Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
Post: RE: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
Thanks Jardeath. Unfortunately the benchmark is not quite complete, but the results are very mixed - as expected.
Fisrt glance: The Radeon VII can most often not even gain a +20% over the Vega 64. ... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
17 |
12,532 |
02-12-2019, 04:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
Post: RE: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
You're cherry picking. As mentioned, Etherum takes a big profit out of fast memory. Meaningless for hashcat.
The 2080 tops out at 225W if not tweaked. No idea how you manage to see it anywhere clos... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
17 |
12,532 |
02-09-2019, 10:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
Post: RE: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
I'm afraid it is just a die shrink, since the architecture behind is still GCN5, although a bit tweaked. And again, faster and bigger memory is almost irrelevant for hashcat.
Take the Anandtech benc... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
17 |
12,532 |
02-09-2019, 02:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
Post: RE: AMD Radeon VII benchmarks(?)
Ether is just one hash algorithm and it prefers AMDs architecture. Plus fast memory, while hashcat does not. Not comparable at all.
I'd be surprised if the Radeon VII will be on par with the RTX2080.... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
17 |
12,532 |
02-08-2019, 10:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Nvidia RTX 2070 vs AMD Vega RX 64
Post: RE: Nvidia RTX 2070 vs AMD Vega RX 64
Nikos Wrote: (01-09-2019, 08:23 PM)
--
Vega 2nd generation at 7nm with 62% faster OpenCL performance than Vega64 could be a potential hashcat killer GPU.
--
It's "up to" 62% faster. The clock speed... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
6 |
5,766 |
01-17-2019, 12:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: Tesla T4 benchmarks
Post: RE: Tesla T4 benchmarks
You can always underclock GPUs to improve their hashes per watt ratio. A heavily undervolted RTX 2080 should do a similar trick as the T4. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
4 |
4,416 |
12-06-2018, 07:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: Performance issues RTX 2070 in hashcat.
Post: RE: Performance issues RTX 2070 in hashcat.
Are you using the -O for optimized kernel and -w 4 for highest workload? |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
4 |
7,943 |
11-22-2018, 10:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: 3x mining rig rx570 rocm problem
Post: RE: 3x mining rig rx570 rocm problem
You can specify the devices you want to use. Cut it down until it runs or bump up the RAM. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
7 |
5,368 |
11-02-2018, 04:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: 7000h/s (not 7000kh/s) on GTX 860m
Post: RE: 7000h/s (not 7000kh/s) on GTX 860m
johnbadcracker Wrote: (10-25-2018, 01:43 PM)
--
Thanks! That increased it to 20 000h/s but I not 20 000kh/s. Is that good for 860m when it comes to sha512crypt? The list has is like 70 hashes all wit... |
|
Flomac |
hashcat
|
7 |
4,330 |
10-25-2018, 11:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: beginner is cracking his first md5
Post: RE: beginner is cracking his first md5
Hello and welcome. Starting with the HashkillerGUI is a good idea, but you have to make a few changes. One is unchecking "CPU only", the other is to point the Hashcat Path to the right directory where... |
|
Flomac |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,730 |
10-06-2018, 07:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashrate for money - RTX 2080 or RTX 2080 Ti?
Post: RE: Hashrate for money - RTX 2080 or RTX 2080 Ti?
By simply calculating cores and clock rate it should be ~1/3 faster.
EDIT: Seems to be the 2080 Ti FE will be delivered these days. That's why there are no benchmarks out yet. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
4 |
5,276 |
10-02-2018, 05:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
Nikos, I never wanted to apologize to you, I just stand by my mistakes. You've pulled a tech discussion to the personal level.
Quote:
--
I'm not going to reply again with all the points that I was ... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-29-2018, 11:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
Thank atom, I didn't realize that. You never stop learning. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-29-2018, 11:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
Thanks cvsi, these results look more like what I've expected. No rerun needed.
I've updated the comparison sheet with the new values. Everything has shifted a bit, RTX 2080 now being 57% faster tha... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-27-2018, 06:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
Yep, the values of th 1080 seem a bit too slow. At least 7-zip is not ok.
@cvsi: Could you also run a benchmark for the 1080? Then we'd have the same system, OS & driver for the three cards. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-27-2018, 11:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
I've updated the benchmark comparison with the 1080 Ti.
Overall:
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 1080 Ti: +9%
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 1080: +63%
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 980: +197%
GTX 1080 Ti vs. GTX 1080: +49%
GTX 1080 vs. GTX ... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-26-2018, 10:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
Nikos,
although it might be a waste of time to throw more time on this discussion with you, let's just correct some things one and for all.
Nikos Wrote: (09-25-2018, 07:11 AM)
--
The benchmarks tha... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-26-2018, 09:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
Thanks for the benchmakrs guys, I'll add them tomorrow. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-24-2018, 07:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
The results are in. The standard benchmark values are compared since this makes most sense and keeps the list clear.
Overall:
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 1080: +63%
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 980: +197%
GTX 1080 v... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-23-2018, 09:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
Nikos Wrote: (09-23-2018, 02:08 PM)
--
@Flomac
It seems that you were wrong in all parameters of Turing architecture and implementation eventually.
--
Nope.
Quote:
--
RT cores are fixed-function n... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,308 |
09-23-2018, 09:09 PM |