|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
|
Szulik Wrote: (02-21-2015, 08:57 PM)
--
assume that wordlist got password XXX
right now
func.1 will be XXX$1
func.2 will be XXX$$1
--
Thanks...
So $$$1 is the same as $$ $1
meaning $$ as ... |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-21-2015, 10:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| When using a wordlist such as rockyou with the rule file rockyou-30000.rule, an error pops up:
ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Any way to get around it besides splitting the rule file to multi... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,537 |
02-21-2015, 10:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
| Restarted my PC, and everything was working fine, with exact same commands, dic, etc... Very weird. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,801 |
02-23-2015, 03:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
| Lets take a word, ABC.
$$$1 -> ABC$1
$$ $1 -> ABC$1
What I am trying to understand is how come $$$1 is the same as $$ $1.. you would think it would be $$1, for instance.. |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-23-2015, 03:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| Seems it happens more when I use --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 it happens more, but I have seen it also without the gpu loops at some point.
C:\Users\Abe>C:\oclHashcat-1.33\oclHashcat64.exe -m 0 f2969... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,537 |
02-23-2015, 05:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
| ^^ Now it makes sense, thanks undeath
In other words, $$$1 is just saying, append $ and then right after, append 1.
What I was thinking is it was possible to write it as "$$1", meaning append $... |
|
r9290xocl |
General Help
|
9 |
12,632 |
02-23-2015, 09:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| Thanks atom, epixoip, I found those values while searching around this forum.
-w3 works fine, as well as --gpu-loops 1024 -n 32
Not sure what each of these does, not much documented on them ei... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,537 |
02-23-2015, 11:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,537 |
02-24-2015, 03:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| Hi,
I have a WPA2 handshake (hccap file) which I am doing tests on and I know the passphrase in advance, as I set it myself
There is clearly something wrong, and I am trying to figure out where t... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-22-2017, 08:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| My issue is similar to this thread, but with hashcat and CUDA in my case:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4468.html |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-22-2017, 09:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| atom: ahhh. I think I know what is the issue, and I really think there is a logical flaw. Let me explain.
The "real" password in the .hccap file is 10 char long. The "real" password in the dic file ... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 02:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| Thanks for your reply.
I think most people would agree that this is clearly a "workaround" rather than a solution. 99% of users would not know about this workaround, and would expect hashcat to wor... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
|
miccee Wrote: (02-23-2017, 09:01 PM)
--
Goldfreak has 9 characters, doesn't it?
--
That was just an example. In reality, it was 4 chars in the dic file and the rule file will add the other 6 chars.... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 10:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| atom: which previous version of hashcat had that functionality?
Yes it is true that it does tell the user, although you would need to know the logic of hashcat to realize more details.
The std... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-24-2017, 01:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| hi!
I have my usual R9 290x (watercooled) and I was running benchmarks with version 3.30 and 3.40
Using latest AMD drivers: 17.2.1, Windows 10
The benchmarks on both the 3.30 and 3.40 cr... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| Also, the 3.30 seems faster than the 3.40 on my card:
3.30
Md5: 13043 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4704 Mh/sec
3.40:
Md5: 11208 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4044 Mh/sec |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| I have a 970m in a laptop, and a r9 290x desktop, I ran version 3.30 on both, and got these results:
R9 290x:
Md5: 13043 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4704 Mh/sec
970M:
Md5: 6626 Mh/sec
SHA1: 2301 Mh/... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| atom: any feedback regarding why the benchmark is crashing when it is reaching "scrypt"? This is happening for both 3.30 and 3.40
btw, the graph you provided proves that earlier versions of hashca... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| wow, did not know it would account for 50% difference. The R9 290x is watercooled as well, so even more advantage, while the laptop is screaming :P
I am OCing the r9 290x to the most stable OC I c... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| Did some googling, so yes the 970M has 1280 cores vs the R9 290x has 2816. That explains a lot. Clock speed is 924 vs 1000 on the R9 |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:08 PM |
