Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views Posted [asc]
    Thread: How to test(crack) RAR?
Post: RE: How to test(crack) RAR?

silvia Wrote: (08-21-2015, 02:42 PM) -- output hashcat.rar:$RAR3$*1*REDACTED*00000000*16*0*1*REDACTED*33:1::hashcat.txt -- You'd better delete that hash before you get banned! It's against the rul...
rico Old oclHashcat Support 4 32,962 08-21-2015, 03:05 PM
    Thread: planning display adapter change
Post: RE: planning display adapter change

Or you could just do what I did - buy an old used Radeon HD 5970. If you have the PSU for it (and 1x6-pin & 1x8-pin connectors) and don't mind a card that pulls ~300W then one of these is about 400% t...
rico Hardware 6 8,733 08-21-2015, 12:52 PM
    Thread: planning display adapter change
Post: RE: planning display adapter change

Dunno where you're getting ~25% faster from. The GTX 750 is at least ~50% faster than the 4870.
rico Hardware 6 8,733 08-21-2015, 12:10 PM
    Thread: hashcat and linux
Post: RE: hashcat and linux

kirini Wrote: (08-21-2015, 11:57 AM) -- I had that min-pw parameter earlier. -- Well it wasn't there in the command you posted. You should really copy-paste the EXACT command you're using otherwise...
rico General Talk 6 9,796 08-21-2015, 12:01 PM
    Thread: hashcat and linux
Post: RE: hashcat and linux

hashcat command line version applies masks of incremental lengths, i.e. first try ?a than ?a?a, etc. Seems like ?a?a?a?a?a?a [6] is taking a long time (no surprise there) so add "--pw-min=8" to jump s...
rico General Talk 6 9,796 08-21-2015, 11:21 AM
    Thread: planning display adapter change
Post: RE: planning display adapter change

You will have to decide yourself if performance or power consumption is more important to you but the GTX 750 is by far the fastest in your list, running on Linux or Windows (I don't think it makes a ...
rico Hardware 6 8,733 08-21-2015, 11:11 AM
    Thread: oclHashcat v1.36 slow on Windows 10
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36 slow on Windows 10

Ah, I see what you mean: D:\Network\hashcat\cudaHashcat-1.37>cudaHashcat64.exe -m 5600 -b cudaHashcat v1.37 starting in benchmark-mode... Device #1: GeForce GTX 760, 2048MB, 1137Mhz, 6MCU Ha...
rico Old oclHashcat Support 6 15,654 08-19-2015, 08:43 PM
    Thread: oclHashcat v1.36 slow on Windows 10
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.36 slow on Windows 10

Well whadda ya know, v1.37 to the rescue. Nice work atom! D:\Network\cudaHashcat-1.37>cudaHashcat64.exe -m 2500 -b cudaHashcat v1.37 starting in benchmark-mode... Device #1: GeForce GTX 760, 20...
rico Old oclHashcat Support 6 15,654 08-18-2015, 07:35 PM
    Thread: 5870 vs 6870
Post: RE: 5870 vs 6870

I have a local [slightly updated/modified] copy of https://golubev.com/gpuest.htm in a spreadsheet. Can confirm numbers: 5870: 79,036 H/s WPA 6870: 58,579 H/s WPA 5870 is 35% faster than 6870. ...
rico Hardware 6 14,305 08-18-2015, 12:06 PM
    Thread: oclHashcat v1.36 slow on Windows 10
Post: oclHashcat v1.36 slow on Windows 10

Hi all, Yes, I've been a silly boy, jumping into Windows 10 x64 before knowing much about it (and before there's a driver for my old Soundblaster too apparently!). Anyways, I've installed the ne...
rico Old oclHashcat Support 6 15,654 08-17-2015, 10:08 PM