Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
Hey atom !
You are awesome, hashcatplus is awesome....everything is awesome !! :D
Thank you very much for all your hard work and I really do hope you have a great new year ! |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
8 |
29,866 |
12-31-2011, 04:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcatplus doesn't work with wpa
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09
Atlantis Wrote: (10-23-2012, 02:20 PM)
--
Atom! Hashcatplus, even the last 0.09 version, doesn't work with wpa. It skips passwords. Where can I send you a hccap, a cap and the dictionary (small) for ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
20,127 |
10-23-2012, 04:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
Thank you for writing your thoughts on the poll results atom.
I wonder if the >16 character password performance drops would be less noticeable on WPA for example ? People are more likely to use p... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
38,160 |
05-22-2012, 08:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
skalderis Wrote: (05-22-2012, 08:35 PM)
--
I personally think > 16 passwords support is useless. If somebody security minded chose password more than 16 in length, many chances that you can hit this?... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
38,160 |
05-22-2012, 10:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
Ha ha :D
I am starting to wonder if the drop in performance would be so bad for WPA cracking as it would for MD5 for example. I suspect the drop will be different for each.
I think it has been ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
38,160 |
05-23-2012, 12:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
forumhero Wrote: (05-24-2012, 08:23 AM)
--
- skip those that don't. plenty of neighbors to exploit
- true but 8/10 it is enabled and is enabled by default
- get high gain antenna
don't mean to g... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
38,160 |
05-24-2012, 01:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 poll
forumhero Wrote: (05-24-2012, 03:54 PM)
--
perhaps i'm shortsighted and not seeing the big picture but i don't see a need for >15 char if you're just learning.
--
People will learn that there are m... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
38,160 |
05-24-2012, 04:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 1/3: Next major feature
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 1/3: Next major fea...
Password Length !!! :)
Markov Attack a very close second. |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
23 |
55,345 |
05-09-2012, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithms
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithm...
Nice to see you are continuing to relentlessly expand hashcats abilities atom !
I voted for TrueCrypt and PasswordsSafe out of the selection above. I was surprised to see you considering TrueCrypt... |
|
Hash-IT |
Organisation and Events
|
15 |
35,523 |
05-09-2012, 03:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
Thank you very much for all your hard work this year atom, it is very much appreciated.
Happy new year !! :D |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
12-31-2012, 07:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
Kuci Wrote: (01-13-2013, 12:53 PM)
--
You can't know whether I need it or not. I'm programmer, I need it for my projects...
--
It appeared to me that KT819GM meant you don't need APP SDK to run has... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
01-13-2013, 04:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.14
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
35 |
89,008 |
02-01-2013, 01:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.14
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
Upgraded to oclhashcat-plus 0.13 and Catalyst 13.1 today.
Using what I believe to be my original settings I have a speed increase of 1k/s on -m 2500
I thought the new AMD driver was supposed to ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
35 |
89,008 |
02-01-2013, 09:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.14
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
undeath Wrote: (02-02-2013, 10:37 PM)
--
who needs -a3? there's a dict for that!
--
:D :D :D
That's very good ! :) |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
35 |
89,008 |
02-02-2013, 10:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.14
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.13 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
hash_it Wrote: (09-10-2013, 07:52 PM)
--
Hi Atom,
I was looking to download HC+ v0.13 but there is a link only to v0.15 & 0.14. The problem is a have a good old HD4650M and I get a clBuild error (11... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
35 |
89,008 |
10-04-2013, 06:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
31 |
215,942 |
08-26-2013, 07:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16 100% Fan at 70c
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16 100% Fan at 70c
atom Wrote: (06-05-2012, 12:43 PM)
--
New Feature: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1237-post-6746.html#pid6746
--
:D thought so, thank you for the reply.
Is 70c high ? I would have thought that ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,825 |
06-05-2012, 12:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16 100% Fan at 70c
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16 100% Fan at 70c
atom Wrote: (06-05-2012, 06:09 PM)
--
OK, I will increase to 80c
--
Thank you for thinking about it for me but I don't really know what would be the best temperature.
If you think 80c would be o... |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,825 |
06-05-2012, 06:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.09b17.7z Fan
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.09b17.7z Fan
OK sorry, I was a little to keen there wasn't I ? :D
You might want to delete this thread for neatness. |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,363 |
06-12-2012, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack
Post: RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid a...
atom Wrote: (06-11-2012, 09:36 AM)
--
This is very hard to implement. More demand?
--
Well, I would never "demand" anything :)
However I think M@LIK has had a good idea there. |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
20,670 |
06-13-2012, 10:57 PM |