|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: Rule syntax question
| I would like to verify if these 2 functions are the same:
Function 1: $$$1
Function 2: $$ $$ $1 |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-20-2015, 11:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-21-2015, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
|
Szulik Wrote: (02-21-2015, 08:57 PM)
--
assume that wordlist got password XXX
right now
func.1 will be XXX$1
func.2 will be XXX$$1
--
Thanks...
So $$$1 is the same as $$ $1
meaning $$ as ... |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-21-2015, 10:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
| Lets take a word, ABC.
$$$1 -> ABC$1
$$ $1 -> ABC$1
What I am trying to understand is how come $$$1 is the same as $$ $1.. you would think it would be $$1, for instance.. |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-23-2015, 03:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
| ^^ Now it makes sense, thanks undeath
In other words, $$$1 is just saying, append $ and then right after, append 1.
What I was thinking is it was possible to write it as "$$1", meaning append $... |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-23-2015, 09:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need Help With a new build plz!
Post: RE: Need Help With a new build plz!
| Watercooling an R9 290x, then OC the thing to 1150 results in higher hash/s than a stock GTX 980. All under 54 degrees on the card, and the best part, for half the price of a 980
If it was up to me... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
28 |
40,943 |
02-20-2015, 10:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Its nice and all to put a hash/$ figure... BUT
Would you consider something "best bang for the buck" even if it takes twice as long for example? or consumes 30% more power? just some examples.
... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-10-2017, 10:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
|
kiara Wrote: (03-10-2017, 04:10 PM)
--
Flomac Wrote: (03-10-2017, 02:20 PM)
--
kiara Wrote: (03-10-2017, 01:12 AM)
--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L34ZkAF9q9w
the TI should be better no?
o... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-10-2017, 11:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Flomac: Till today, AMD still has issues with their drivers. Not sure what it would take for that to change! I have an R9 290x and am planning to switch to Nvidia for 2 reasons: Drivers and ULMB which... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-13-2017, 09:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
|
Flomac Wrote: (03-11-2017, 02:33 AM)
--
r9290xocl Wrote: (03-10-2017, 10:57 PM)
--
imo a best bang for the buck should also consider other factors like temps, power consumption, time it takes to cra... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-14-2017, 03:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| My issue is similar to this thread, but with hashcat and CUDA in my case:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4468.html |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-22-2017, 09:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| Thanks for your reply.
I think most people would agree that this is clearly a "workaround" rather than a solution. 99% of users would not know about this workaround, and would expect hashcat to wor... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
|
miccee Wrote: (02-23-2017, 09:01 PM)
--
Goldfreak has 9 characters, doesn't it?
--
That was just an example. In reality, it was 4 chars in the dic file and the rule file will add the other 6 chars.... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 10:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| atom: which previous version of hashcat had that functionality?
Yes it is true that it does tell the user, although you would need to know the logic of hashcat to realize more details.
The std... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-24-2017, 01:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| Hi,
I have a WPA2 handshake (hccap file) which I am doing tests on and I know the passphrase in advance, as I set it myself
There is clearly something wrong, and I am trying to figure out where t... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-22-2017, 08:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| atom: ahhh. I think I know what is the issue, and I really think there is a logical flaw. Let me explain.
The "real" password in the .hccap file is 10 char long. The "real" password in the dic file ... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 02:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| hi!
I have my usual R9 290x (watercooled) and I was running benchmarks with version 3.30 and 3.40
Using latest AMD drivers: 17.2.1, Windows 10
The benchmarks on both the 3.30 and 3.40 cr... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| Also, the 3.30 seems faster than the 3.40 on my card:
3.30
Md5: 13043 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4704 Mh/sec
3.40:
Md5: 11208 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4044 Mh/sec |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| I have a 970m in a laptop, and a r9 290x desktop, I ran version 3.30 on both, and got these results:
R9 290x:
Md5: 13043 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4704 Mh/sec
970M:
Md5: 6626 Mh/sec
SHA1: 2301 Mh/... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| atom: any feedback regarding why the benchmark is crashing when it is reaching "scrypt"? This is happening for both 3.30 and 3.40
btw, the graph you provided proves that earlier versions of hashca... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:01 PM |
