|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41 putting something other than hash in .pot file
Post: RE: hashcat 0.41 putting something other than hash...
|
Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: (11-27-2012, 01:25 AM)
--
Hashcat 0.41 64-bit for Windows is putting a hex string in the hashcat.pot file that is not the hash.
--
You are quite correct.
Consider the file of M... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,430 |
12-22-2012, 07:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| Possible problem with 0.12 - the ?F code appears to cause a problem in the following expression.
This was on Ubuntu 12.04, running 64 bit, with a M2070 graphics card in a Supermicro system. Removi... |
|
Waffle |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,217 |
01-03-2013, 08:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| How strange.
I cut-and-pasted the line from the message, and was able to duplicate it on my system:
./cuda --session=three -a 3 -m 0 -1 '?d?u?l?s?h?D?F?R' g2 '?1'
cuda: malloc.c:2451: sYSMALL... |
|
Waffle |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,217 |
01-04-2013, 05:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDto...
| I was able to duplicate this on an M2070, but _only_ in the 32 bit version. The 64 bit version worked fine (Ubuntu 12.04 - I didn't try the windows versions). |
|
Waffle |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
20 |
27,469 |
01-04-2013, 05:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Dealing with EOL characters
Post: Dealing with EOL characters
| Many of the hashes I am dealing with lately seem to have embedded end-of-line (\n) characters in them. What is the best way to represent these in password lists, for future attacks?
For example, ... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,371 |
01-14-2013, 07:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove not working correctly?
Post: --remove not working correctly?
| I ran across a very unusual problem just now.
I had a list I was working on, and wanted to check it. So, I removed my current files, and extracted the passwords from the .pot file, and ran it agai... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
13,424 |
01-14-2013, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove not working correctly?
Post: RE: --remove not working correctly?
| Of course, I did try that.
sort -u list10.orig >l10.txt
NOTE: press enter for status-screen
Input.Mode: Dict (/tmp/t1)
Index.....: 1/1 (segment), 724187 (words), 6901757 (bytes)
Recovered.:... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
13,424 |
01-14-2013, 11:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove not working correctly?
Post: RE: --remove not working correctly?
| Done yesterday in a private message.
My guess, based on further experiments, is a race condition. Using -n 1 seems to make it happen less often (or at all). Using -n 16 (on my hardware) makes it h... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
13,424 |
01-15-2013, 02:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Dealing with EOL characters
Post: RE: Dealing with EOL characters
| Ok. But, back to my original question, how does this help structure future attacks?
I see that the .pot/output file can be written as hex values in oclHashcat-plus (and somewhat less-so in the cpu h... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,371 |
01-15-2013, 02:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat wont bruteforce
Post: RE: hashcat wont bruteforce
| There's something fundamental wrong.
Try creating the hash with a known program, make it simple:
md5 -s "a"
for example.
If you can't crack that, then your distribution may be corrupt, o... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
29,574 |
01-15-2013, 09:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
| Nice job! I was surprised that they ran quite fast, as well! Well done. |
|
Waffle |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,361 |
01-19-2013, 05:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: DES -m 1500 supported in hashcat?
Post: DES -m 1500 supported in hashcat?
| Maybe I am confused. Is -m 1500 supported in Hashcat?
It's not shown in the --help output, but it appears to work. I say appears, because there is a bug if you try to use --remove - it corrupts t... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,069 |
02-24-2013, 07:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: DES -m 1500 supported in hashcat?
Post: RE: DES -m 1500 supported in hashcat?
| Thanks! I won't report the bug then. |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,069 |
02-27-2013, 01:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Posible bug using external salts -e
Post: RE: Posible bug using external salts -e
| Yes, I have this problem too. As the input file is being re-written (with the .new extension), it seems to grow without bounds, under certain conditions.
The solution is simple: Don't use the -remo... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
16,542 |
04-17-2013, 10:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Posible bug using external salts -e
Post: RE: Posible bug using external salts -e
| I wrote my own. It's quite a bit faster than using hashcat, especially if you are removing a lot of hashes.
so, for example:
hashcat -a 0 -m 2611 -e salts -o mytemp.out input.txt passwords.txt
... |
|
Waffle |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
16,542 |
04-18-2013, 03:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: All Chars = Big Chaos
Post: RE: All Chars = Big Chaos
| of course it is possible to write a rule for this.
^[tab]+0{
Insert a tab character at the start of the word. Increment it (0x9 -> 0xa). Rotate it into position. |
|
Waffle |
General Talk
|
8 |
14,734 |
05-04-2013, 04:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Saving calculated hashes
Post: RE: Saving calculated hashes
| A couple of other minor points, and a question: Why are you storing this in a database?
The minor points; when dealing with large amounts of data, it's important to remember that disk I/O isn't fr... |
|
Waffle |
General Talk
|
8 |
16,778 |
05-20-2013, 05:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug with complex rule ?
Post: RE: Bug with complex rule ?
| Please see bug 148 for a solution which I think is quite helpful. I've been using this in my code for the past month or so, and this fixes so many problems.
For example, when dealing with UNICODE ... |
|
Waffle |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,065 |
06-01-2013, 07:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug with complex rule ?
Post: RE: Bug with complex rule ?
| When I spoke with Atom about this a while back - in relation to this exact issue - he explained that there was no way to "conditionalize" (poor word, I know) the execution of rules, particularly on th... |
|
Waffle |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,065 |
06-01-2013, 09:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: A few questions about cracking
Post: RE: A few questions about cracking
| 1. Depends on what you are cracking. Human-generated passwords are predictable, and using a smaller set of "common" passwords will give spectacular results when working with human-generated hashes. ... |
|
Waffle |
General Help
|
4 |
13,781 |
06-01-2013, 09:49 PM |
