|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Intel openCL
Post: RE: Intel openCL
|
atom Wrote: (12-31-2011, 11:39 PM)
--
yes, CPU integration into oclHashcat-plus is planed in a VERY VERY later release. till that, use hashcat CPU :)
--
First off, let me say that hashcat rules! The... |
|
Vulpix |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
26,626 |
01-12-2012, 02:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel openCL
Post: RE: Intel openCL
|
atom Wrote: (01-12-2012, 10:05 AM)
--
The Intel GPUs are not supported by their own runtime. My motivation for "just" adding the CPU is not very high although you can use hashcat CPU as an alternativ... |
|
Vulpix |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
26,626 |
01-12-2012, 11:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
Post: RE: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
| Can someone check out the speed of DES on the 7970 for me, pretty please? In oclHashcat-lite.
I'm getting 80000k/s (80M/s) on my 5970 and I just wanna see how well this card does in comparison. |
|
Vulpix |
Hardware
|
52 |
175,211 |
01-13-2012, 03:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Worst documentation and usability EVER
Post: RE: Worst documentation and usability EVER
| It was easy to understand the documentation, however for a few moments, I had a big problem figuring out how to create the mask for brute force attack... for one simple reason - there's a line that sa... |
|
Vulpix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,185 |
01-13-2012, 12:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
Post: RE: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
| I own the 5970 and I've never had problems with it. It's a good card and plays even the most modern games on high settings; so I really have no reason to upgrade.. but then again even if I did, invest... |
|
Vulpix |
Hardware
|
52 |
175,211 |
01-15-2012, 03:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Please help at ocl accelerated sha1($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Please help at ocl accelerated sha1($salt.$pas...
|
Quote:
--
You're wrong; it states that oclHashcat-lite supports this type of hash. In fact, a performance result's been posted in the main section of the page with the results :3
sha1($pass.$salt)... |
|
Vulpix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,817 |
01-17-2012, 07:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Please help at ocl accelerated sha1($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Please help at ocl accelerated sha1($salt.$pas...
| Well oclHashcat-lite basically does mainly bruteforce. It is just called attacking with a mask because that's how you do it.
?l lowercase, ?u uppercase ?d digits ?s special symbols, or you can create... |
|
Vulpix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,817 |
01-17-2012, 08:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Long passwords
Post: RE: Long passwords
| 341Â 427Â 877Â 364Â 219Â 557Â 396Â 646Â 723Â 584
That is the amount of possible passwords =P
That is 341 octillion, 427 septillion, 877 sextillion, 364 quintillion, 219 quadrillion... |
|
Vulpix |
General Help
|
5 |
12,193 |
01-24-2012, 07:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with bruteforcing with GPU
Post: RE: Problem with bruteforcing with GPU
| You only gave hashcat " ?l " as the mask, meaning a single lower-case letter of the alphabet.
If you want to brute-force a password of more characters, you need to add the respective amount of them t... |
|
Vulpix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,601 |
01-28-2012, 12:19 AM |
