|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Privilege Escalation Hash Type
Post: RE: Privilege Escalation Hash Type
| The '=' at the end *migth* be a padding, often used by base64/32 encoding.
+1 you need to know how the software writes it. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
7 |
2,037 |
11-08-2019, 07:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic and conversion to hashcat formats
Post: RE: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic...
| Wondering if message pairs are still included, and easy to find/decode, in the new format?
M2M3 or M3M4 are good evidence that the password was correct. |
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
648 |
487,320 |
01-12-2020, 12:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: In The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) No device found/left
Post: RE: In The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-Open...
| Do not use sudo please.
What's the output of hashcat -I ?
If there is nothing, you need to install Nvidia/AMD/OpenCL drivers. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
1 |
785 |
01-12-2020, 12:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
| Using hashcat-5.1.0 beta 1610 :
Code:
--
hashcat.exe -m 22000 hash dic
--
works OK with sample hash WPA*01*9d42bfc4ab79cf3a3a85761efd2a0cf0*e8e61d2bfe07*e21f445660bb*3c3429452aba22e9a7a6*** (passw... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-18-2020, 12:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
| Any reason to not support it ? All other modes have the username implementation.
I guess this is a Feature Request for github :) |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-18-2020, 02:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
| Ok. Legacy.. :)
Mode 16800 does support --username as it's only hex. That's why I thought mode 22000 (hex as well) would support it as well.
Anyway thanks for your common work to merge 16800 and 2500 ... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-18-2020, 02:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
| Hi Zerbea,
Fully agree to use hex instead of ASCII.
My initial question was why mode 16800 accepts --username but mode 22000 does not, because both inputs are in hex.
Having a look at the source code... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-19-2020, 04:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
| No worries :)
Amazing job you've done BTW. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-19-2020, 08:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
| This allows a brilliant fine tuning =) |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-20-2020, 12:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: rocktastic -> PACK
Post: RE: rocktastic -> PACK
| Do you have any statistics on well-known hashlist? Huge wordlists are not always the best for slow hashes. |
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
2 |
1,626 |
01-22-2020, 12:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: question about hashcat speed slow?
Post: RE: question about hashcat speed slow?
| The one on the homepage is not the same as the one on the beta page.
The latest is beta. Try with it. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
7 |
2,060 |
01-25-2020, 02:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: password 8 letters
Post: RE: password 8 letters
| Do not use hashcat on a laptop..
If you want better performance use hashcat a better GPU like 2080. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
6 |
1,841 |
01-27-2020, 11:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Integer overflow detected
Post: RE: Integer overflow detected
| Hum, the mask u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d with mode 2500 is clearly *not* doable in a lifetime with your GTX1050.
Nobody on Earth can run this mask even with 100 x 2080ti. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
2,733 |
01-30-2020, 10:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: how to do it better ???
Post: RE: how to do it better ???
| By restoring the settings I guess you want to be able to set the setting back to its original value.
Just backup the config BEFORE applying the patch.
eg. for Windows
- Backup the key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHI... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,323 |
01-30-2020, 10:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How crack this hash?
Post: RE: How crack this hash?
| Do not post hashes!
According to https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes this algorithm is not supported. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
1 |
873 |
02-25-2020, 11:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA256
Post: RE: SHA256
| You missed the bruteforce part:
hashcat64.exe -m 1400 -a 3 -i --increment-min=1 --increment-max=64 -o result.txt -1 ?d?l hashes.txt ?1*64 times
-1 ?d?l means digits + loweralpha
?1*64 times means ... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
1 |
943 |
02-29-2020, 02:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: No hashes loaded
Post: RE: No hashes loaded
| - Paste output of "hashcat --version".
- How did you create your hccapx file?
If you still have the original .cap file, I strongly advice to extract a mode 22000 hash instead of a hccapx. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
3 |
1,210 |
03-12-2020, 03:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hash Extraction
Post: RE: Hash Extraction
| Note that you can do .cap -> hash (mode 22000)
No need to use hccapx. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
2 |
1,045 |
03-13-2020, 03:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to use Hashmode: 2501
Post: RE: How to use Hashmode: 2501
| Please do not write in CAPITALS.
Never used this mode before, so I assume:
- mode 2501 (or 22001) need a known PMK
- mode 2500 (or 22000) DOES compute PMK through hash_pbkdf2(), while mode 2501 don't... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
2 |
972 |
03-21-2020, 06:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2080 ti 2500 50kh's
Post: RE: 2080 ti 2500 50kh's
| -w 4 is an optimization, a workload profile, and 4 is 'nightmare', good for headless server.
Regarding to benchmark, look at this one (https://www.onlinehashcrack.com/tools-benchmark-hashcat-gtx-1080-... |
|
Mem5 |
General Talk
|
5 |
1,477 |
03-22-2020, 12:07 AM |
