Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.01
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.01
|
Hash-IT |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
11 |
36,317 |
01-01-2014, 06:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-utils v1.00
Post: RE: hashcat-utils v1.00
|
Hash-IT |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
11 |
24,569 |
03-25-2014, 01:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-utils v1.00
Post: RE: hashcat-utils v1.00
I don't think my comment deserves a new thread or even a trac ticket as I may have misunderstood something, but I thought I should at least mention it.
When using cleanup-rules.exe on Win7 64bit I ... |
|
Hash-IT |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
11 |
24,569 |
03-26-2014, 12:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-utils v1.00
Post: RE: hashcat-utils v1.00
atom Wrote: (03-26-2014, 07:17 PM)
--
Wait, cleanup-rules does not require a filename, it reads from stdin
--
@atom
OK I understand. :)
I am using it to clean exsisting rule lists I have, bei... |
|
Hash-IT |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
11 |
24,569 |
03-26-2014, 08:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat-utils v1.00
Post: RE: hashcat-utils v1.00
Thank you very much epixoip.
You explained that so well even someone like me understood it LOL :D
The pipe does indeed make more logical sense and helped me understand better.
I appreciate it... |
|
Hash-IT |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
11 |
24,569 |
03-27-2014, 03:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Effective rules
Post: RE: Effective rules
Thank you very much TonyS and very kind of you to share your work :) |
|
Hash-IT |
User Contributions
|
11 |
30,445 |
04-14-2015, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: Multi Rules Problem
Hi atom
:(
Sorry to have to report that the multi rules doesn’t work for me. This could obviously be entirely my fault however. :D
To reproduce
oclHashcat-plus-0.07b3
WPA.hcap p... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-18-2011, 09:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
Hmm.. cough. :(
Due to my experiences of ever questioning or doubting your code, I have learnt to display copious amounts of a$$ covering before posting.
Here
Quote:
--
This could obviously b... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-19-2011, 06:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
nobody Wrote: (12-19-2011, 07:09 PM)
--
How can we get the 0.07b3?
--
You can't "get it" you are given it :)
I think atom took pity on me as I manged to receive a copy by being an enthusiastic i... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-19-2011, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
atom,
Just so this thread hasn't wasted your time completely, would it be possible to change the --help file of oclHashcat-plus with regards to the rule files ?
Where it says ...
Quote:
--
-... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-19-2011, 10:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
shapleigh Wrote: (12-20-2011, 02:56 AM)
--
you were using -r 1.rule 2.rule and it was generating PASSWOR$D, as result of treading 2.rule as a word file?
--
Yes, thats right ! :D
OK You get 10 ha... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-20-2011, 06:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: Multi Rules Problem
Post: RE: Multi Rules Problem
atom Wrote: (12-21-2011, 02:37 PM)
--
much better, changed that :)
--
:)
Thanks !
I hope this saves you some time when you make the final release ! I guess this is the idea of beta's.
No ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,339 |
12-22-2011, 05:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: Standardization
Post: RE: Standardization
Done :)
I was wondering if you would please let us know about the "pending" requests ? I am not sure if you need to test things or you are just considering them.
I don't want to influence you i... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
20,930 |
01-30-2012, 06:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Standardization
Post: RE: Standardization
atom Wrote: (01-31-2012, 11:31 AM)
--
No progress on this stuff yet. Currently working on new EULA.
--
OK, thank you for letting us know. :) |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
20,930 |
01-31-2012, 01:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: how to Bruteforce wpa/wpa2 in GUI mode
Post: RE: how to Bruteforce wpa/wpa2 in GUI mode
I requested a feature some months ago that would help speed brute forcing 8 character WPA passwords. A type of Markov filter for maskprocessor would be very useful. However now that oclHashcat-plus ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
40,078 |
02-25-2012, 05:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: Standardization
Post: RE: Standardization
Hi atom
Quote:
--
this is not like a work queue
--
I understand this and I am very grateful for your efforts, I hope you have not misunderstood the mood or tone of my post.
Quote:
--
if i am... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
20,930 |
03-09-2012, 07:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Standardization
Post: RE: Standardization
Hi atom :)
You mentioned here (https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-975-post-4968.html#pid4968)“i am still watching the demandâ€.
I intended for the feature request page (https://hashcat.n... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
20,930 |
03-09-2012, 06:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat unexpected output from "s" Rule
Post: hashcat unexpected output from "s" Rule
Using latest beta of hascat 0.40b4
Code:
--
hashcat-cli32.exe -r "test.rule" --stdout dic.txt >> Out.txt
--
dic.txt contains ABCDEFGH
test.rule conatains
Code:
--
sABsBCsCDsDEsEFsFGsGHsHIsIJsJKsK... |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
9,790 |
06-05-2012, 12:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat unexpected output from "s" Rule
Post: RE: hashcat unexpected output from "s" Rule
atom Wrote: (06-05-2012, 12:40 PM)
--
Simply to many functions :)
--
Ahh... any idea what the limit is ? :)
This has just broken an idea I had for the "Limiting the consecutive occurrence" threa... |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
9,790 |
06-05-2012, 12:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat unexpected output from "s" Rule
Post: RE: hashcat unexpected output from "s" Rule
@ntk and @M@LIK
It seems to be that hashcat doesn't read the rule properly if it is on the first line. See my post above.
It does seem to work if there is more than one rule in the list and it ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
9,790 |
06-05-2012, 01:08 PM |