|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: cracking a domain cachedump
Post: RE: cracking a domain cachedump
| NTLM hashes are 32 chars long, without username, and cracked with mode 1000.
"it didn't crack anything" -> not the problem of oclhashcat ! it's yours problem : bad wordlist, bad bruteforce mask, e... |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
16,229 |
11-08-2014, 02:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cannot remove a hash
Post: RE: Cannot remove a hash
| cut, grep, awk, etc for windows : https://sourceforge.net/projects/unxutils/ and https://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/coreutils.htm |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,956 |
11-12-2014, 09:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: how to brute a few handshakes ?
Post: RE: how to brute a few handshakes ?
|
c506178 Wrote: (12-01-2014, 10:46 PM)
--
please explain how I can to brute several handshake at the same time
--
Code:
--
cat 1.hccap 2.hccap 3.hccap > all.hccap
--
An use oclhashcat mask attack ... |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,510 |
12-01-2014, 11:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Low speed on GTX 970 v1.32 with WPA2
Post: RE: Low speed on GTX 970 v1.32 with WPA2
| Theoretical speed would be 149 889 h/sec. So you are good.
source : https://golubev.com/gpuest.htm |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,776 |
01-17-2015, 12:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Post: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
| Hi there,
I have downloaded the last oclhashcat (v1.32) , but I have WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31 :
Win 7 / GPU R9-290 / Driver AMD 14.9
Code:
--
oclHashcat-1.31\oclHashcat64.exe -... |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,762 |
02-16-2015, 12:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Post: RE: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
| Ok I got it. Thanks undeath.
So I can not use small wordlists anymore with v1.32 ? What is is considered as a small/big wordlist ? |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,762 |
02-18-2015, 09:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashes found in pot file
Post: RE: hashes found in pot file
| From help :
Code:
--
-o, --outfile=FILE Define outfile for recovered hash
--
|
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,125 |
02-21-2015, 02:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
Post: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -...
| Hello,
Fresh install of Windwos 8.1, Catalyst 14.9, on Radeon R9 290
Running oclhashcat 1.36, benchmark mode :
Code:
--
WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
--
and
Code:
--
HWMon.GPU.#1... |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
16,068 |
07-25-2015, 11:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Post: RE: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
|
atom Wrote: (02-16-2015, 01:05 PM)
--
1.32 uses AMP kernel (candidates calculated on GPU), therefore you need bigger wordlists as with 1.31.
--
Ok, it is a regression? What's the solution ? I can n... |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,762 |
02-16-2015, 11:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
| Hello,
Fresh install of Windwos 8.1, Catalyst 14.9, on Radeon R9 290
Apparently (?) same bug as https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/593
Running oclhashcat 1.36, cmdline :
Code:
--
oclHashcat64.exe ... |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
07-25-2015, 11:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
Post: RE: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(...
| Hi wgmmmx, just checked it, the card is normal and OK in the device manager. |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
16,068 |
07-25-2015, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: RE: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
| Same error (randomly) with this command line (wpa) :
oclHashcat-1.36\oclHashcat64.exe --remove --gpu-temp-abort=90 -w 3 -m 2500 -o res.txt aaa.hccap *.dic |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
07-26-2015, 09:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: RE: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
| Please note that version 1.35 gives much less error "bug!!" than 1.36.
I hope it will help you ! |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
07-28-2015, 11:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
Post: RE: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(...
| Any help please ?
Should I post in TRAC ? |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
16,068 |
08-03-2015, 04:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
Post: RE: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(...
| Is it a driver issue ? Or a card issue ? |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
16,068 |
08-07-2015, 04:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
Post: RE: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(...
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
16,068 |
08-18-2015, 10:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: RE: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
| v1.37 also gives me, randomly, the "bug!!" output.
Do you have any ideas of the problem ? |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
08-23-2015, 10:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: RE: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
| Hum, I found where it may comes from : one of my wordlist.
A word inside certainly causes ocl v1.37 an lower to crash (prints bug!!)
Any idea how to spot it ?
I used ULM to clean it : purge unicode c... |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
08-23-2015, 11:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: RE: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
08-23-2015, 01:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: RE: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
| Tested with :
v1.31 : OK
v1.32 : OK
v1.33 : bug
v1.34 : bug
v1.35 : bug
v1.36 : bug
v1.37 : bug |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
08-23-2015, 01:21 PM |
