Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Problem with 11300
Post: RE: Problem with 11300
5.0.0 is a scam.
The ONLY location where you can safely download hashcat is here https://hashcat.net |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,232 |
09-27-2018, 08:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: 0 H/S.... What im doing wrong?
Post: RE: 0 H/S.... What im doing wrong?
Quote:
--
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3056.9 MH/s (6.35ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:32 Thr:256 Vec:1
--
Yes it works.
But is it doing what you want? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,277 |
10-24-2018, 11:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: 0 H/S.... What im doing wrong?
Post: RE: 0 H/S.... What im doing wrong?
Do you know the length? The keyboard used? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,277 |
10-25-2018, 09:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Status: Exhausted Bitcoin Wallet Passphrase Recovery
Post: RE: Status: Exhausted Bitcoin Wallet Passphrase Re...
Bitcoin wallet & 15 chars is not doable in a human life.
By the way your problem is the last '?' character, remove it :
C:\Users\wq\Desktop\hashcat-4.1.0>hashcat64.exe -a 3 -m 11300 wallethash.txt ?... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
5,905 |
02-14-2019, 01:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Using hashcat-5.1.0 beta 1610 :
Code:
--
hashcat.exe -m 22000 hash dic
--
works OK with sample hash WPA*01*9d42bfc4ab79cf3a3a85761efd2a0cf0*e8e61d2bfe07*e21f445660bb*3c3429452aba22e9a7a6*** (passw... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-18-2020, 12:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Any reason to not support it ? All other modes have the username implementation.
I guess this is a Feature Request for github :) |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-18-2020, 02:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Ok. Legacy.. :)
Mode 16800 does support --username as it's only hex. That's why I thought mode 22000 (hex as well) would support it as well.
Anyway thanks for your common work to merge 16800 and 2500 ... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-18-2020, 02:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Hi Zerbea,
Fully agree to use hex instead of ASCII.
My initial question was why mode 16800 accepts --username but mode 22000 does not, because both inputs are in hex.
Having a look at the source code... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-19-2020, 04:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
No worries :)
Amazing job you've done BTW. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-19-2020, 08:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
This allows a brilliant fine tuning =) |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-20-2020, 12:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Integer overflow detected
Post: RE: Integer overflow detected
Hum, the mask u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d?u?d with mode 2500 is clearly *not* doable in a lifetime with your GTX1050.
Nobody on Earth can run this mask even with 100 x 2080ti. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
2,733 |
01-30-2020, 10:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat v6.1.0
Post: RE: hashcat v6.1.0
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
10 |
4,018 |
07-28-2020, 07:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: How to work with polish letters
Hi,
How to insert some of the polish special letters ?
Is there something like "?d" ou "?l" for special (accent) letters ?
Thanks |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-27-2011, 02:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
sorry I forgot to mention : I don't know if my special letters are taken into account because of this strange charset written :
https://data.imagup.com/11/1131791462.png
cmd line :
https://data.imag... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-27-2011, 02:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
I saved it in UTF-8. Is it good too ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-27-2011, 11:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
Thanks.
I don't have UTF-7.. I have the choice between :
Quote:
--
UTF-8
Unicode Big Endian
Unicode
ANSI
--
Which one should I use ?
|
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-29-2011, 11:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
Does not work as expected :( |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-30-2011, 01:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
Thanks.
The "Charset" still strange as th image posted before :/ |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-30-2011, 10:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ideal for PC
Post: RE: Ideal for PC
forumhero Wrote: (04-16-2012, 06:59 AM)
--
cpu doesn't matter for hash cracking with hashcat.
--
It DOES matter ! hashcat is CPU-based. The more powerful CPU, the faster you get. |
|
Mem5 |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,077 |
04-16-2012, 07:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ideal for PC
Post: RE: Ideal for PC
KT819GM Wrote: (04-16-2012, 04:55 PM)
--
It's even enough to use Atom cpu for SL3 ...
--
Do you mean that the CPU is not used at all and is useless for oclhashcat ? |
|
Mem5 |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,077 |
04-16-2012, 10:43 PM |