1024" Code: -- Digests: 1 entries, 1 unique Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes Platforms: 1 Platform #1: Advanced M...
blandyuk Very old oclHashcat Support 41 128,069 09-17-2010, 10:33 AM