Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Congrats for CMIYC 2012
Post: RE: Congrats for CMIYC 2012
Korelogic's press FAQ page said that the password cracking rules for the 2012 contest "will be published after August 1, 2012."
So far, I haven't seen them yet. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
28,411 |
08-07-2012, 10:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
At the risk of having the moderators get after me for cross-posting, I'm asking here about a possible bug I mentioned in another thread.
Running hashcat-cli64.exe v0.41 using the Cain word list on ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 10:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
M@LIK Wrote: (10-22-2012, 10:58 PM)
--
I suppose you are on Windows. Try with -r nul since you aren't using any actual rules.
--
Added rules from file nul: 0
Input.Mode: Dict (..\dicts\CainWordl... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 11:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
What I'm trying to do is find out how much longer a specific rule makes a particular combinator attack.
I was trying a "do nothing" rule as a start. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 01:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
I'm still trying to understand why for the same attack, hashcat does give an ETC for:
Progress..: 121/306706 (0.04%)
Yet adding -r (for a rule that just does ":" so is functionally the same as no ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-24-2012, 11:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
atom Wrote: (10-25-2012, 09:13 AM)
--
You need at least (100 * nr-of-rules)/306706 in the progress to get an initial display.
--
(100 * 1)/306706 = 0.03%, yet in the example where I've reached 0.0... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-25-2012, 09:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
How does this apply to exactly the same operation being done, the first with only -a 1 running for less than a minute, getting to 0.04% and displaying an ETC, while with -r it goes for even 10 minutes... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 08:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: splitlen shrinks dictionary size?
Post: RE: splitlen shrinks dictionary size?
Splitlen stops at 15 characters.
Try ULM. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
13 |
29,307 |
09-10-2013, 09:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: splitlen shrinks dictionary size?
Post: RE: splitlen shrinks dictionary size?
Now with oclHashcat going beyond the 15 up to 55 characters, can splitlen be recompiled as part of the official distribution? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
13 |
29,307 |
12-07-2013, 04:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: Analyse passwords list
Post: RE: Analyse passwords list
ULM has some analyses (https://unifiedlm.com).
There is another analyzer out there called "Pipal".
There are also tools linguists use. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
13 |
21,123 |
08-18-2014, 09:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: Analyse passwords list
Post: RE: Analyse passwords list
Meanwhile, have you seen the series "Quantifying and Ranking Wordlist Effectiveness Part 1: Methodology" at
https://benjaminellett.com/quantifying-and-ranking-wordlist-effectiveness-part-1-methodology... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
13 |
21,123 |
08-21-2014, 09:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: New Tool: kwprocessor
Post: RE: New Tool: kwprocessor
For those of us that don't compile, can you release a few executables? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
User Contributions
|
13 |
19,597 |
08-15-2016, 09:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
In the Press section of the Wiki, the article from ARS Technica has Rick Redman (of KoreLogic) combining the two items "sup3r" and "thinkers" from RockYou to get "Sup3rThinkers".
This must be the C... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-21-2012, 09:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Did "sup3r" become "Sup3r" and "thinkers" become "Thinkers" before being combined, or did "sup3r" + "thinkers" = "sup3rthinkers" with some sort of case toggling applied to the the "s" and "t"?
A quic... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-21-2012, 10:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
I somehow thought there couldn't be two dictionaries used at once by 'plus.
So the -j u would apply to dict1 and the -k u to dict2?
(This is like the original oclHashcat, which was backported into '... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-21-2012, 11:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Can someone update the Wiki for the Combinator attack to point out this difference? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-22-2012, 12:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
A quick speed comparison using the word list from Cain against a group of 60 hashes, with no rules, showed that CPU hashcat would take 2 days, whlie the GPU hashcat-plus would take 26 days (for the -a... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-22-2012, 04:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Post: RE: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
There is a program that may have been causing some system troubles, which I've uninstalled.
If a week goes by without trouble, then I'll re-try the batch file running hashcat. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
22,818 |
07-21-2013, 09:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Post: RE: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
The guts are:
:: run the batch of rules
FOR /F %%G IN (rules-batch.txt) DO (call :main %%G)
The command line used starts off with:
hashcat-cli64.exe -n 4 -c 128 |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
22,818 |
07-26-2013, 12:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Post: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Today I was running hashcat 0.46 via a batch/command file with a list of 52 rules, and it seemed to be a culprit in crashing my 16 GB Windows 7 Home Premium system. I've run that same batch/command fi... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
22,818 |
07-21-2013, 05:20 AM |