Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: A question about constant Exhausted
Post: RE: A question about constant Exhausted
Try this: https://hashcat.net/faq/wrongdriver |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
2,281 |
03-11-2020, 01:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed
Post: RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly dis...
the format changed with https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/pull/2292 (requested here: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/2255).
The --help output should reflect the new format that should be... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,804 |
03-18-2020, 10:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed
Post: RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly dis...
that's by the way the default format... you only need to use --outfile-format parameter if it is different from "1,2" |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,804 |
03-19-2020, 01:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed
Post: RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly dis...
What is the hash type that you are using ? What's the hashcat version (try with https://hashcat.net/beta) ?
The default with 1,2 is to use "$HEX[" and the hexadecimal chars and "]" at the end if th... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,804 |
03-19-2020, 04:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed
Post: RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly dis...
Yeah, but that is not the default value, but just an example within the --help:
Code:
--
Options Short / Long | Type | Description | Example
--
it clearly says, that it is an Example . The def... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,804 |
03-19-2020, 04:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rules attack - restore not working
Post: RE: Rules attack - restore not working
just explain what you see and experience.
Do you mean that it takes a while until the next restore point is reached ?
Maybe it's only a matter of having a little bit of patience until the current ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,537 |
04-18-2020, 09:30 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rules attack - restore not working
Post: RE: Rules attack - restore not working
The status at the end must be
Code:
--
Status...........: Aborted (Checkpoint)
--
The value of the Restore.Point must be increased (greater than 0)... Attention: the progress line is not the c... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,537 |
04-19-2020, 04:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rules attack - restore not working
Post: RE: Rules attack - restore not working
My guess is that with that many rules, the workload profile (-w 2 ? or -w 3) and the amount of GPUs, it might just take a lot of time to reach the next checkpoint.
With -w 1 more checkpoints will be ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,537 |
04-19-2020, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Combinator
Post: RE: Combinator
it's all about acceleration, read: https://hashcat.net/faq/morework
if there is much I/O slowdown, but little new input for hashcat, the GPU can't really accelerate, it will stay idle... instead if... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,615 |
05-20-2020, 08:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat Mask Attack
Post: RE: Hashcat Mask Attack
the hashcat way of storing mask is hashcat mask files (hcmask):
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attack#hashcat_mask_files
my.hcmask:
Code:
--
123456789,?d-,abcdABCD?d,?3-,?1?2?4?3?3?... |
|
philsmd |
General Talk
|
8 |
2,070 |
05-29-2020, 09:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat Mask Attack
Post: RE: Hashcat Mask Attack
for these numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
you could just write several different mask like this:
Code:
--
123456789,?1
1?d
0123... |
|
philsmd |
General Talk
|
8 |
2,070 |
05-30-2020, 07:30 AM |
|
|
Thread: Generator of fortune
Post: RE: Generator of fortune
what's going on here? one (actually 2) completely new forum accounts without any previous posts suddently talking about a tool with very strange description and furthermore a tool that was already con... |
|
philsmd |
User Contributions
|
8 |
2,022 |
06-15-2020, 11:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
Post: RE: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
does it work with -D 1 added to the command line:
Code:
--
hashcat -m 1000 -a 3 -O -D 1 easyntlm.txt ?l?l?l?l
--
To me this really seems like a (very dangerous) driver bug. since the self-test... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,281 |
06-25-2020, 12:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
Post: RE: Bruteforce not finding simple 4 letter hash?
the -D 1 parameter does whitelist your CPU device (the Intel i7) cpu (see --help for all the command line parameters that hashcat supports and what they mean).
that means that with -D 1 you are testi... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,281 |
06-25-2020, 12:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: RE: Rules in 16800 don't work?
it's exactly like undeath explained above.
Without the -S slow mode the passwords that are too short (from the dict) are rejected immediately, while the -S mode is slow because it mangles the words w... |
|
philsmd |
General Talk
|
8 |
1,341 |
06-30-2020, 11:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: First Attempt, does this look alright?
Post: RE: First Attempt, does this look alright?
The main problem now is that it's quite a long password.
We "normally"/generally say that a length of 8-9 is the max that can be brute-forced (but attention: this depends a lot on hash type and/or ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,060 |
07-16-2020, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: Devices being skipped
Post: RE: Devices being skipped
which hashcat version ? did you try with beta and release version from https://hashcat.net/beta/ and https://hashcat.net/hashcat accordingly ?
please also post the output of:
Code:
--
hashcat -... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,249 |
07-25-2020, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Devices being skipped
Post: RE: Devices being skipped
yeah, this really looks like a problem/bug in the alias detection code (see all other devices are detected as Alias for #1).
I will ask atom (the main hashcat developer of hashcat) if he knows how ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,249 |
07-25-2020, 02:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: Devices being skipped
Post: RE: Devices being skipped
With this new change to the hashcat alias detection code all devices should be distinguished (in your particular case the PCI lanes for all devices were the same, 00:00.0, only the PCI domain 0001-000... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,249 |
07-27-2020, 03:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: First Attempt, does this look alright?
Post: RE: First Attempt, does this look alright?
you could use mask files https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attack#hashcat_mask_files
or just set
-1 "012345 6789" for the first byte of your mask (i.e. any set of chars, charset, that ha... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,060 |
07-16-2020, 08:03 PM |