|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Performance
Post: RE: Performance
| Why couldn't you install x86_64 system on VPS ? Try your previous command with '-n 24'. |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
28 |
50,467 |
01-26-2013, 11:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Performance
Post: RE: Performance
| Well, then just start hashcat with standart amount of 8 threads (don't force number of threads with -n or --threads) and let us know how it's going. |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
28 |
50,467 |
01-27-2013, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
| Well, I see you've booted up Backtrack such as hacker, LoL!
Escape charset defined with -1 and don't use '--increment[-min,-max]' with straight mode. |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
19 |
54,077 |
05-01-2013, 02:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
| Why don't you look at help and wiki ? There's everything what you need. |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
19 |
54,077 |
05-01-2013, 03:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
| You can adjust utilization with -n and -u parameters, but 60 kh/s is a good speed for this highly iterated algorithm... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
19 |
54,077 |
05-01-2013, 05:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
| Very nice work, Hash-IT :) |
|
Kuci |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,401 |
01-13-2013, 09:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.00
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.00
|
Kuci |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
17 |
61,140 |
12-07-2013, 11:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force / Mask
Post: RE: Brute Force / Mask
| Hmm, what about reading help and wiki ? |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
61,416 |
05-15-2013, 05:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force / Mask
Post: RE: Brute Force / Mask
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
61,416 |
05-15-2013, 07:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
epixoip Wrote: (10-11-2013, 07:31 PM)
--
txczwgffr Wrote: (10-11-2013, 05:59 PM)
--
Do you not think hashcat would be better if more people could contribute?
--
absolutely not.
--
Why do you th... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-11-2013, 08:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| atom, epixoip, radix...they all know how the project collaboration and management work. That's why I don't understand why hashcat is closed-source. They probably don't believe in community anymore aft... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-11-2013, 11:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
atom Wrote: (10-12-2013, 09:15 PM)
--
hashcat does not need to be open source.
--
If you feel it this way, I cannot argue with you. But at least if you could make some kernel interface, with which w... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-12-2013, 10:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
Kuci Wrote: (10-12-2013, 10:35 PM)
--
if you could make some kernel interface, with which we could be able to create our own kernels with algorithm we would like to use, that would be great. I think ... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-14-2013, 06:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| Yes, it would be a nice compromise. |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-14-2013, 09:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
epixoip Wrote: (10-14-2013, 02:41 PM)
--
you know what else is a nice compromise? not having to pay money to use the program.
--
Hmm, what is the reason for having proprietary but not payed softwar... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-14-2013, 04:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| Well, I wanted to contribute to JtR around year before, but that project is messy and it's not messy because of open-source character of that project, but because of decision of project managers to pu... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-12-2013, 10:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Starting with OSX
Post: RE: Starting with OSX
|
KZug Wrote: (08-03-2013, 03:40 PM)
--
- you can always drag hashcat into terminal to save you the typing (of a long path because you skipped the above)
--
What about tab completion ? Have you heard... |
|
Kuci |
General Help
|
10 |
70,315 |
08-04-2013, 09:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Starting with OSX
Post: RE: Starting with OSX
|
KZug Wrote: (08-05-2013, 07:21 PM)
--
Kuci Wrote: (08-04-2013, 09:03 AM)
--
KZug Wrote: (08-03-2013, 03:40 PM)
--
- you can always drag hashcat into terminal to save you the typing (of a long path ... |
|
Kuci |
General Help
|
10 |
70,315 |
08-05-2013, 08:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
| Could you make ,,Non Catalyst 12.8 driver error" just a warning ? It's really annoying when I have to add --force parameter when oclHashcat is just wrong and I really have these drivers or when I'm fo... |
|
Kuci |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
01-13-2013, 12:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
| I haven't installed any other drivers than Catalyst 12.8. I've just reinstalled AMD App SDK (same version) and then it started showing this message. |
|
Kuci |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
01-13-2013, 10:41 AM |
