|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
|
ntk Wrote: (06-03-2012, 12:56 AM)
--
over 70GB then there is something missed out Hash-IT. Try the regex fillter on smaller charset. You will see how much it can save. Roughly 25-30% file size
--
Th... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-03-2012, 11:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
|
M@LIK Wrote: (06-03-2012, 02:58 PM)
--
Sorry for being negative, but wait, I smell something wrong here!
Let me just think about it.
--
No problem M@LIK, sniff away !! :D
I was worried this may be ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-03-2012, 03:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
|
ntk Wrote: (06-03-2012, 01:07 PM)
--
you are very correct Hash-IT. It is the pattern of the sequence what you are interested in. Not the content.
crunch 8 8 abcdef | "filter" would give similar resu... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-03-2012, 01:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
| Here you go, this should be the rule that sorts it all out and saves us all that disk space !!!
Code:
--
######
sAB
sBC
sCD
sDE
sEF
sFG
sGH
sHI
sIJ
sJK
sKL
sLM
sMN
sNO
sOP
sPQ
sQR
sRS
sST
sTU
sUV
s... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-03-2012, 02:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
|
Pixel Wrote: (06-04-2012, 12:12 PM)
--
Well done Hash-IT, I like this idea. Would it still work after filtering with sed?
Look like I'll be getting that new GPU after all....
--
Thanks !! It j... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-04-2012, 01:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
|
ntk Wrote: (06-05-2012, 02:08 AM)
--
could some one pls explain to me when you use rule does it run CPU or GPU to modify the dict? also when it breaks up with a rule and go to the next? When the rule... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-05-2012, 02:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
| You're welcome.
Have you had any results testing the pattern + rule theory out ? I am worried about it since M@LIK mentioned it my not be that simple. However I haven't thought of a problem with i... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-05-2012, 03:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
| Sorry I wasn't clear enough when I posted the rule list to make this work. I just generated them and in my haste pasted them in a column instead f in a line. Here are the rules as they should be.
T... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-05-2012, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
|
Pixel Wrote: (06-07-2012, 12:27 PM)
--
This idea seems to work well Hash-IT but we need to find faster way to filter it and figure how hard to filter it.
--
I'm glad you are still interested in this... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,820 |
06-07-2012, 02:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
| The hashcat forum has always been an enjoyable, interesting and educational sanctuary to retreat to for me. Many other hash cracking, security and pen testing sites on the internet are littered with ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,552 |
01-05-2013, 04:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
|
.::Rizwan::. Wrote: (01-06-2013, 10:20 PM)
--
@Hash-IT
Very well said indeed.
--
Thanks. :)
Sorry I didn't reply earlier, didn't notice your post. |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,552 |
01-09-2013, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
|
ati6990 Wrote: (01-09-2013, 02:21 PM)
--
Soo you ask why are so many ppl angry about sl3 bit**es ?
cauz they act all the same
never again ask for sl3 support dudes....
--
Congratulations on firi... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,552 |
01-09-2013, 04:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
| Another vote for WPA support !
Atom, please consider this feature request, it would be great to support WPA in Hashcat.
|
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
04-07-2011, 11:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
| Thank you, thank you and thank you atom !! :o)
Many people will be grateful for this feature and you have also saved us all from EWSA !!!
I am so pleased you managed to work WPA out and add it t... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-26-2011, 10:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
|
atom Wrote: (08-31-2011, 12:54 PM)
--
yeah but i am to lazy to code .cap parser
--
Hi atom
I can completely understand your lack of enthusiasm to make a .cap parser for hashcatplus.
I think I... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-31-2011, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
|
atom Wrote: (09-01-2011, 09:22 AM)
--
hello hash-it,
thanks for these words. well i thought again about it. but i am still sure its better not to touch .cap parsing code. coding a simple .cap pars... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
09-01-2011, 11:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
|
atom Wrote: (09-02-2011, 05:39 PM)
--
check out this: https://hashcat.net/cap2hccap
what you think?
--
What do I think ???? Well.....
My dog looks like this....
https://www.lolbrary.com/lo... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
09-02-2011, 06:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
| This challenge is a great idea, thank you james123 ! :D
I do wonder though if it might be better if a different source password list was used, as in one without existing modifiers ?
As I am sure... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,608 |
03-27-2012, 04:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
| Thank you for your reply.
I apologise, I assumed you were trying to find the best 64 rule list.
I believe you may have misunderstood the tone of my post, you have quoted a small part of a senten... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,608 |
03-27-2012, 08:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
| Congratulations arex1337, well done.
I enjoyed reading your write up and thank you for putting so much work into making hashcat's rules even better.
It was also nice to see that you not only sha... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,608 |
03-29-2012, 01:13 AM |
