|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| wow, did not know it would account for 50% difference. The R9 290x is watercooled as well, so even more advantage, while the laptop is screaming :P
I am OCing the r9 290x to the most stable OC I c... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| Did some googling, so yes the 970M has 1280 cores vs the R9 290x has 2816. That explains a lot. Clock speed is 924 vs 1000 on the R9 |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| How can I report a potential bug or malfunction if my benchmark crashes as soon as it reaches scrypt for version 3.30 and 3.40?
Anything I can try to find out why, like older versions? Please help... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-08-2017, 01:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
|
atom Wrote: (03-08-2017, 09:54 AM)
--
I have seen the same error with AMDGPU-pro 16.40. This is a driver issue, not a hashcat issue.
--
I believe you, but why scrypt crashes, where as all the other ... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-08-2017, 04:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| Weird. I ran WPA and MD5 cracking all day without issues, so it seems that it is only limited to scrypt specifically. |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-10-2017, 05:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
| coolbry95: did you notice the "-a 1"
atom: in other words, under hashcat, I have to specify only 1 dic file.
That explains a lot already, but it still does not explain why its not working with ... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-20-2015, 07:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
| I Confirm it works for hashcat with -a 1 and a single dic file
I tried 1.33 with ocl, same behavior with 2 dic files. I hope its not my PC acting up :P |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-20-2015, 07:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: What am I doing wrong??
| I created an MD5 hash for the word data123, placed the word "data" in dic1, and the "123" on dic2.
The hash is accurate, because it gets cracked with the best64 rule file and dic1.
C:\Users\Ab... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-20-2015, 06:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
| Restarted my PC, and everything was working fine, with exact same commands, dic, etc... Very weird. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-23-2015, 03:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
| Hi,
I am getting about 204 Kh/s for WPA2 on a R9 290x / Win 8.1
Using the --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 speeds things up to about 225 Kh/s, but the video driver crashes after about a couple of minutes... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,236 |
02-18-2015, 06:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: RE: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
|
philsmd Wrote: (02-18-2015, 11:56 AM)
--
Here you can read about the registry patch for windows:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=timeout_patch
--
I will try that tonight, thanks. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,236 |
02-18-2015, 05:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: Brute Force WPA2
| If we have a WPA2 handshake, and wanted to brute force it with -1 ?l?u?d for starters, but we dont know the length of the password, would this be a good start?
oclhashcat.exe -m 2500 -a 3 -1 ?l... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 07:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| I think what am looking for is, if it means: Start incrementing from 8 up to 12, given the custom char set of lower case, upper case, and digits
-i --incremement-min 8 --increment-max 12 -a 3 -a ?... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| Sorry that was a typo, it was supposed to be -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d
Ahhh, so we still have to specify the mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1, even though we already have the --increment-max 12, correct? |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Post: RE: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
| R9 290x, Win 8.1, v 1.32, WPA2 (-m 2500), 14.9, I am using a big dic (1.2 billion words), and I get 204-220 Kh/s through the dic attack |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,756 |
02-18-2015, 09:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Post: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
| Example: time to go through a 1 billion wordlist dic attack takes 1 hour.
Based on a rule-base attack, for each single "function" it would therefore take 1 hour to go through the entire wordlist. ... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
22,557 |
02-19-2015, 07:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Post: RE: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
| I think you missed my point. I am trying to find the "best bang for the buck" wordlist which will get the best statistical results vs the number of words it has. I am obviously not looking for a "perf... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
22,557 |
02-19-2015, 04:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
Post: RE: wordlist recommendation for rule-based attack
| Yes well the plan is to run through all the dic files first, and then follow up with the combinator / rule attacks, but obviously if I use a large dic with the best64 rule file for example, that would... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
22,557 |
02-19-2015, 05:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
| Run a video card benchmark like RealBench v2.4, set it to "Stress test" and run it for 1 hour. If it passes that, you are good to go. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,666 |
02-19-2015, 05:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
| Realbench will test memory, CPU and video card, but if you wanted a pure video card benchmark, I would suggest Valey Benchmark, run it, and see if the FPS drops to below 20 FPS lets say, and adjust yo... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,666 |
02-19-2015, 09:15 PM |
