Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
|
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Hi,
I am getting about 204 Kh/s for WPA2 on a R9 290x / Win 8.1
Using the --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 speeds things up to about 225 Kh/s, but the video driver crashes after about a couple of minutes... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,236 |
02-18-2015, 06:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: RE: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
philsmd Wrote: (02-18-2015, 11:56 AM)
--
Here you can read about the registry patch for windows:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=timeout_patch
--
I will try that tonight, thanks. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,236 |
02-18-2015, 05:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: Brute Force WPA2
If we have a WPA2 handshake, and wanted to brute force it with -1 ?l?u?d for starters, but we dont know the length of the password, would this be a good start?
oclhashcat.exe -m 2500 -a 3 -1 ?l... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 07:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
I think what am looking for is, if it means: Start incrementing from 8 up to 12, given the custom char set of lower case, upper case, and digits
-i --incremement-min 8 --increment-max 12 -a 3 -a ?... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
Sorry that was a typo, it was supposed to be -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d
Ahhh, so we still have to specify the mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1, even though we already have the --increment-max 12, correct? |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Post: RE: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
R9 290x, Win 8.1, v 1.32, WPA2 (-m 2500), 14.9, I am using a big dic (1.2 billion words), and I get 204-220 Kh/s through the dic attack |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,758 |
02-18-2015, 09:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Post: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Example: time to go through a 1 billion wordlist dic attack takes 1 hour.
Based on a rule-base attack, for each single "function" it would therefore take 1 hour to go through the entire wordlist. ... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
22,558 |
02-19-2015, 07:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Post: RE: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
I think you missed my point. I am trying to find the "best bang for the buck" wordlist which will get the best statistical results vs the number of words it has. I am obviously not looking for a "perf... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
22,558 |
02-19-2015, 04:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Post: RE: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Yes well the plan is to run through all the dic files first, and then follow up with the combinator / rule attacks, but obviously if I use a large dic with the best64 rule file for example, that would... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
22,558 |
02-19-2015, 05:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Run a video card benchmark like RealBench v2.4, set it to "Stress test" and run it for 1 hour. If it passes that, you are good to go. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,670 |
02-19-2015, 05:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Realbench will test memory, CPU and video card, but if you wanted a pure video card benchmark, I would suggest Valey Benchmark, run it, and see if the FPS drops to below 20 FPS lets say, and adjust yo... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,670 |
02-19-2015, 09:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
^^ True, but you also want to ensure the entire system stability vs just the ALU alone. A more complete test would be all of the above combined |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,670 |
02-20-2015, 02:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Post: RE: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
After some research, it seems the rockyou dictionary and best64, rockyou-30000 rule files are the best combination so far. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
22,558 |
02-20-2015, 02:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: What am I doing wrong??
I created an MD5 hash for the word data123, placed the word "data" in dic1, and the "123" on dic2.
The hash is accurate, because it gets cracked with the best64 rule file and dic1.
C:\Users\Ab... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,801 |
02-20-2015, 06:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
coolbry95: did you notice the "-a 1"
atom: in other words, under hashcat, I have to specify only 1 dic file.
That explains a lot already, but it still does not explain why its not working with ... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,801 |
02-20-2015, 07:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
I Confirm it works for hashcat with -a 1 and a single dic file
I tried 1.33 with ocl, same behavior with 2 dic files. I hope its not my PC acting up :P |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,801 |
02-20-2015, 07:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: Update Wiki to include hashcat w/ combinator attack: 1 dic file only
Post: Update Wiki to include hashcat w/ combinator attac...
Hi!
It clearly mentions on the oclhashcat that we need exactly 2 dictionary files for the combinator (combination) attack:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=oclhashcat
However, I have not ... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
2 |
6,219 |
02-20-2015, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Need Help With a new build plz!
Post: RE: Need Help With a new build plz!
Watercooling an R9 290x, then OC the thing to 1150 results in higher hash/s than a stock GTX 980. All under 54 degrees on the card, and the best part, for half the price of a 980
If it was up to me... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
28 |
40,943 |
02-20-2015, 10:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: Rule syntax question
I would like to verify if these 2 functions are the same:
Function 1: $$$1
Function 2: $$ $$ $1 |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-20-2015, 11:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-21-2015, 08:01 PM |