|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Public Hash Cracker programming help
Post: RE: Public Hash Cracker programming help
| Well done for getting this far fizikalac.
I am really looking forward to this, I can't wait to get it going. I have been storing up my founds for a good few days now !! :)
I know a few others who w... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Talk
|
4 |
12,288 |
06-13-2012, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problems with prefix rule.
Post: RE: Problems with prefix rule.
| Hi undeath and thank you for taking the time to reply, you have saved me a lot of frustration.
I had no idea that the prefix rule worked in reverse !! I have just tested now using your method and ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,780 |
05-17-2012, 12:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problems with prefix rule.
Post: RE: Problems with prefix rule.
| Thanks for your input M@LIK.
I was just starting to work it out but the diagram you made (quoted below) really helped me visualize it, so much clearer now and in fact I am rather embarrassed I didn... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,780 |
05-17-2012, 01:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with md5 brute force
Post: RE: Problem with md5 brute force
| From here. (https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=oclhashcat_plus)
Code:
--
* Generic hash types:
0 = MD5
10 = md5($pass.$salt)
20 = md5($salt.$pass)
30 = md5(unicode($pass).$s... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
11 |
36,689 |
03-08-2013, 11:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with md5 brute force
Post: RE: Problem with md5 brute force
|
tori Wrote: (03-08-2013, 11:18 PM)
--
I don't know how to put the other parameters together.
--
What exactly do you want it to do ?
Are you using CUDA or OCL ? |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
11 |
36,689 |
03-08-2013, 11:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with md5 brute force
Post: RE: Problem with md5 brute force
|
tori Wrote: (03-08-2013, 11:44 PM)
--
I want to use ocl
--
OK well that's a start, can you be more specific please ?
32 or 64 bit ? Then please explain exactly what you want to do. |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
11 |
36,689 |
03-08-2013, 11:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with md5 brute force
Post: RE: Problem with md5 brute force
|
tori Wrote: (03-08-2013, 11:56 PM)
--
32 bit I want just brute force a md5. But i don't know what to key in.
--
:)
Oh dear, its going to be a long night isn't it ? You are making me work for th... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
11 |
36,689 |
03-09-2013, 12:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with md5 brute force
Post: RE: Problem with md5 brute force
|
tori Wrote: (03-09-2013, 12:15 AM)
--
yes I'm using windows 7
numbers and letters uppercase lowercase
7 characters
a single hash
--
OK try this.
I have used oclhashcat-plus in this example be... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
11 |
36,689 |
03-09-2013, 12:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with md5 brute force
Post: RE: Problem with md5 brute force
|
tori Wrote: (03-09-2013, 12:50 AM)
--
thx you made my day
--
Yay ! :D
When you want to crack a text file of MD5's and not just a single hash do this...
oclHashcat-plus32.exe -a 3 -m 0 -1 ?u?... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
11 |
36,689 |
03-09-2013, 12:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with conversion from .cap to .hccap
Post: RE: Problem with conversion from .cap to .hccap
| I really don't want to go against anything said here, but in my personal experience I have had nothing but trouble when using WPAClean.
In fact I found it corrupted .caps so badly and so often I as... |
|
Hash-IT |
General Help
|
5 |
17,691 |
04-11-2013, 02:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PrinceProcessor now open source
Post: RE: PrinceProcessor now open source
| That's very kind of you atom, thank you :) |
|
Hash-IT |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
12 |
20,294 |
01-08-2015, 05:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Practical PRINCE: 1 CPU + 24 hours = 63% Linkedin hashes cracked, 100% automated
Post: RE: Practical PRINCE: 1 CPU + 24 hours = 63% Linke...
| Thank you for all your hard work and for sharing :) |
|
Hash-IT |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
22 |
74,889 |
12-22-2014, 05:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible hardware
Post: RE: Possible hardware
| This looks too much like an advert to me. :(
Would you please remove the link stronthoop as advertising is not allowed on the forum. |
|
Hash-IT |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,798 |
03-23-2013, 03:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible Bug With oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16
Post: RE: Possible Bug With oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16
|
atom Wrote: (06-05-2012, 09:54 AM)
--
This is the finished implementation of the poll #2 (increment brute force).
If you want it to start like in 0.07 add --bf-min 10.
--
Ah ok, thanks.
Sorry for... |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,437 |
06-05-2012, 10:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible Bug When Defining Known Character
Post: RE: Possible Bug When Defining Known Character
| Hi
Thank you all for your interest in this.
I had started to think you had forgotten me !
The problem has developed somewhat, which may not be bad news after all as I think I can now provide ... |
|
Hash-IT |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,449 |
04-11-2011, 12:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
|
atom Wrote: (10-26-2010, 09:48 AM)
--
hc and oclhc are made for competition and these competitions usually base on md4, md5 or sha1. thats why i will not add aes or zip or rar.
--
Now we have hashc... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
11-15-2011, 02:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
| OK, I understand. I had to ask as I believe it would be very popular.
Please bear them in mind though and if you ever get bored or just feel like it please consider them again.
:)
Thank you. |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
11-15-2011, 05:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
| I have added the request here (https://hashcat.net/wiki/feature_requests).
We'll just have to see if he accepts it. :) |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
02-08-2012, 01:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Performace Loss Numbers
Post: RE: Performace Loss Numbers
| I am sooooo happy, thank you very much atom >16 support has been on my wish list for a very long time. You have done an amazing job to retain functionality and speed.
Thank you. |
|
Hash-IT |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
13,024 |
06-27-2013, 09:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: per dictionary rules, more dictionaries
Post: RE: per dictionary rules, more dictionaries
|
pragmatic Wrote: (09-17-2012, 07:09 PM)
--
Yeah, I knew it wouldn't be easy, but man would it be sweet. I will understand if its deemed unreasonable, just thought I'd throw out my ideal state and see... |
|
Hash-IT |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,368 |
09-17-2012, 08:13 PM |
