|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: Multi Rules Problem
| Hi atom
:(
Sorry to have to report that the multi rules doesn’t work for me. This could obviously be entirely my fault however. :D
To reproduce
oclHashcat-plus-0.07b3
WPA.hcap p... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-18-2011, 09:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
| Hmm.. cough. :(
Due to my experiences of ever questioning or doubting your code, I have learnt to display copious amounts of a$$ covering before posting.
Here
Quote:
--
This could obviously b... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-19-2011, 06:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
|
nobody Wrote: (12-19-2011, 07:09 PM)
--
How can we get the 0.07b3?
--
You can't "get it" you are given it :)
I think atom took pity on me as I manged to receive a copy by being an enthusiastic i... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-19-2011, 07:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
| atom,
Just so this thread hasn't wasted your time completely, would it be possible to change the --help file of oclHashcat-plus with regards to the rule files ?
Where it says ...
Quote:
--
-... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-19-2011, 10:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
|
shapleigh Wrote: (12-20-2011, 02:56 AM)
--
you were using -r 1.rule 2.rule and it was generating PASSWOR$D, as result of treading 2.rule as a word file?
--
Yes, thats right ! :D
OK You get 10 ha... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-20-2011, 06:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
|
atom Wrote: (12-21-2011, 02:37 PM)
--
much better, changed that :)
--
:)
Thanks !
I hope this saves you some time when you make the final release ! I guess this is the idea of beta's.
No ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-22-2011, 05:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem...I Think
Post: Multi Rules Problem...I Think
| Hi
Before I go any further I must perform the usual a$$ covering that this could all very well be my own fault :D I have been wrong many times before !
I think I have found something interestin... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,179 |
12-29-2011, 11:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem...I Think
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem...I Think
| Ha ha !! :D Good grief !!! I never thought I would get something right !!
Thank you atom for fixing it so fast ! |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,179 |
12-30-2011, 06:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Add rule name to status
Post: RE: Add rule name to status
| Can I also add a request related to this ?
Add BSSID to status alongside ESSID ? This will help separate multiple WPA keys all called "Netgear" for example.
If you can indicate yes or no to the... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
13,536 |
12-30-2011, 07:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Pending To Accepted
Post: Pending To Accepted
| atom,
Would you please let me know how people can change requests "pending" into ones that you accept ?
I am selfishly referring to my request to add some sort of Markov feature in maskprocessor... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
8,553 |
12-30-2011, 07:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
| Hey atom !
You are awesome, hashcatplus is awesome....everything is awesome !! :D
Thank you very much for all your hard work and I really do hope you have a great new year ! |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
8 |
29,866 |
12-31-2011, 04:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Pending To Accepted
Post: RE: Pending To Accepted
|
atom Wrote: (12-31-2011, 01:54 AM)
--
no, just busy with other features
--
Ok Thats great ! :)
I think I got confused with what the terms meant as I had originally set them up as follows.
Acc... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
8,553 |
12-31-2011, 07:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Torrent
Post: Torrent
| I was wondering if it would help you out atom if you made a torrent of new releases ?
This way users could help by sharing the bandwidth. As long as the release has a checksum on your site or bett... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
8,279 |
12-31-2011, 07:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 6990 today or wait for 7970?
Post: RE: 6990 today or wait for 7970?
|
ati6990 Wrote: (12-31-2011, 07:53 PM)
--
or you ask mama for more money
--
Really, there is no need for that. forumhero was asking a genuine question and has not been offensive to you at all.
C... |
|
Hash-IT |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,277 |
12-31-2011, 08:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Brute Force Attack
Post: New Brute Force Attack
| I am having trouble getting the new brute force attack working in oclhashcatplus.
I tried various options but assumed this should work.
Code:
--
oclHashcat-plus32.exe --hash-type 2500 -n 160 --... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
4 |
14,124 |
12-31-2011, 09:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Brute Force Attack
Post: RE: New Brute Force Attack
| Wow ...very fast reply !!!
Thank you for your help.
I got confused as I followed this (https://hashcat.net/wiki/brute_force_attack) link
Posted here (https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-761-post-... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
4 |
14,124 |
12-31-2011, 09:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Brute Force Attack
Post: RE: New Brute Force Attack
|
Quote:
--
oclHashcat-plus32.exe -a 3 --hash-type 2500 -n 160 -1 abcdefg12345 test.hccap -o Found.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
--
Works great ! Thank you !! :D
|
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
4 |
14,124 |
12-31-2011, 11:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Torrent
Post: RE: Torrent
| OK I understand, I was just trying to help alleviate the load on your account ! :) |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
8,279 |
12-31-2011, 11:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Add rule name to status
Post: RE: Add rule name to status
| This is great ! Thank you, I will add them now ! |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
13,536 |
12-31-2011, 11:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
Post: RE: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
|
Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: (01-01-2012, 01:47 AM)
--
With the new hashcat v0.38, or at least the hashcat-cli64.exe I'm running, rules with $4 or $9 drop the appending of the "4" or "9". Appending all the oth... |
|
Hash-IT |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
20,667 |
01-02-2012, 03:08 PM |
