|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.36
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36
|
epixoip Wrote: (04-26-2015, 06:03 AM)
--
Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: (04-25-2015, 11:28 PM)
--
Is there some problem with the NVIDIA kernel or some other problem?
--
Nah, default workload is just too large.... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
12 |
45,554 |
04-26-2015, 04:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.36
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36
| Since it is only the benchmark aspect I'm interested in, is there some value that everyone should use, for comparison purposes? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
12 |
45,554 |
04-28-2015, 01:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinations
Post: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinations
| Hashcat's Combination mode attack seems to not generate all the combinations.
With the goal of using hashcat's words Combination attack-mode=1, my first step is to convert more of the KoreLogic joh... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
14,782 |
03-27-2011, 07:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinations
Post: RE: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinat...
| Trying words, rather than symbols, got these results:
50*50 = 2,500 expected vs 2,499 output; 1 short
60*60 = 3,600 expected vs 3,600 output; OK
70*70 = 4,900 expected vs 4,894 output; 6 short
8... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
14,782 |
03-29-2011, 01:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinations
Post: RE: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinat...
|
atom Wrote: (03-29-2011, 10:41 AM)
--
i can just guess now, but maybe it related to multiple threads writing to the same output file. can you try to reproduce this with -n 1? if the bug is gone, it s... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
14,782 |
03-29-2011, 10:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinations
Post: RE: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinat...
| After finding that using just one thread solved the problem, I erased the test files.
Making a new quick test file of 70 items, all the same length, and running four times in a row (with the defaul... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
14,782 |
04-02-2011, 02:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinations
Post: RE: Combination mode doesn't generate all combinat...
| Hashcat in straight words attack-mode=0 has the same problem.
I ran the simple prepend rule on the 1,185,921 4 specials text body to get the capitalized version of the rules, with the default 8 thr... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
14,782 |
04-03-2011, 06:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat password length limit?
Post: hashcat password length limit?
| Does hashcat have a 15 character password rule limit?
A rule like "i7! $2 $3" on a 12 character word works, but fails on a 13 character word.
I'm using that "--stdout" option on a "nofind" type ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
11,635 |
12-10-2011, 03:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat password length limit?
Post: RE: hashcat password length limit?
| Putting that rule into rule.rule, and your word into word.txt, then running (hashcat 0.37 on a Win7 64-bit system):
> hashcat-cli64.exe --stdout -r rule.rule word.txt
outputs just a blank line.
... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
11,635 |
12-12-2011, 11:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is the 'p' rule working in 0.38?
Post: Is the 'p' rule working in 0.38?
| The rules.txt file for hashcat has:
#define RULE_OP_MANGLE_DUPEWORD_TIMES 'p' // append word to itself N times
But in hashcat-cli64.exe v 0.38, it doesn't seem to work.
(I haven't found it to work in... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
0 |
4,359 |
12-25-2011, 11:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
Post: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
| With the new hashcat v0.38, or at least the hashcat-cli64.exe I'm running, rules with $4 or $9 drop the appending of the "4" or "9". Appending all the other digits work. But rules that should append ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
20,667 |
01-01-2012, 01:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
Post: RE: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
| Change the rule to
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
I get
word0
word1
word2
word3
word5
word6
word7
word8
in v0.38, Windows 64-bit version.
Changing the rule.txt file to
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$0... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
20,667 |
01-01-2012, 02:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
Post: RE: rules with $4 or $9 and ^4 or ^9 dropped
|
atom Wrote: (01-02-2012, 11:20 AM)
--
which cpu are you working on?
--
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU 550 @ 3.20GHz
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1 |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
20,667 |
01-02-2012, 01:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.38 skipping words
Post: RE: hashcat 0.38 skipping words
| But when can ordinary users get the fixed version? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,305 |
03-20-2012, 01:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| At the risk of having the moderators get after me for cross-posting, I'm asking here about a possible bug I mentioned in another thread.
Running hashcat-cli64.exe v0.41 using the Cain word list on ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 10:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| What I'm trying to do is find out how much longer a specific rule makes a particular combinator attack.
I was trying a "do nothing" rule as a start. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 01:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| I'm still trying to understand why for the same attack, hashcat does give an ETC for:
Progress..: 121/306706 (0.04%)
Yet adding -r (for a rule that just does ":" so is functionally the same as no ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-24-2012, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
|
atom Wrote: (10-25-2012, 09:13 AM)
--
You need at least (100 * nr-of-rules)/306706 in the progress to get an initial display.
--
(100 * 1)/306706 = 0.03%, yet in the example where I've reached 0.0... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-25-2012, 09:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
|
M@LIK Wrote: (10-22-2012, 10:58 PM)
--
I suppose you are on Windows. Try with -r nul since you aren't using any actual rules.
--
Added rules from file nul: 0
Input.Mode: Dict (..\dicts\CainWordl... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 11:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| How does this apply to exactly the same operation being done, the first with only -a 1 running for less than a minute, getting to 0.04% and displaying an ETC, while with -r it goes for even 10 minutes... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 08:58 PM |
