|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Inaccurate number
Post: RE: Inaccurate number
| if you use usernames and sort the file, the hashes can still be non-unique.
there could be multiple users having the same password and hash. so the sort -u might not do what you think it does (beca... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
13 |
3,874 |
12-13-2019, 05:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Special Character for hashcat rules
Post: RE: Special Character for hashcat rules
|
Code:
--
$_ $0 $1
--
[hr]
explanation:
to append more than one character, you need to apply more than one rule (https://hashcat.net/wiki/?id=rule_based_attack) |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,345 |
12-13-2019, 06:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Inaccurate number
Post: RE: Inaccurate number
| --show is not for cracking, it is used to show the already cracked passwords (AFTER cracking)
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_can_i_show_previously_cracked_passw... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
13 |
3,874 |
12-13-2019, 06:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Special Character for hashcat rules
Post: RE: Special Character for hashcat rules
| yeah, you are completely wrong.
there is a whole table of "functions" (https://hashcat.net/wiki/?id=rule_based_attack#implemented_compatible_functions) and $, ^, T, D, O, x etc are not referring to... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,345 |
12-13-2019, 07:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Inaccurate number
Post: RE: Inaccurate number
| why would you need to unique the hashes ? just for testing ?
again, it depends on if you have usernames within the hash file... a line is not unique unless both the username:hash is unique , but fo... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
13 |
3,874 |
12-13-2019, 09:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: I need an explanation
Post: RE: I need an explanation
| maybe the algorithm is like explained here:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/data-protection/consumer-apis/password-hashing?view=aspnetcore-3.1
and therefore you could use -m ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
2 |
1,065 |
12-15-2019, 07:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OSX 10.12.6 Sierra - Token length exception
Post: RE: OSX 10.12.6 Sierra - Token length exception
| https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/1697#issuecomment-425702306
you can just truncate it (to the same length the example hash has https://hashcat.net/wiki/example_hashes)
The more seriou... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
1 |
855 |
12-16-2019, 07:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat in VM
Post: RE: hashcat in VM
| The problem here might be that you probably need to use -S or pipe or otherwise the plains will be rejected already on host (you may be able to work around it, by always providing 24 bytes, but that's... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
12 |
4,959 |
12-21-2019, 06:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: full parallel power of device
Post: RE: full parallel power of device
| -a 3 means mask attack (https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attack)
so what you basically did is run a dictionary (the dictionary attack would be -a 0) with -a 3, i.e. run each word in the ma... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
6 |
1,844 |
12-23-2019, 08:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: usually high number of arguments within restore file
Post: RE: ERROR: usually high number of arguments within...
| "Unusually high number of arguments"
means that you corrupted the .restore file.
maybe your text editor did some strange things to the restore file (which contains binary data too)
It's actuall... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
1 |
784 |
12-23-2019, 07:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
Post: RE: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
| Wouldn't it make MUCH more sense to find out the root of the problem and see when it was introduced and test how to fix it ?
Using old versions is always bad, they might soon be deprecated (also dr... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
31 |
12,819 |
12-17-2019, 08:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
Post: RE: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
| We would need somebody to test and troubleshoot the hashcat "versions"/changes/commits on github to identify the problem. that is what I was trying to say.
If we know it can be fixed by using the v... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
31 |
12,819 |
12-18-2019, 09:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
Post: RE: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
| wow, that's a great discovery (altrough it still doesn't make much sense.. maybe driver bug?)
could you please first test the latest git version without any modification (fresh clone, make clean, g... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
31 |
12,819 |
12-22-2019, 12:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
Post: RE: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
| Hey fromdusktillpwn,
thank you again for this amazing troubleshooting and testing. We appreciate this very much, because we know this can be kinda tedious to test all the commits and find the righ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
31 |
12,819 |
12-23-2019, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
Post: RE: ATTENTION! OpenCL kernel self-test failed.
| Thanks for the update. I'm still confused about the fact that it now seems to work for you with different beta versions (NOT just with the latest one) and that your original post says that even older ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
31 |
12,819 |
12-23-2019, 07:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Creating sha512(sha512($pass).$salt) kernel
Post: RE: Creating sha512(sha512($pass).$salt) kernel
| shouldn't the first hash be 128 hex characters (instead of 64) ? Just test with "echo -n hashcat | sha512sum", it is exactly 128 hex chars long.
you would also need to test if the salt needs to be ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
3 |
1,391 |
12-25-2019, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Creating sha512(sha512($pass).$salt) kernel
Post: RE: Creating sha512(sha512($pass).$salt) kernel
| in OpenCL/m20710_a0-pure.cl I don't see that ctx.w0[0] is modified directly etc...
why don't you just start with 2 very easy blocks of init/update(s)/final for the first SHA512 hash and init/update... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
3 |
1,391 |
12-25-2019, 09:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom mask generator
Post: RE: Custom mask generator
| this "sort of ranking" is called markov and hashcat supports it... the custom charset+mask "-2 ?l?d ?2?2?2?2" will do exactly that... you can test with --stdout |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
11 |
5,304 |
12-26-2019, 11:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How can find a sha256 hash start with ***** with hashcat & markprocessor?
Post: RE: How can find a sha256 hash start with ***** wi...
| have a look at -m 5100 = Half MD5 which does more or less exactly what you describe (just for MD5 instead of sha256)... the problem with too small prefixes is that there will be too many results/colli... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
2 |
1,127 |
12-26-2019, 11:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom mask generator
Post: RE: Custom mask generator
| The restore file format can do that... https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=restore#c_structure
masks_pos is the start/offset (it starts counting with 0) of the total number of masks |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
11 |
5,304 |
12-26-2019, 09:49 PM |
