Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: rocktastic -> PACK
Post: RE: rocktastic -> PACK
Do you have any statistics on well-known hashlist? Huge wordlists are not always the best for slow hashes. |
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
2 |
1,626 |
01-22-2020, 12:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule file (very common 'complex' passwords)
Post: RE: Rule file (very common 'complex' passwords)
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
6 |
14,855 |
01-29-2014, 09:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rules attack - restore not working
Post: RE: Rules attack - restore not working
which algorithm? command line? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
8 |
1,537 |
04-17-2020, 06:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rules test
Post: RE: Rules test
--stdout is your friend:
Code:
--
> echo kevin | hashcat64 --stdout -j "c"
Kevin
> echo kevin | hashcat64 --stdout -r best64.txt
kevin1
...
--
|
|
Mem5 |
General Talk
|
2 |
2,318 |
11-05-2018, 08:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
Post: RE: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
Have you tried to cat them all in one file? |
|
Mem5 |
General Talk
|
5 |
3,007 |
10-23-2019, 09:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
Post: RE: Running hashcat on multiple hash files
slawson Wrote: (10-23-2019, 09:40 PM)
--
copy /b *.16800 all.16800
--
Pay attention,
/B Indicates a binary file
While 16800 mode is text only. |
|
Mem5 |
General Talk
|
5 |
3,007 |
10-29-2019, 09:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Sappphire Radeon R9 290 TRI-X benchmark
Post: RE: Sappphire Radeon R9 290 TRI-X benchmark
It is also very silent. 6990 is amazingly noisy. |
|
Mem5 |
Hardware
|
2 |
7,805 |
06-29-2014, 12:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Seemingly no-crack attemps
Post: RE: Seemingly no-crack attemps
it does do something :
Quote:
--
Progress..: 1/1 (100.00%)
--
It only tries one password.
Clue : "Input.Mode: Mask (mas)" |
|
Mem5 |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,105 |
11-19-2012, 09:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
I've just checked, I left the progress at 0.16%, I launch the restore, it begun at 0.00%. |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-14-2013, 07:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-14-2013, 08:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
OK.
But why is it working with you ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-15-2013, 07:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
I understand.
So the switch "--restore-timer=NUM Save restore file each NUM seconds" is not properly what it means ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-15-2013, 11:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
atom is right :)
I let the first command run during 1 hour (progress : 2%)
Then I restore it : started at 2%/1 hour.
Cool :) |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-16-2013, 07:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA-256 64 char password
Post: RE: SHA-256 64 char password
Why are you sure it's 64 chars? You generated it? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
2 |
574 |
05-26-2020, 11:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Post: RE: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Nice atom thank you. Any date for the next release ?
Ok Rolf I'll see! |
|
Mem5 |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
18,774 |
03-18-2012, 05:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 bad result
Post: RE: SHA1 bad result
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,548 |
01-21-2012, 12:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Post: RE: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Oh yes, thank you.
For my curiosity, if the salt ends with ':', it's the same format ?
Code:
--
hash:salt:
--
|
|
Mem5 |
General Help
|
9 |
15,119 |
02-27-2013, 09:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Post: RE: SHA1 underscore salted ?
I mean the username is "MyUsername:"
I create a hashfile :
Code:
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:MyUsername:
--
Should it work with -m 120 ? |
|
Mem5 |
General Help
|
9 |
15,119 |
02-28-2013, 09:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Post: RE: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Nice, thank you. It worked well :) |
|
Mem5 |
General Help
|
9 |
15,119 |
03-02-2013, 11:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA256
Post: RE: SHA256
You missed the bruteforce part:
hashcat64.exe -m 1400 -a 3 -i --increment-min=1 --increment-max=64 -o result.txt -1 ?d?l hashes.txt ?1*64 times
-1 ?d?l means digits + loweralpha
?1*64 times means ... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
1 |
945 |
02-29-2020, 02:59 PM |