Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Starting with OSX
Post: RE: Starting with OSX
KZug Wrote: (08-03-2013, 03:40 PM)
--
- you can always drag hashcat into terminal to save you the typing (of a long path because you skipped the above)
--
What about tab completion ? Have you heard... |
|
Kuci |
General Help
|
10 |
70,315 |
08-04-2013, 09:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: Starting with OSX
Post: RE: Starting with OSX
KZug Wrote: (08-05-2013, 07:21 PM)
--
Kuci Wrote: (08-04-2013, 09:03 AM)
--
KZug Wrote: (08-03-2013, 03:40 PM)
--
- you can always drag hashcat into terminal to save you the typing (of a long path ... |
|
Kuci |
General Help
|
10 |
70,315 |
08-05-2013, 08:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
epixoip Wrote: (10-11-2013, 07:31 PM)
--
txczwgffr Wrote: (10-11-2013, 05:59 PM)
--
Do you not think hashcat would be better if more people could contribute?
--
absolutely not.
--
Why do you th... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-11-2013, 08:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
atom, epixoip, radix...they all know how the project collaboration and management work. That's why I don't understand why hashcat is closed-source. They probably don't believe in community anymore aft... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-11-2013, 11:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
atom Wrote: (10-12-2013, 09:15 PM)
--
hashcat does not need to be open source.
--
If you feel it this way, I cannot argue with you. But at least if you could make some kernel interface, with which w... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-12-2013, 10:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
Kuci Wrote: (10-12-2013, 10:35 PM)
--
if you could make some kernel interface, with which we could be able to create our own kernels with algorithm we would like to use, that would be great. I think ... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-14-2013, 06:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
Yes, it would be a nice compromise. |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-14-2013, 09:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
epixoip Wrote: (10-14-2013, 02:41 PM)
--
you know what else is a nice compromise? not having to pay money to use the program.
--
Hmm, what is the reason for having proprietary but not payed softwar... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-14-2013, 04:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
Well, I wanted to contribute to JtR around year before, but that project is messy and it's not messy because of open-source character of that project, but because of decision of project managers to pu... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,493 |
10-12-2013, 10:42 AM |
|
|
Thread: Brute Force / Mask
Post: RE: Brute Force / Mask
Hmm, what about reading help and wiki ? |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
61,416 |
05-15-2013, 05:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: Brute Force / Mask
Post: RE: Brute Force / Mask
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
61,416 |
05-15-2013, 07:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.00
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.00
|
Kuci |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
17 |
61,139 |
12-07-2013, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
Very nice work, Hash-IT :) |
|
Kuci |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,398 |
01-13-2013, 09:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Well, I see you've booted up Backtrack such as hacker, LoL!
Escape charset defined with -1 and don't use '--increment[-min,-max]' with straight mode. |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
19 |
54,077 |
05-01-2013, 02:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Why don't you look at help and wiki ? There's everything what you need. |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
19 |
54,077 |
05-01-2013, 03:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus64 MD5(unix) cracking help
You can adjust utilization with -n and -u parameters, but 60 kh/s is a good speed for this highly iterated algorithm... |
|
Kuci |
General Talk
|
19 |
54,077 |
05-01-2013, 05:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Performance
Post: RE: Performance
I think, all opterons are 64bit. So, why are you using 32bit binary ? |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
28 |
50,467 |
01-26-2013, 11:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Performance
Post: RE: Performance
Your OS is i686 ? Well, tell us, what CPU it is. |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
28 |
50,467 |
01-26-2013, 11:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Performance
Post: RE: Performance
Intel Xeon X5650 (https://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon%20X5650%20-%20AT80614004320AD%20(BX80614X5650).html): 6 cores, 12 threads. To sum up, you have two 64bit CPUs with total amount of 12 co... |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
28 |
50,467 |
01-26-2013, 05:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: Performance
Post: RE: Performance
Why couldn't you install x86_64 system on VPS ? Try your previous command with '-n 24'. |
|
Kuci |
Old hashcat Support
|
28 |
50,467 |
01-26-2013, 11:52 PM |