|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
| Did "sup3r" become "Sup3r" and "thinkers" become "Thinkers" before being combined, or did "sup3r" + "thinkers" = "sup3rthinkers" with some sort of case toggling applied to the the "s" and "t"?
A quic... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-21-2012, 10:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
| I somehow thought there couldn't be two dictionaries used at once by 'plus.
So the -j u would apply to dict1 and the -k u to dict2?
(This is like the original oclHashcat, which was backported into '... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-21-2012, 11:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
| Can someone update the Wiki for the Combinator attack to point out this difference? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-22-2012, 12:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
Post: RE: How to apply rules to combinator attack?
| A quick speed comparison using the word list from Cain against a group of 60 hashes, with no rules, showed that CPU hashcat would take 2 days, whlie the GPU hashcat-plus would take 26 days (for the -a... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
12 |
22,997 |
10-22-2012, 04:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| At the risk of having the moderators get after me for cross-posting, I'm asking here about a possible bug I mentioned in another thread.
Running hashcat-cli64.exe v0.41 using the Cain word list on ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 10:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
|
M@LIK Wrote: (10-22-2012, 10:58 PM)
--
I suppose you are on Windows. Try with -r nul since you aren't using any actual rules.
--
Added rules from file nul: 0
Input.Mode: Dict (..\dicts\CainWordl... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 11:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| What I'm trying to do is find out how much longer a specific rule makes a particular combinator attack.
I was trying a "do nothing" rule as a start. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 01:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| How does this apply to exactly the same operation being done, the first with only -a 1 running for less than a minute, getting to 0.04% and displaying an ETC, while with -r it goes for even 10 minutes... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 08:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
| I'm still trying to understand why for the same attack, hashcat does give an ETC for:
Progress..: 121/306706 (0.04%)
Yet adding -r (for a rule that just does ":" so is functionally the same as no ... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-24-2012, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
|
atom Wrote: (10-25-2012, 09:13 AM)
--
You need at least (100 * nr-of-rules)/306706 in the progress to get an initial display.
--
(100 * 1)/306706 = 0.03%, yet in the example where I've reached 0.0... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-25-2012, 09:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Another Rick Redman/KoreLogic presentation
Post: Another Rick Redman/KoreLogic presentation
| There is another Rick Redman/KoreLogic presentation from the San Francisco ISACA Chapter Fall Conference that should be put in the Wiki:
G24 - What You Can Learn from Bad Guys and Hackers About Cra... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Talk
|
1 |
7,401 |
11-11-2012, 03:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41 putting something other than hash in .pot file
Post: hashcat 0.41 putting something other than hash in ...
| Hashcat 0.41 64-bit for Windows is putting a hex string in the hashcat.pot file that is not the hash.
Since I usually look at the output file, I hadn't noticed this before.
The hex string is jus... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,436 |
11-27-2012, 01:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Effect of Grammar on Security of Long Passwords
Post: RE: Effect of Grammar on Security of Long Password...
| In the abstract they write:
"We show that using a better dictionary e.g. Google Web Corpus, we can crack more long passwords than previously shown (20.5% vs. 6%)."
The discuss methods using corpus li... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
General Help
|
6 |
11,602 |
01-27-2013, 11:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove with just one hash?
Post: --remove with just one hash?
| Running hashcat-cli64.exe 0.44 with --remove against the last or just one hash seems to not remove it when the password is successfully found.
Shouldn't it remove the last hash, and leave a zero-by... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
5,513 |
05-19-2013, 07:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: increasing threads for stdout?
Post: RE: increasing threads for stdout?
| I remember this from the original thread about that problem from way back.
So my question would be what settings can we change to make the --stdout usage for generating the list of mangles faster? |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
16,842 |
06-02-2013, 03:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: increasing threads for stdout?
Post: increasing threads for stdout?
| I haven't run hashcat to generate mangles for quite a while, but trying the new 0.45 (hashcat-cli64.exe) in --stdout mode piped to a file seemed to run slower than I remembered, and I noticed it was o... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
16,842 |
06-02-2013, 01:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: increasing threads for stdout?
Post: RE: increasing threads for stdout?
| Maybe a formal specified mangle output file mode is needed, as opposed to stdout. |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
16,842 |
06-02-2013, 06:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: M needed for Q?
Post: M needed for Q?
| In the changes for hashcat v0.42, some "JtR compatible" memory rules were added:
type: feature
file: hashcat-cli
desc: added new rule function (JtR compatible): Q - query the memory and reject th... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
0 |
3,154 |
06-02-2013, 08:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: increasing threads for stdout?
Post: RE: increasing threads for stdout?
| What was more fresh in my mind that that the same dictionary and ruleset took a few seconds to run as an attack, but several hours to output the mangles to a file.
As pointed out, stdout isn't real... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
16,842 |
06-03-2013, 02:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: increasing threads for stdout?
Post: RE: increasing threads for stdout?
| Watching my taskbar HD LED while hashcat is doing the mangles shows very infrequent writes, so quite a bit of processing is happening between the writes, so I still don't think the I/O involving my HD... |
|
Kgx Pnqvhm |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
16,842 |
06-04-2013, 12:32 AM |
