Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from October 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.
hashcat Forum › Search
Results

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views Posted [asc]
    Thread: New User (need help)
Post: RE: New User (need help)
I help people who ask questions. You didn't.
 Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 4 10,228 02-17-2012, 11:39 PM
    Thread: New User (need help)
Post: RE: New User (need help)
Hum.. Do whatever you want ! This forum is for problems report. Ask a precise question and we'll answer.
Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-lite Support 4 10,228 02-17-2012, 08:10 PM
    Thread: OSX hash
Post: RE: OSX hash
Sorry for the hashes. Quote: -- You don't get the same hash because you don't use the salt. -- Quote: -- also notice the salt is encoded in hex -- So I did : $salt_as_string = hex2string($...
 Mem5 General Help 4 8,737 02-15-2012, 08:14 PM
    Thread: OSX hash
Post: OSX hash
Hi guys, I don't know where to post my question so I hope it is OK here. My question deals about OSX hashes. I read that a OSX hash is a salted SHA1 (salt = first 8 chars) Code: -- OSX_hash : sal...
 Mem5 General Help 4 8,737 02-15-2012, 04:48 PM
    Thread: .htpasswd crack ?
Post: RE: .htpasswd crack ?
Wonderful ! Thanks.
 Mem5 General Help 3 32,068 02-15-2012, 04:44 PM
    Thread: .htpasswd crack ?
Post: .htpasswd crack ?
Does *hashcat cracks .htpasswd encryption (len = 13) ? I think it's crypt() Code: -- admin:xxxxxxxxxxxxx --
Mem5 General Help 3 32,068 02-15-2012, 09:17 AM
    Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
atom do you plan an update for LM for hashcat (cpu) ?
Mem5 Feature Requests 31 77,613 02-05-2012, 09:11 PM
    Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
Ok, that's nice too. Actually with lite version when the right part of LM hash is not cracked but the left one is, the result is not displayed.
Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements 16 56,855 02-05-2012, 11:14 AM
    Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
Thanks atom ! I am not agree with you mastercracker, if you have a long list of 32-chars hashes you obviously do not want to split all hashes in 2. Also, for found hashes it better to have the entire...
 Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements 16 56,855 02-04-2012, 11:41 AM
    Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
Many thanks!
 Mem5 Feature Requests 31 77,613 02-02-2012, 11:56 PM
    Thread: Which card for notebooks ?
Post: RE: Which card for notebooks ?
Number of shaders is the same as "CUDA Cores" ? shader clock speed is "Processor Clock (MHz)" ? Thanks.
 Mem5 Hardware 5 10,663 02-01-2012, 08:25 PM
    Thread: Which card for notebooks ?
Post: RE: Which card for notebooks ?
I know, but I have no choice.
 Mem5 Hardware 5 10,663 01-31-2012, 08:46 AM
    Thread: Which card for notebooks ?
Post: Which card for notebooks ?
Which graphic card do you recommend for gpu cracking on notebooks ? Thanks.
 Mem5 Hardware 5 10,663 01-30-2012, 10:40 PM
    Thread: WPA minimal len
Post: WPA minimal len
Hi, Maybe a stupid question but as the standard WPA only accepts passwords at least 8 characters, is oclhashcat - in order to optimize - removes the word less than 8 characters in the case of a di...
 Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 1 5,008 01-28-2012, 10:24 AM
    Thread: Aircack-ng with -J on windows ?
Post: RE: Aircack-ng with -J on windows ?
Yes but I have many files and I would like to batch them :)
 Mem5 General Help 3 9,426 01-21-2012, 08:32 PM
    Thread: SHA1 bad result
Post: RE: SHA1 bad result
I'll PM you.
 Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 3 7,544 01-21-2012, 12:18 PM
    Thread: Aircack-ng with -J on windows ?
Post: Aircack-ng with -J on windows ?
Hi, I downloaded aircak-ng for windows but it was given without -J option (for hashcat wpa). Where can I found a aircrack-ng version with -J ? Thanks.
 Mem5 General Help 3 9,426 01-21-2012, 11:22 AM
    Thread: SHA1 bad result
Post: SHA1 bad result
Hi, oclhashcat-plus 0.07 gave me as a result : Quote: -- 139f69c93c042496a8e958ec5930662c6cccafbf:1:31 -- It seems wrong : SHA('1') is 356A192B7913B04C54574D18C28D46E6395428AB Any ideas ? ...
 Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 3 7,544 01-12-2012, 01:45 PM
    Thread: How to bruteforce?
Post: RE: How to bruteforce?
Quote: -- For example: the new T0XlC.rule set is really cool, try it on rockyou.txt or any other good dictionaries. -- Please where can I find this t0xic.rule file ? Thanks.
Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 24 63,020 01-06-2012, 06:08 PM
    Thread: What about --increment for bruteforcing ?
Post: RE: What about --increment for bruteforcing ?
Hum.. is it the only solution ?!
 Mem5 Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 3 7,717 01-04-2012, 10:55 PM