|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: increment gives invlaid mask error
Post: RE: increment gives invlaid mask error
| WPA passphrases require a minimum length of 8. I'm also not sure if/how the --increment option is applied in this hybrid attack mode - maybe it's not meant to be used outside a direct mask attack? |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,881 |
12-13-2016, 04:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rookie question on masks
Post: RE: Rookie question on masks
| Bad cap. Try again.
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6126.html |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,411 |
12-22-2016, 12:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Unknown hash and original: not identifieably, is hashcat able to find out?
Post: RE: Unknown hash and original: not identifieably, ...
|
tiator Wrote: (01-10-2017, 04:02 PM)
--
Is it possible to had hashcat the hash and a text file with the unhashed value, and hashcat is able to identify it?
--
Sort of. Put the passphrase (unhashed ... |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
2 |
5,508 |
01-11-2017, 11:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Parse Error
Post: RE: Parse Error
| No attack mode specified. Add -a 3
Custom charset is -l instead of -1. Change to -1 ?u?d?s
I haven't seen your hashlist format so possibly try without --username
Double-check that -m 3000 (a... |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
3 |
8,278 |
01-15-2017, 12:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Parse Error
Post: RE: Parse Error
| https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes
Those hashes aint -m 3000 (LM) but could be -m 1000 (NTLM). The "Line-length exception" message is because your first hash is 31 bytes instead of 3... |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
3 |
8,278 |
01-15-2017, 01:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Keyspace List for WPA on Default Routers
Post: RE: Keyspace List for WPA on Default Routers
| a-z = 26 chars
0-9 = 10 chars
=
?
38 chars, len 12. Keyspace is 38^12 = 9,065,737,908,494,995,456
calexico Wrote: (01-19-2017, 06:38 AM)
--
Yes, this is the default passphrase. And yes, I ha... |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
182 |
305,386 |
01-20-2017, 01:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Great stuff, handshake capturing always a tricky business. I just gave cap2hccapx a quick spin but didn't have much luck either I'm afraid. cap2hccapx seems to identify incomplete handshakes as good?
... |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,646 |
02-07-2017, 01:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Thanks, atom. I won't be able to get back to my PC to send the .cap for another 10 hours (if you even still need it). |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,646 |
02-07-2017, 12:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Polish letters - office
Post: RE: Polish letters - office
| No idea, mate, but v3.30 was released over a month ago. You should at least try that first. |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,166 |
02-07-2017, 01:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811)
Post: RE: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mod...
| That command is all over the place! "--hex-charset" why? "-1 charsets/DES_full.charset"? You never use the -1 charset. "-o example.dict"? Outputting to a wordlist? "--increment-min 4"???? You just sai... |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,984 |
02-07-2017, 02:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Thanks again, works great with hashcat-3.30+119 on Windows 10 x64.
I would suggest adjusting the reported hashrate though. I got very excited to see a huge speed bump and thought some new optimisat... |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,646 |
02-07-2017, 10:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811)
Post: RE: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mod...
| Take a look at the mask in my post again. You also never mentioned what happened when you tried it. You tried it, right? |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,984 |
02-08-2017, 11:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Did atom not already answer that earlier in this thread?! https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6273-post-33445.html#pid33445 |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,646 |
02-08-2017, 06:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I, too, read it a couple of times and then nodded knowingly... |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,646 |
02-08-2017, 07:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
| Yeah, like just put that in a function. |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,583 |
02-13-2017, 12:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Maybe you're not the only one interested in that AP, i.e. MAC address spoofer out there? |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,646 |
02-16-2017, 11:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat64.exe not valid win32 app
Post: RE: Hashcat64.exe not valid win32 app
| Ya know, that actually sounds familiar to me. I'm fairly sure this happened to me a while back too - never did figure out what went wrong with my setup but reinstalling hashcat fixed it. Make sure to ... |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,795 |
02-21-2017, 01:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| I don't know if this is the same issue as reported in that 2015 link but I do know that hashcat v3.30 uses a new format .hccapx file now instead: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6273.html
You shou... |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,322 |
02-22-2017, 11:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Unless the password changed in that 4 hour window then there's no need to do what you're proposing as there's no performance penalty with multiple handshakes for the same AP. If you still really need ... |
|
rico |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,646 |
02-26-2017, 10:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: CPU vs GPU
Post: RE: CPU vs GPU
| Read your posted benchmarks again. They say (and royce too) that your GPU is almost 10 times faster than your CPU.
k != M |
|
rico |
hashcat
|
21 |
44,484 |
02-27-2017, 01:38 AM |
