|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Post: RE: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
| Running some tests tonight, I found that the problem was actually due to using the new option: --debug-mode=3. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
22,818 |
08-03-2013, 03:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Post: RE: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
| No, I haven't set myself up there, as I'm never quite sure if what I find is really a hashcat problem or something to do with my test environment.
I'd prefer to post a problem here, and let someone... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
22,818 |
08-04-2013, 05:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Post: RE: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
| hashcat-cli64.exe -n 4 -c 128 --remove --debug-file=..\output\debug.txt --debug-mode=3 -a 0 -m 1100
-r KoreLogicRulesAppend4Num.rule -o ..\output\found.txt ..\hashes\A0.M1100.hash ..\dicts\CainWordli... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
22,818 |
08-04-2013, 08:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
| The readme.txt says:
oclHashcat-plus v0.15
=====================
NV users require ForceWare 319.37 or later
As I reported last month, I had trouble determining whether the problems I was havin... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
08-25-2013, 03:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
| The default tunings seem different, as in higher, so I'm staying with my lower settings that reduce screen drag, for a while, until I see some discussion about the new tuning situation. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
08-25-2013, 04:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
| Some reading about the CUDA Toolkit led me to think that there was a separate developer driver that could be independent of the main graphics drivers, but choosing just the graphics drivers from the C... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
08-26-2013, 02:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
|
Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: (08-25-2013, 03:03 AM)
--
The readme.txt says:
oclHashcat-plus v0.15
=====================
NV users require ForceWare 319.37 or later
As I reported last month, I had trouble deter... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
08-25-2013, 08:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| The developer graphics driver 320.57 from the CUDA Toolkit 5.5 froze my system, too.
So I'm back to 314.22 again until I can find some way to get the CUDA level needed by v0.15.
If I could simply fi... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
08-27-2013, 10:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| atom and co-developers,
Since the NVIDIA driver issue is still dragging on, meaning that I still can't yet use a Geforce driver having the needed CUDA 5.5 that is stable, is there a simple way to c... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
10-10-2013, 12:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| The GeForce forums are full of reports of how the drivers from 320 onward do not yet work with Fermi/400/500 cards. This has gone on for over half a year. So I am stuck on the 314.22 driver than is on... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
10-10-2013, 10:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| NVIDIA is asking us to send in for testing cards that won't work with drivers past 314.22.
They will pay for shipping both ways:
Desktop/Internet Browser Freeze or TDR Thread w/ Geforce 460/560 GPUs... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
10-16-2013, 11:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.36
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36
|
epixoip Wrote: (04-26-2015, 06:03 AM)
--
Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: (04-25-2015, 11:28 PM)
--
Is there some problem with the NVIDIA kernel or some other problem?
--
Nah, default workload is just too large.... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
12 |
45,554 |
04-26-2015, 04:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.36
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36
| Since it is only the benchmark aspect I'm interested in, is there some value that everyone should use, for comparison purposes? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
12 |
45,554 |
04-28-2015, 01:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.36
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36
| Running the subsets of the benchmarks I use to avoid cudaHashcat crashing in Windows, I get a funny result for hash-type=10700.
The tail end of c1.35 gets:
>cudaHashcat64.exe --benchmark --hash-... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
12 |
45,554 |
04-25-2015, 11:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Wordlist of phrases
Post: RE: Wordlist of phrases
| See the PhraserGram and Phraser tools at:
https://github.com/Sparell/Phraser
And:
Linguistic Cracking of Passphrases using Markov Chains
PasswordsCon 2015 Cambridge
Peder Sparell |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
User Contributions
|
12 |
15,146 |
12-28-2016, 04:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| At the risk of having the moderators get after me for cross-posting, I'm asking here about a possible bug I mentioned in another thread.
Running hashcat-cli64.exe v0.41 using the Cain word list on ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 10:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
|
M@LIK Wrote: (10-22-2012, 10:58 PM)
--
I suppose you are on Windows. Try with -r nul since you aren't using any actual rules.
--
Added rules from file nul: 0
Input.Mode: Dict (..\dicts\CainWordl... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 11:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| What I'm trying to do is find out how much longer a specific rule makes a particular combinator attack.
I was trying a "do nothing" rule as a start. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 01:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| I'm still trying to understand why for the same attack, hashcat does give an ETC for:
Progress..: 121/306706 (0.04%)
Yet adding -r (for a rule that just does ":" so is functionally the same as no ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-24-2012, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
|
atom Wrote: (10-25-2012, 09:13 AM)
--
You need at least (100 * nr-of-rules)/306706 in the progress to get an initial display.
--
(100 * 1)/306706 = 0.03%, yet in the example where I've reached 0.0... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-25-2012, 09:32 PM |
