|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: ASRock Z87 Pro4
Post: ASRock Z87 Pro4
| Hello,
will I be able to put two same cards in this (https://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/Z87%20Pro4/) one? (it says it has "1 x PCIe 3.0 x16, 1 x PCIe 2.0 x16, 2 x PCIe 2.0 x1" I'm not sure) |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,973 |
02-21-2014, 10:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)APUs
Post: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)APUs
| Hi,
I understand that it's probably not of such an importance due to performance reasons, but is the Iris Pro 5200 GPU supported? If not, what performance do you estimate to expect of it (I mean the p... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
9 |
21,902 |
09-27-2013, 07:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 285
Post: R9 285
| wiki for details (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_Rx_200_Series). Awaiting benchmarks :) (they may be similar but 60 watt less consumption) In games the 280 and 285 perform basically the same... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,171 |
09-02-2014, 05:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ASRock Z87 Pro4
Post: RE: ASRock Z87 Pro4
| Ok. I was unsure because it says "1 x PCIe 3.0 x16, 1 x PCIe 2.0 x16" not "2 x PCIe 3.0 x16", but if it doesn't make a difference (for hashcat at least, not gaming) that's good. |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,973 |
02-21-2014, 04:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ASRock Z87 Pro4
Post: RE: ASRock Z87 Pro4
| Thanks for noticing, I may let the case be open. Cards will be 280X (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_Rx_200_Series#Chipset_table) (I know its a rebranded Tahiti HD 7970, but what matters is it... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,973 |
02-22-2014, 10:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmarks from NVidia's GTX 980
Post: RE: Benchmarks from NVidia's GTX 980
| interested in 970 benchmarks. there's supposed to be a 20nm version coming later? wonder if it consumes even less watts. I might get a 20nm 970. |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
10 |
81,914 |
09-25-2014, 02:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 750 TI
Post: RE: GTX 750 TI
| Thanks for better support since oclHashcat v1.21. Which NVidia card can replace a AMD 280X now that you use the new sm_50 instructions? I want to replace it since AMD's Linux support is worse than NVi... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
9 |
23,508 |
06-04-2014, 12:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v0.49
Post: RE: hashcat v0.49
| On Ubuntu 14.04:
Code:
--
hashcat-0.49$ ./hashcat-cli64.bin --benchmark
[...]
Enter YES in uppercase if you accept this EULA:
YES
Initializing hashcat v0.49 with 4 threads and 32mb segment-size...
... |
|
ocl |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
22 |
55,978 |
01-23-2015, 05:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v0.49
Post: RE: hashcat v0.49
| Here's with AVX2
Code:
--
hashcat-0.49$ ./hashcat-cliAVX2.bin --benchmark
Initializing hashcat v0.49 with 4 threads and 32mb segment-size...
Device...........: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4570 CPU @ 3.... |
|
ocl |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
22 |
55,978 |
01-27-2015, 01:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v0.49
Post: RE: hashcat v0.49
| Indeed it hasn't. Back then I decided on purpose not to get 8 "cores" because these are not real cores and can boost only ~30% (don't know how much it with Hashcat is) and the price didn't outfit the ... |
|
ocl |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
22 |
55,978 |
01-27-2015, 07:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)APUs
Post: RE: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)A...
| Ok, but since it's neither AMD, nor Nvidia, it's probably hard to say what the performance of this "GT650M" would be like (I mean an expected factor of like 3x more if it's going to be more AMD-like, ... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
9 |
21,902 |
09-27-2013, 08:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)APUs
Post: RE: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)A...
| Ok, research (radix, actually Rolf needs to research this too :D):
Intel 40 EUs -> 320 ALUs
GT650M has 384
1Intel shader != 1Nvidia shader
Rolf, 0.2GHz is the non-turbo modus (https://en.wikipedia.or... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
9 |
21,902 |
09-27-2013, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)APUs
Post: RE: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)A...
| Ok, I understand you guys are probably more info cracking/hacking than me and are more likely to buy a Desktop PC with a >200€ card just for hashing alone, not gaming. But think about how many I... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
9 |
21,902 |
09-27-2013, 09:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)APUs
Post: RE: Intel Iris Pro 5200 and other current (Intel)A...
| Alright, thanks for the clarification, epixoip. |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
9 |
21,902 |
09-28-2013, 02:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX 980 / GTX 970 (Compute performance added)
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX 980 / GTX 970 (Compute performance ...
| All these benchmark/review sites should add Hashcat to their list.
165watt TDP is indeed very good. Still waiting for the hc benchmarks. |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
11 |
37,911 |
09-19-2014, 08:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.21
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.21
| It's interesting to know which NVidia card has similar speeds of a 7970/280x (WPA/WPA2) now. |
|
ocl |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
10 |
41,425 |
05-28-2014, 03:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 280X speed
Post: RE: R9 280X speed
| I'm getting ~125 kH/s running Ubuntu 14.04 64bit (one handshake at once). |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
6 |
12,798 |
08-24-2014, 11:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 280X speed
Post: RE: R9 280X speed
|
atom Wrote: (08-29-2014, 11:36 AM)
--
ocl Wrote: (08-24-2014, 11:47 AM)
--
I'm getting ~125 kH/s running Ubuntu 14.04 64bit (one handshake at once).
--
that perfectly matches expectations
--
Goo... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
6 |
12,798 |
09-02-2014, 05:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 285
Post: RE: R9 285
| Weird: I read the R9 280 has 250watt TDP but wiki shows 200watt TDP (for the num of stream processors 200 make indeed more sense). So it's not a 60watt difference but only 10. I'm a bit disappointed b... |
|
ocl |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,171 |
09-03-2014, 08:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| The only reason why the hashcat team doesn't open source hashcat is because they don't want people to have the source. Probably because they want to keep the "fame" for themselves. Nothing else makes ... |
|
ocl |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,481 |
10-12-2013, 02:33 PM |
