|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Good news: 11.9 only use one core of cpu !
Post: Good news: 11.9 only use one core of cpu !
| I tested it. No matter how many gpus are used , oclhashcat only use 100% cpu of one core!
[please move my post to "hardware"] |
|
nobody |
Hardware
|
2 |
7,611 |
09-24-2011, 08:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: no more dummy plugs on windows?
Post: RE: no more dummy plugs on windows?
| Never use dummy plugs or monitors for years! |
|
nobody |
Hardware
|
5 |
13,993 |
09-24-2011, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
Post: RE: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
| As atom tested, hd5970 (2GPU) is 20% faster than hd7970 , but it's price is 50%, So buying hd5970 is better. Am I right? |
|
nobody |
Hardware
|
52 |
175,166 |
01-15-2012, 03:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
Post: RE: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
| Vulpix, I agree with you!
As you said, My only goal is cracking hashes, So I prefer 5970 for it's 120% performance on 50% price. And I want to ask Atom if there are any driver issues while using oclh... |
|
nobody |
Hardware
|
52 |
175,166 |
01-15-2012, 04:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat rule files
Post: RE: Hashcat rule files
| Please check d3ad0ne_23.8K.rule which on https://hashcat.net/urules/, This file contain many "#NAME?". I think you use excel to export this file so that all strings start with "=" will change to "#NAM... |
|
nobody |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
19,374 |
01-10-2011, 03:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What's wrong? the answer is incorrect
Post: RE: What's wrong? the answer is incorrect
| Thanks you. You are right! |
|
nobody |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,169 |
10-02-2011, 12:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What's wrong? the answer is incorrect
Post: What's wrong? the answer is incorrect
| Hashcat 0.37 shows the answer is "sys" :
but md5(lusgUYkNU6JxJKSBsOZGiZTQGm3StdrKsys) =435857510eac564d8980dc919acc485a
Quote:
--
D:\hashcat>Hashcat-cli64.exe -a 0 -m 1 hash.txt dict.txt
I... |
|
nobody |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,169 |
10-02-2011, 06:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug report abount rule files
Post: Bug report abount rule files
| Please check d3ad0ne_23.8K.rule which on https://hashcat.net/urules/, This file contains many "#NAME?". I think you use excel to export this file so that all strings start with "=" will be changed to "... |
|
nobody |
User Contributions
|
0 |
5,153 |
01-10-2011, 12:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: BUG REPORT(oclhashcat 0.25)
Post: BUG REPORT(oclhashcat 0.25)
|
Program seems to run fine, but progress is always the same (9.53%).
This happened many times (for different file or different parameters) , but sometimes it can be finished with no problem.
oclHashc... |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
8,680 |
02-09-2011, 05:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
| Using plus to replace old oclhashcat is a good idea! |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
8 |
29,854 |
01-04-2012, 06:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
| How can we get the 0.07b3? |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,317 |
12-19-2011, 07:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclhashcat-lite v0.06 Time Bomb
Post: [split] oclhashcat-lite v0.06 Time Bomb
| I want to use oclHashcat-0.26 too , it's faster than oclhashcat-plus 0.07. What can I do? |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,746 |
01-02-2012, 05:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhas...
| I found plus is much slower than oclhashcat 0.26.
For cracking 700m md5 hashes.
oclhashcat 1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -->3300M/s
oclhashcat-plus 1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d... |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,704 |
01-02-2012, 05:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
|
chort Wrote: (01-02-2012, 05:15 AM)
--
Try increasing the -n value. It makes a big difference in some cases. Also for some hash types I've found that increasing --gpu-loops helps.
--
I tried many d... |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,704 |
01-02-2012, 05:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
|
atom Wrote: (01-02-2012, 03:53 PM)
--
as chort already said, increase the -n value:
oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80
--
Increasing -n or --gpu-loops do... |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,704 |
01-02-2012, 04:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
|
atom Wrote: (01-02-2012, 11:16 AM)
--
plus is much faster than old oclHashcat. otherwise i wouldnt have changed :) 700000000 hashes at once is such a huge amount of hashes that the results are unpred... |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,704 |
01-02-2012, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
|
forumhero Wrote: (01-02-2012, 08:11 PM)
--
what is the GPU utilization at during the run?
--
Gpu usage :
plus: 97% 98% or 99%.
oclhashcat 0.26: 94%
|
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,704 |
01-03-2012, 09:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
| Thanks for replying. Yes, I tested.Plus 0.07 is faster than reglar 0.26 if the hash count less than 100.
And I found that plus 0.07 is 10% slower than plus 0.06 while cracking 70000 md5 hashes (oclHa... |
|
nobody |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,704 |
01-03-2012, 05:07 PM |
