Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Remove doesn't work on dictionnary attack ?
Post: RE: Remove doesn't work on dictionnary attack ?
First, please make sure that you use the newest release version of cpu hashcat (0.50).
It is important that your md5_0.hash file is uniqued, so no duplicate hashes (use sort -u md5_0.hash | sponge ... |
|
philsmd |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
11,130 |
12-01-2015, 05:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Remove doesn't work on dictionnary attack ?
Post: RE: Remove doesn't work on dictionnary attack ?
Autrui Wrote: (12-01-2015, 06:01 PM)
--
Code:
--
No hashes loaded
--
--
It seems that it worked for you too: If it says "No hashes loaded" the file "md5_0.hash" is probably empty (and therefor... |
|
philsmd |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
11,130 |
12-01-2015, 06:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: Remove doesn't work on dictionnary attack ?
Post: RE: Remove doesn't work on dictionnary attack ?
I can't reproduce the problem here; no matter what I try.
Maybe you have some special setup: for instance a remote drive (not a local disk), the file/directory does not have write permissions etc.
A... |
|
philsmd |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
11,130 |
12-02-2015, 11:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: remove unsupported rules
Post: RE: remove unsupported rules
The answer is to use cleanup-rules.exe from hashcat-utils (https://hashcat.net/tools/hashcat-utils/ ) |
|
philsmd |
General Help
|
3 |
6,298 |
12-24-2014, 04:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Replace rule - but not all at once
Post: RE: Replace rule - but not all at once
see the rules page on the wiki: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack#using_p_nth_instance_of_a_character_with_positional_rules |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,115 |
08-28-2018, 05:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Replace rule - but not all at once
Post: RE: Replace rule - but not all at once
multiple substitutions should be no problem because currently a single rule could consist of up to 31 rule functions: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack#limitations
The only pro... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,115 |
08-29-2018, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: Request: d3ad0neV3 rule
Post: RE: Request: d3ad0neV3 rule
archive.org to the rescue:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131104033239/https://ob-security.info/files/d3ad0neV3.rule |
|
philsmd |
General Help
|
2 |
6,056 |
09-22-2014, 11:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore Fails
Post: RE: Restore Fails
No, that's also not 100% correct.
The FAQ (https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions) already says that "The only parameters allowed when restoring a session are --restore and... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
12 |
8,646 |
12-29-2017, 09:17 AM |
|
|
Thread: Restore Fails
Post: RE: Restore Fails
the full command is:
Code:
--
hashcat64 --restore --session save
--
|
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
12 |
8,646 |
12-29-2017, 09:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore hashcat with no session saved
Post: RE: Restore hashcat with no session saved
using crunch makes NO sense here.
hashcat supports mask attack with -a 3 (see https://hashcat.net/wiki/?id=mask_attack), something like:
Code:
--
hashcat -m 0 -a 3 -w 3 -O hashes.txt ?H?H?H?H?H... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
5 |
2,410 |
02-24-2019, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore hashcat with no session saved
Post: RE: Restore hashcat with no session saved
it's not clear from the screenshot if you used
-O and -w 3 |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
5 |
2,410 |
02-24-2019, 02:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore Point reset while mask processing
Post: RE: Restore Point reset while mask processing
To me what you are describing above doesn't sound like a bug.
What oclHashcat really does is update the restore point as soon as it is safe to do so: mark the keyspace unit (KU) as done if and only... |
|
philsmd |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
8,323 |
11-30-2015, 12:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore value is greater than keyspace
Post: RE: Restore value is greater than keyspace
This is indeed an interesting problem, but very difficult to reproduce.
I *think* this is a glitch and hashcat while changing from one mask to another (in your case to or from mask number 1592 of 9... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
6 |
2,894 |
06-02-2019, 09:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Restore value is greater than keyspace
Post: RE: Restore value is greater than keyspace
good news, I was able to reproduce this problem with a very dedicated mask file (masks with small keyspace after masks with large keyspace, repeated thousands of times).
The problem seems to be loc... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
6 |
2,894 |
06-02-2019, 03:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore value is greater than keyspace
Post: RE: Restore value is greater than keyspace
no, that's the wrong value.
the values should be from 580008 to the next keyspace (from the "large" 580008 value to something smaller, that is why it's a "greater than" problem, new mask is smaller... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
6 |
2,894 |
06-02-2019, 03:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore value is greater than keyspace
Post: RE: Restore value is greater than keyspace
thanks again mrmike
This problem was now fixed (git version includes the fix, soon also beta/release) with this commit: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/ca31ef43aff1726113aaef85d06aa5c3cbc... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
6 |
2,894 |
08-06-2019, 02:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore.Sub.#1. beginner question
Post: RE: Restore.Sub.#1. beginner question
We normally say that hashes that are "raw" or that are "unsalted" have no salt. And this statement is perfectly correct.
but you could also see it like this: a hash type/algorithm that does not hav... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
4 |
871 |
07-01-2020, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore.Sub.#1. beginner question
Post: RE: Restore.Sub.#1. beginner question
I think "guessed" is the wrong term. Most things (except of the password) are normally known when it comes to hash cracking. Normally you won't need to guess iterations counts (or cost factors), they ... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
4 |
871 |
07-01-2020, 08:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restoring a WPA session from hashcat 5.1.0 in 6.0.0?
Post: RE: Restoring a WPA session from hashcat 5.1.0 in ...
You could be lucky since the data itself that is stored was not changed directly (actually never changed for years, exactly for "compatibility reasons"... but see reason for updated versoin below), se... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
2 |
664 |
06-17-2020, 03:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: resume hashcat from known progress
Post: RE: resume hashcat from known progress
It's not safe in general to restore from some arbitrary progress value.
If you know the restore file that would be much safer:
Code:
--
Restore.Point....: x/y
--
You can use the x value wit... |
|
philsmd |
hashcat
|
1 |
559 |
03-29-2020, 09:49 PM |