|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| My speculation is also based on the V100 which is true in hardware and has been tested many times. The chip design of Volta and Turing seems to be very identical except for the missing Ray-cores on th... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-18-2018, 10:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Nice. Mainly 35-37% faster in the fast hashes, a bit less than expected.
First glance differences (to the GTX1080):
md5crypt (500): +63%
sha512crypt (1800): +88%
Kerberos 5 (7500+13100): +51%
DPAPI... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-20-2018, 11:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Could someone with a fresh benchmark of a GTX1080 (hashcat 4.2.1) do a comparison sheet? Or PN me the benchmark so I could do that. Thx! |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-21-2018, 12:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
|
soxrok2212 Wrote: (09-21-2018, 12:25 AM)
--
I can benchmark again later on the most recent drivers, though I doubt it'll change much.
--
That would be great! |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-21-2018, 12:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Thanks malakudi. Which driver did you use? FE-version? Stock clock? |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-23-2018, 04:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Same here with the GTX980. NVidia 397.xx fine, 411.62 slow. I don't wanna sound paranoid, but it's odd that with the new driver and cards the older ones suddenly get slower.
I'm just preparing the ... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-23-2018, 06:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
|
Nikos Wrote: (09-23-2018, 02:08 PM)
--
@Flomac
It seems that you were wrong in all parameters of Turing architecture and implementation eventually.
--
Nope.
Quote:
--
RT cores are fixed-function n... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-23-2018, 09:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| The results are in. The standard benchmark values are compared since this makes most sense and keeps the list clear.
Overall:
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 1080: +63%
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 980: +197%
GTX 1080 v... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-23-2018, 09:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Thanks for the benchmakrs guys, I'll add them tomorrow. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-24-2018, 07:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| I've updated the benchmark comparison with the 1080 Ti.
Overall:
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 1080 Ti: +9%
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 1080: +63%
RTX 2080 vs. GTX 980: +197%
GTX 1080 Ti vs. GTX 1080: +49%
GTX 1080 vs. GTX ... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-26-2018, 10:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Yep, the values of th 1080 seem a bit too slow. At least 7-zip is not ok.
@cvsi: Could you also run a benchmark for the 1080? Then we'd have the same system, OS & driver for the three cards. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-27-2018, 11:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Thanks cvsi, these results look more like what I've expected. No rerun needed.
I've updated the comparison sheet with the new values. Everything has shifted a bit, RTX 2080 now being 57% faster tha... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-27-2018, 06:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Thank atom, I didn't realize that. You never stop learning. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-29-2018, 11:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Nikos, I never wanted to apologize to you, I just stand by my mistakes. You've pulled a tech discussion to the personal level.
Quote:
--
I'm not going to reply again with all the points that I was ... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-29-2018, 11:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia RTX 2080
Post: RE: NVidia RTX 2080
| Nikos,
although it might be a waste of time to throw more time on this discussion with you, let's just correct some things one and for all.
Nikos Wrote: (09-25-2018, 07:11 AM)
--
The benchmarks tha... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
93 |
83,309 |
09-26-2018, 09:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
| The upcoming 980Ti will use the same chip, has only 6GB of RAM (still very fine for Hashcat) and speed should be at least the same if not higher.
Next year a new kid will rock up the place named Pasc... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
22 |
65,499 |
04-22-2015, 07:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
| @Jeremi: Thanks! And I actually wanted to ask you yesterday if there are any news on the Titan front ;)
@Rolf: great work, these comparisons are gold, we actually should have something like a databas... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
22 |
65,499 |
04-22-2015, 01:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
Post: RE: Nvidia GTX Titan X Benchmarks
|
epixoip Wrote: (04-22-2015, 09:18 PM)
--
Flomac Wrote: (04-22-2015, 07:48 PM)
--
But I'm a bit disappointed that the Titan X is only 30% faster than the GTX 980.
--
I think you misunderstood. Rolf... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
22 |
65,499 |
04-22-2015, 09:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
| The 290X makes over 35M p/s / $ in MD5. Not too shabby for that old stick. |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
06-06-2015, 06:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 980 TI Bench
Post: RE: 980 TI Bench
|
Rolf Wrote: (06-07-2015, 05:34 AM)
--
Flomac Wrote: (06-06-2015, 06:41 PM)
--
The 290X makes over 35M p/s / $ in MD5. Not too shabby for that old stick.
--
According to Jeremi's benchmarks (https://... |
|
Flomac |
Hardware
|
26 |
60,429 |
06-08-2015, 12:18 AM |
