|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| I have a 970m in a laptop, and a r9 290x desktop, I ran version 3.30 on both, and got these results:
R9 290x:
Md5: 13043 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4704 Mh/sec
970M:
Md5: 6626 Mh/sec
SHA1: 2301 Mh/... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,433 |
03-07-2017, 05:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: Brute Force WPA2
| If we have a WPA2 handshake, and wanted to brute force it with -1 ?l?u?d for starters, but we dont know the length of the password, would this be a good start?
oclhashcat.exe -m 2500 -a 3 -1 ?l... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,859 |
02-18-2015, 07:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| When using a wordlist such as rockyou with the rule file rockyou-30000.rule, an error pops up:
ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Any way to get around it besides splitting the rule file to multi... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,533 |
02-21-2015, 10:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| Hi,
I have a WPA2 handshake (hccap file) which I am doing tests on and I know the passphrase in advance, as I set it myself
There is clearly something wrong, and I am trying to figure out where t... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,311 |
02-22-2017, 08:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
| Hi,
I am getting about 204 Kh/s for WPA2 on a R9 290x / Win 8.1
Using the --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 speeds things up to about 225 Kh/s, but the video driver crashes after about a couple of minutes... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,227 |
02-18-2015, 06:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| hi!
I have my usual R9 290x (watercooled) and I was running benchmarks with version 3.30 and 3.40
Using latest AMD drivers: 17.2.1, Windows 10
The benchmarks on both the 3.30 and 3.40 cr... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,308 |
03-07-2017, 05:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Its nice and all to put a hash/$ figure... BUT
Would you consider something "best bang for the buck" even if it takes twice as long for example? or consumes 30% more power? just some examples.
... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,175 |
03-10-2017, 10:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
|
kiara Wrote: (03-10-2017, 04:10 PM)
--
Flomac Wrote: (03-10-2017, 02:20 PM)
--
kiara Wrote: (03-10-2017, 01:12 AM)
--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L34ZkAF9q9w
the TI should be better no?
o... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,175 |
03-10-2017, 11:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Flomac: Till today, AMD still has issues with their drivers. Not sure what it would take for that to change! I have an R9 290x and am planning to switch to Nvidia for 2 reasons: Drivers and ULMB which... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,175 |
03-13-2017, 09:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
|
Flomac Wrote: (03-11-2017, 02:33 AM)
--
r9290xocl Wrote: (03-10-2017, 10:57 PM)
--
imo a best bang for the buck should also consider other factors like temps, power consumption, time it takes to cra... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,175 |
03-14-2017, 03:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| wow, did not know it would account for 50% difference. The R9 290x is watercooled as well, so even more advantage, while the laptop is screaming :P
I am OCing the r9 290x to the most stable OC I c... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,433 |
03-07-2017, 05:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| Did some googling, so yes the 970M has 1280 cores vs the R9 290x has 2816. That explains a lot. Clock speed is 924 vs 1000 on the R9 |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,433 |
03-07-2017, 05:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| I think what am looking for is, if it means: Start incrementing from 8 up to 12, given the custom char set of lower case, upper case, and digits
-i --incremement-min 8 --increment-max 12 -a 3 -a ?... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,859 |
02-18-2015, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| Sorry that was a typo, it was supposed to be -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d
Ahhh, so we still have to specify the mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1, even though we already have the --increment-max 12, correct? |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,859 |
02-18-2015, 08:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| Seems it happens more when I use --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 it happens more, but I have seen it also without the gpu loops at some point.
C:\Users\Abe>C:\oclHashcat-1.33\oclHashcat64.exe -m 0 f2969... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,533 |
02-23-2015, 05:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| Thanks atom, epixoip, I found those values while searching around this forum.
-w3 works fine, as well as --gpu-loops 1024 -n 32
Not sure what each of these does, not much documented on them ei... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,533 |
02-23-2015, 11:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,533 |
02-24-2015, 03:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| My issue is similar to this thread, but with hashcat and CUDA in my case:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4468.html |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,311 |
02-22-2017, 09:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| atom: ahhh. I think I know what is the issue, and I really think there is a logical flaw. Let me explain.
The "real" password in the .hccap file is 10 char long. The "real" password in the dic file ... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,311 |
02-23-2017, 02:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| Thanks for your reply.
I think most people would agree that this is clearly a "workaround" rather than a solution. 99% of users would not know about this workaround, and would expect hashcat to wor... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,311 |
02-23-2017, 04:01 PM |
