|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: cuModuleLoad() 209 error
Post: RE: cuModuleLoad() 209 error
| From https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/
Quote:
--
NV users require ForceWare 319.37 or later
--
I don't think it will work for you w/ an older driver just because a newer driver is difficult (h... |
|
philsmd |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
15,175 |
11-17-2013, 12:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: | attacks using hashcat-utils
Post: RE: | attacks using hashcat-utils
| The problem here is the communication between completely different processes (combinator.bin and oclHashcat-plus64.bin)... the pipe symbol reflects this very well... ( look at | as a wall between the ... |
|
philsmd |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
14,167 |
12-05-2013, 03:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: | attacks using hashcat-utils
Post: RE: | attacks using hashcat-utils
| Please keep in mind, that while for you this 2 things seem to end up doing the same or at least have several points in common, ... the feature to natively support combinations + rules is very differe... |
|
philsmd |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
14,167 |
12-05-2013, 04:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: | attacks using hashcat-utils
Post: RE: | attacks using hashcat-utils
| UPDATE: let's consider -a 1 w/ -r
the problem here is that devs need to come up w/ a nice and very fast solution to do both the combination and apply rules (possible within the gpu kernel, otherwise i... |
|
philsmd |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
14,167 |
12-05-2013, 04:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: reuse restore file after upgrade (was oclHashcat v1.01)
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.01
| As far as I know, (by accident) for the next version of oclHashcat, there is a new feature that will "upgrade" your .restore file when it detects that the restore file could still be used (if nothing ... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,058 |
01-04-2014, 12:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: reuse restore file after upgrade (was oclHashcat v1.01)
Post: RE: reuse restore file after oclHashcat upgrade (w...
| The problem is that when you are running some (mingw etc) shell commands, you need to know what they do...
For example, if you want to modify the file "att5.restore" then you shouldn't touch the "oclH... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,058 |
01-06-2014, 12:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need help with redmine hashes
Post: RE: Need help with redmine hashes
| I can confirm that there was a slight problem w/ the hash type number of redmine hashes...
Next version will work w/ -m 7600 but it doesn't work w/ current release version because of that slight has... |
|
philsmd |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
12,427 |
02-05-2014, 05:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP
Post: RE: HELP
|
qiaoqiao372 Wrote: (03-16-2014, 12:24 AM)
--
Platform Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1214.3)
--
This is definitely not 13.12 (13.12 should be Platform version 1348.5 ), yours is much older, even o... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
15,665 |
03-16-2014, 01:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: cudahashcat
Post: RE: cudahashcat
| Moved to oclHashcat forum...
For any doubts about how to select the right -m (--hash-type) values and / or how the hash (+ salt) should look like, pls consider reading this wiki page:
https://hashc... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
35,567 |
04-13-2014, 12:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: combination attack help
Post: RE: combination attack help
| @gato_wero
1. pls do not hijack threads like you just did since:
problem with syntax -k ?d?d (which is not valid/possible) is very different from your problem
2. pls see https://hashcat.net/trac/... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,771 |
10-08-2014, 02:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.21
Post: RE: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.2...
| 1. there were a lot of changes and atom already mentioned that the default tuning was changed heavily among those versions. Also to avoid users continously reporting freezes, hangs etc
Therefore, you... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
17,418 |
10-16-2014, 03:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: No output file... why?
Post: RE: No output file... why?
| Please do not give bad/wrong advices.
--help shows
-o, --outfile=FILE Define outfile for recovered hash
so it is --outfile or short -o |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,283 |
12-03-2014, 11:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Post: RE: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
| see https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack
There is a rule to truncate password candidates:
Truncate @ N 'N Truncate word at position N
If you wish you could also use the "multi ru... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,387 |
01-14-2015, 09:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Post: RE: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
| You can do it, as mentioned above. With multi rule feature:
philsmd Wrote: (01-14-2015, 09:42 PM)
--
If you wish you could also use the "multi rule" feature, see https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,387 |
01-14-2015, 10:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
Post: RE: truncating passwords instead of rejecting them
| there was a different but similar, much more recent problem:
https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/515
It works here with 1.32 beta which will be released soon, afaik. |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
10,387 |
01-14-2015, 10:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to emulate 3 dictionaries?
Post: RE: How to emulate 3 dictionaries?
|
turbohaje Wrote: (01-16-2015, 02:39 PM)
--
cudaHashcat64.exe -m 0 -a 1 -o results.txt -j $. -k [email protected] --outfile-format=3 hashes.txt names.txt surnames.txt
This should generate name.surname@gm... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
8,446 |
01-16-2015, 02:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Two hashes one result - why?
Post: RE: Two hashes one result - why?
| There is not much you need to learn here. It is very simple.
OS X v10.8+ (-m 7100) uses PBKDF2, which allows to have a variable output (digest/hash) length.
oclHashcat doesn't care much about this... |
|
philsmd |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,330 |
03-04-2015, 04:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug with incremental and --restore?
Post: RE: Bug with incremental and --restore?
| Could you please give more details about the command you are trying to run (without posting hashes of course)? |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,966 |
04-03-2015, 03:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug with incremental and --restore?
Post: RE: Bug with incremental and --restore?
| Most important question:
why do you use --force... the warning clearly says, if you use --force, you shouldn't report problems and/or ask for support
Is there any reason you use --force? Does it work... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,966 |
04-03-2015, 05:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug with incremental and --restore?
Post: RE: Bug with incremental and --restore?
| If you use this command to start the attack:
Code:
--
cudaHashcat64.exe -m 1500 -a 3 --session x -o out.txt --outfile-format 3 -w 2 -i --increment-min 1 --increment-max 7 desunix.txt -1 ?l?d ?1?1?... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,966 |
04-03-2015, 06:26 PM |
