|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Ideal for PC
Post: RE: Ideal for PC
| OK.
What about MD5 or NTLM ? |
|
Mem5 |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,077 |
04-17-2012, 07:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA2 Key not found
Post: RE: WPA2 Key not found
| "oclhashcat-plus32.exe -m 2500 -a 1 --outfile C:\hashcat\hash\GAST1234.txt C:\hashcat\hash\GAST1234.hccap rock.txt rock.txt
Why double rock.txt ?!
Quote:
--
Password of WPA2 file GAST1234.hccap is "... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
20,213 |
08-12-2012, 07:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.9 - MyBB?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.9 - MyBB?
| --hash-type 2611 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaa
--hash-type 2711 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
--hash-type 2811 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaa |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
20,305 |
04-18-2012, 08:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.37
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.37
| Amazing, thanks atom & team !! :] |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
6 |
20,975 |
08-19-2015, 08:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: How to work with polish letters
| Hi,
How to insert some of the polish special letters ?
Is there something like "?d" ou "?l" for special (accent) letters ?
Thanks |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-27-2011, 02:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
| sorry I forgot to mention : I don't know if my special letters are taken into account because of this strange charset written :
https://data.imagup.com/11/1131791462.png
cmd line :
https://data.imag... |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-27-2011, 02:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
| I saved it in UTF-8. Is it good too ? |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-27-2011, 11:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
| Thanks.
I don't have UTF-7.. I have the choice between :
Quote:
--
UTF-8
Unicode Big Endian
Unicode
ANSI
--
Which one should I use ?
|
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-29-2011, 11:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
| Does not work as expected :( |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-30-2011, 01:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to work with polish letters
Post: RE: How to work with polish letters
| Thanks.
The "Charset" still strange as th image posted before :/ |
|
Mem5 |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
21,125 |
09-30-2011, 10:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: MD5 and v3.00
| Hello,
I'm facing an issue with the new release of hashcat v3.00.
"in theory" MD5 is faster in v3.00 than in v2.01 by +18,63% according to the comparison table (GTX 980)
Quote:
--
On my GTX 980 :
... |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,391 |
07-02-2016, 01:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| So.. pure bruteforcing on 3.00 is faster than v2.01 ; but rules and wordlist attacks is slower.
Weird ? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,391 |
07-02-2016, 10:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| I don't think so.
I am pretty sure the wordlist is transferred to GPU before starting the crack. |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,391 |
07-02-2016, 11:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| So, let me summarize a bit :
- pure bruteforcing : v3.00 is faster
- Straight wordlist (no rules) : v3.00 is faster
- wordists + rules : v2.01 is faster BUT buggy
Am I right ? |
|
Mem5 |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,391 |
07-05-2016, 08:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 Card Recommendations
Post: RE: 1080 Card Recommendations
| I have a 1080 FE and a 1080 Gaming.
The first one (FE) has an unique and small fan, which is *very* noisy when hashcat runs with -w3 during few time : this little fan rotates at bottom to try to re... |
|
Mem5 |
Hardware
|
18 |
21,558 |
08-27-2016, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking 10 digit password with CudaHashcat
Post: RE: Cracking 10 digit password with CudaHashcat
| 1:30 sec for 10 digits ? You did something wrong.. |
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
21,695 |
08-20-2014, 07:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking 10 digit password with CudaHashcat
Post: RE: Cracking 10 digit password with CudaHashcat
|
Mem5 |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
21,695 |
08-26-2014, 08:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat gui md5 problem
Post: RE: hashcat gui md5 problem
| So you don't know the password. And you did not read https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attack |
|
Mem5 |
General Help
|
12 |
21,810 |
08-24-2012, 06:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat gui md5 problem
Post: RE: hashcat gui md5 problem
|
tori Wrote: (08-24-2012, 05:04 PM)
--
I don't know how many letters and if it's upper or lower case
--
Start with a a dictionnary attack, and a bruteforce attack. |
|
Mem5 |
General Help
|
12 |
21,810 |
08-25-2012, 02:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat gui md5 problem
Post: RE: hashcat gui md5 problem
| It depends on your card. Each card is different. ATI are better because they have more cores. |
|
Mem5 |
General Help
|
12 |
21,810 |
08-25-2012, 12:46 PM |
