Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: [Python] Split LM hashes
Post: RE: [Python] Split LM hashes
Nice, now I can put my python script to /dev/null :] |
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
5 |
17,667 |
09-25-2012, 07:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: status from gpu cracking?
Post: RE: status from gpu cracking?
look at the examples given with the program + read the wiki. |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
18,279 |
04-05-2013, 08:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: Session issue
I want to use sessions, but does not work, what am I doing wrong ??
using oclHashcat-plus-0.15\oclHashcat-plus64.exe
Code:
--
oclplus.exe -a 3 -m 2500 --session=wpa_10digits --restore-timer=1... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-13-2013, 10:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
I've just checked, I left the progress at 0.16%, I launch the restore, it begun at 0.00%. |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-14-2013, 07:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-14-2013, 08:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
OK.
But why is it working with you ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-15-2013, 07:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
I understand.
So the switch "--restore-timer=NUM Save restore file each NUM seconds" is not properly what it means ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-15-2013, 11:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
atom is right :)
I let the first command run during 1 hour (progress : 2%)
Then I restore it : started at 2%/1 hour.
Cool :) |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-16-2013, 07:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: bcrypt hash with salt
Post: RE: bcrypt hash with salt
Read help/wiki/usage.
You missed something do to (dictionnary attack ? mask ? etc.), that's why hashcat is waiting for your input in stdin. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
12 |
18,675 |
11-22-2018, 10:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: bcrypt hash with salt
Post: RE: bcrypt hash with salt
What's your GPU card?
Do some math. Aasssuming you have a GTX 1080 Ti, you will try ~23'000 passwords per seconds.
You said "I don't know the length or characters used".
Assuming mixalpha+digits =>... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
12 |
18,675 |
11-23-2018, 12:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Post: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
|
Mem5 |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
18,774 |
03-18-2012, 04:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Post: RE: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Nice atom thank you. Any date for the next release ?
Ok Rolf I'll see! |
|
Mem5 |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
18,774 |
03-18-2012, 05:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.081 *HOTFIX*
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.081 *HOTFIX*
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
5 |
19,044 |
05-08-2012, 09:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: Can't crack anything!
Post: RE: Can't crack anything!
Same error for me ; GTX 980 on Win 8.1, on dictionnary attack, whatever the algorithm. ; driver 359.06
Back to v1.37 |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
16 |
19,062 |
12-05-2015, 12:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: Can't crack anything!
Post: RE: Can't crack anything!
Shall we wait for a v2.01 ? |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
16 |
19,062 |
12-05-2015, 11:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat Benchmarking
Post: RE: Hashcat Benchmarking
On the page https://thepasswordproject.com/oclhashcat-plus-0.08b44_benchmarking_script_for_windows
the algo 112 (Oracle 11g) is not well formatted :
Code:
--
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -a 3 --custom-chars... |
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
8 |
19,307 |
05-20-2012, 02:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat Benchmarking
Post: RE: Hashcat Benchmarking
Ok thank you M@lik :D
I'll wait the new version. |
|
Mem5 |
User Contributions
|
8 |
19,307 |
05-21-2012, 09:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: brute-forcing not working with me
Post: RE: brute-forcing not working with me
https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
19,507 |
08-02-2012, 07:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ideal for PC
Post: RE: Ideal for PC
forumhero Wrote: (04-16-2012, 06:59 AM)
--
cpu doesn't matter for hash cracking with hashcat.
--
It DOES matter ! hashcat is CPU-based. The more powerful CPU, the faster you get. |
|
Mem5 |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,077 |
04-16-2012, 07:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ideal for PC
Post: RE: Ideal for PC
KT819GM Wrote: (04-16-2012, 04:55 PM)
--
It's even enough to use Atom cpu for SL3 ...
--
Do you mean that the CPU is not used at all and is useless for oclhashcat ? |
|
Mem5 |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,077 |
04-16-2012, 10:43 PM |