|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: RE: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
|
philsmd Wrote: (02-18-2015, 11:56 AM)
--
Here you can read about the registry patch for windows:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=timeout_patch
--
I will try that tonight, thanks. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,236 |
02-18-2015, 05:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need Help With a new build plz!
Post: RE: Need Help With a new build plz!
| Watercooling an R9 290x, then OC the thing to 1150 results in higher hash/s than a stock GTX 980. All under 54 degrees on the card, and the best part, for half the price of a 980
If it was up to me... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
28 |
40,943 |
02-20-2015, 10:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
| Run a video card benchmark like RealBench v2.4, set it to "Stress test" and run it for 1 hour. If it passes that, you are good to go. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,670 |
02-19-2015, 05:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
| Realbench will test memory, CPU and video card, but if you wanted a pure video card benchmark, I would suggest Valey Benchmark, run it, and see if the FPS drops to below 20 FPS lets say, and adjust yo... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,670 |
02-19-2015, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
Post: RE: impropper overclovk symptoms ?
| ^^ True, but you also want to ensure the entire system stability vs just the ALU alone. A more complete test would be all of the above combined |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
13,670 |
02-20-2015, 02:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| My issue is similar to this thread, but with hashcat and CUDA in my case:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4468.html |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-22-2017, 09:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| atom: ahhh. I think I know what is the issue, and I really think there is a logical flaw. Let me explain.
The "real" password in the .hccap file is 10 char long. The "real" password in the dic file ... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 02:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| Thanks for your reply.
I think most people would agree that this is clearly a "workaround" rather than a solution. 99% of users would not know about this workaround, and would expect hashcat to wor... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
|
miccee Wrote: (02-23-2017, 09:01 PM)
--
Goldfreak has 9 characters, doesn't it?
--
That was just an example. In reality, it was 4 chars in the dic file and the rule file will add the other 6 chars.... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-23-2017, 10:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| atom: which previous version of hashcat had that functionality?
Yes it is true that it does tell the user, although you would need to know the logic of hashcat to realize more details.
The std... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-24-2017, 01:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| Seems it happens more when I use --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 it happens more, but I have seen it also without the gpu loops at some point.
C:\Users\Abe>C:\oclHashcat-1.33\oclHashcat64.exe -m 0 f2969... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,537 |
02-23-2015, 05:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
| Thanks atom, epixoip, I found those values while searching around this forum.
-w3 works fine, as well as --gpu-loops 1024 -n 32
Not sure what each of these does, not much documented on them ei... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,537 |
02-23-2015, 11:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clEnqueueCopyBuffer() -30
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
7 |
12,537 |
02-24-2015, 03:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| I think what am looking for is, if it means: Start incrementing from 8 up to 12, given the custom char set of lower case, upper case, and digits
-i --incremement-min 8 --increment-max 12 -a 3 -a ?... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| Sorry that was a typo, it was supposed to be -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d
Ahhh, so we still have to specify the mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1, even though we already have the --increment-max 12, correct? |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| wow, did not know it would account for 50% difference. The R9 290x is watercooled as well, so even more advantage, while the laptop is screaming :P
I am OCing the r9 290x to the most stable OC I c... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| Did some googling, so yes the 970M has 1280 cores vs the R9 290x has 2816. That explains a lot. Clock speed is 924 vs 1000 on the R9 |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Its nice and all to put a hash/$ figure... BUT
Would you consider something "best bang for the buck" even if it takes twice as long for example? or consumes 30% more power? just some examples.
... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-10-2017, 10:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
|
kiara Wrote: (03-10-2017, 04:10 PM)
--
Flomac Wrote: (03-10-2017, 02:20 PM)
--
kiara Wrote: (03-10-2017, 01:12 AM)
--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L34ZkAF9q9w
the TI should be better no?
o... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-10-2017, 11:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Flomac: Till today, AMD still has issues with their drivers. Not sure what it would take for that to change! I have an R9 290x and am planning to switch to Nvidia for 2 reasons: Drivers and ULMB which... |
|
r9290xocl |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-13-2017, 09:32 PM |
