|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| Hi,
Using the lite version 0.09 I put a value for the temperature :
Code:
--
oclHashcat-lite64.exe --gpu-accel 800 --gpu-loops 1024 --gpu-watchdog=90 --outfile-watch 0 --restore-timer 0 --runtime... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-20-2012, 01:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| I tried with 91, 92 and 88, but each time :
"Watchdog: Temperature limit disabled"
ATI CCC last version. |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-20-2012, 02:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| Same "Watchdog: Temperature limit disabled" ! |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-20-2012, 05:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| This thread is about an another problem but it might be a driver issue..
atom do you confirm ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-20-2012, 07:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| The same :
Quote:
--
oclHashcat-lite64.exe --gpu-accel 800 --gpu-loops 1024 --gpu-watchdog 80 --pw-min 8 --custom-charset1 ?l?d?s?u -m0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
oclHashc... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-21-2012, 08:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| The same :
Quote:
--
oclHashcat-lite64.exe --gpu-accel 800 --gpu-loops 1024 --pw-min 8 --custom-charset1 ?l?d?s?u -m0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
oclHashcat-lite v0.9 by... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-22-2012, 08:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| I've just had this strange message during a crack session :
Quote:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => WARN: ADL_Overdrive5_Temperature_Get(): -5
WARN: ADL_Overdrive5_Temperature_Get(): -5
WARN:... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-23-2012, 10:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-27-2012, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| OK, how can I do that ? Are there any risks ?
Note: With ocl-plus the temperature watchdog and monitoring is working fine. |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-28-2012, 11:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| example :
Quote:
--
oclHashcat-plus v0.08 by atom starting...
(...)
Watchdog: Temperature limit set to 90c
Device #1: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
(...)
HW.Monitor.#1: 90% GPU, 87c Temp
--
|
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-29-2012, 07:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| I've just checked it, it does not work with -lite but it does work with -plus
:/ |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-29-2012, 09:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| Ok thank you. I'll wait.
No need to upgrade my gpu bios ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,197 |
05-30-2012, 07:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09
| Thanks ! great release as always ! |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
21 |
94,670 |
09-09-2012, 03:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 6.0.0
Post: RE: hashcat 6.0.0
| Awesome work, thanks to atom & team & contributors ! |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
21 |
87,684 |
06-18-2020, 02:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: need help about crack hash
Post: RE: need help about crack hash
|
nhatcto Wrote: (09-07-2014, 07:42 PM)
--
i try YES and didn't see anything diffirent in folder hashcat
--
It creates a file when you are agree with it. |
|
Mem5 |
General Help
|
20 |
32,449 |
09-07-2014, 08:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [.Net 4.5] Leukocyte_GUI_for_oclHashcat (GUI wrapper)
Post: RE: [.Net 4.5] Leukocyte_GUI_for_oclHashcat (GUI w...
| Not usefull for me as I prefer dealing with cmdline.
But nice work !
Please can you add tooltips over buttons and checkboxes/labels, will help users to know what they're doing. |
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
19 |
35,840 |
03-01-2015, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: MD5 and v3.00
| Hello,
I'm facing an issue with the new release of hashcat v3.00.
"in theory" MD5 is faster in v3.00 than in v2.01 by +18,63% according to the comparison table (GTX 980)
Quote:
--
On my GTX 980 :
... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,388 |
07-02-2016, 01:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| So.. pure bruteforcing on 3.00 is faster than v2.01 ; but rules and wordlist attacks is slower.
Weird ? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,388 |
07-02-2016, 10:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| I don't think so.
I am pretty sure the wordlist is transferred to GPU before starting the crack. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,388 |
07-02-2016, 11:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| So, let me summarize a bit :
- pure bruteforcing : v3.00 is faster
- Straight wordlist (no rules) : v3.00 is faster
- wordists + rules : v2.01 is faster BUT buggy
Am I right ? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,388 |
07-05-2016, 08:31 PM |
